| Issue |
A&A
Volume 708, April 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A173 | |
| Number of page(s) | 20 | |
| Section | Astronomical instrumentation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202558376 | |
| Published online | 06 April 2026 | |
QUIJOTE-TFGI polarization calibration
Ground characterization and on-sky validation with Tau A and the Moon
1
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias,
38200
La Laguna, Tenerife,
Spain
2
Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL),
38206
La Laguna, Tenerife,
Spain
3
Instituto de Física de Cantabria (IFCA), Avda. Los Castros s/n,
39005
Santander,
Spain
4
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa,
Chiba
277-8583,
Japan
★ Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
3
December
2025
Accepted:
27
February
2026
Abstract
Context. Polarization measurements in the 30–40 GHz range are essential to improving our understanding of Galactic synchrotron radiation and potential anomalous microwave emissions, and obtaining such measurements will ultimately aid in detecting primordial B modes. To achieve this aim, it is crucial to achieve unprecedented performance in instrumentation. Thus, accurately calibrating instrument responses and the polarization angle represents an essential step in state-of-the-art setups. The modeling and mitigation of systematic effects are also critical in this context.
Aims. Our objective is to characterize the QUIJOTE Thirty and Forty GHz instrument (TFGI), calibrate it with a reference calibration signal on the ground, compare our results with on-sky calibration based on bright sources, and study the stability of the calibration parameters over time.
Methods. First, from the ground, we fit the data using a reference calibration signal (a diode) introduced to resolve degeneracies among the various instrument angles. Finally, we utilized on-sky observations of Tau A and the Moon to validate the results.
Results. By creating calibration datasets obtained with the reference diode, we evaluated the data quality and quantified phase switch errors to account for the fine polarization response. We also utilized Tau A and Moon observations to calibrate the system’s response and stability over time. In addition, we calculated the refraction index of the Moon to be nMoon = 1.209 ± 0.007 (stat) ± 0.009 (sys) at 31 GHz under smooth-surface assumption.
Conclusions. The results from fitting the instrument phase-switch error angle align with 0 deg at 2σ precision, indicating that no further correction is required within a few percent precision. The calibrations with astrophysical sources (Tau A and the Moon) yielded consistent results that constrain the polarization angle and responsivity. The polarization efficiency aligns well with ground measurements and the Tau A characterization, whereas the Moon-based calibration is more affected by systematics. We found hints of responsivity variations over time, although the relative responsivity between channels was found to remain stable. We conclude that installing a live calibrator in the future will enhance the performance of TFGI by continuously monitoring responsivity and in turn improving the mitigation of systematic effects.
Key words: instrumentation: detectors / instrumentation: polarimeters / Moon / cosmology: miscellaneous
© The Authors 2026
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.