Open Access

Fig. 12

image

Download original image

The first panel compares the t1/2 predictions with the actual values for the test dataset using a linear model based solely on the magnitude gap M12. The second and third panels show the linear model predictions when additional observable properties from Tables 2 and 3 in Section 2 are incrementally included, namely MBCG/Msat and M14, along with M12. The second panel presents predictions analysis from a linear model using MBCG/Msat along with M12. Similarly, the third panel show predictions analysis based on MBCG/Msat and M14, respectively, combined with M12. In the right column, we show the usual scatter and contour density plots comparing the predicted and actual t1/2s, while the histogram of relative errors is displayed on the right side. We also present the relative error histogram for CNN Model 2, which provides the best balance between median relative error bias (positive median bias) and scatter among the three CNN models. This is for comparing the performance of the linear models with that of the CNN models.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.