Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 701, September 2025
Article Number A241
Number of page(s) 9
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554138
Published online 18 September 2025

© The Authors 2025

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

1. Introduction

The study of X-ray emission in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) entered a new era after the launch, in December 2021, of the NASA-ASI Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE; Weisskopf et al. 2022). In its working band (2 − 8 keV), the emission from unobscured radio-quiet AGNs is dominated by radiation from the hot electron corona (i.e., the primary continuum; Shapiro et al. 1976; Sunyaev & Titarchuk 1980; Haardt & Maraschi 1991) surrounding the BH-AD system in the center of these galaxies. This structure, in which optical-UV photons from the disk are thought to be Comptonized by hot electrons (Haardt & Maraschi 1993), has been widely studied via spectroscopy in recent decades. Facilities such as BeppoSAX, Suzaku, INTEGRAL, and especially NuSTAR were able to determine the coronal physical properties, i.e., the electron temperature (kTe), found to range between tens and hundreds of keV, and its Thomson optical depth τ (e.g., Dadina 2007; De Rosa et al. 2012; Malizia et al. 2014; Marinucci et al. 2018; Tortosa et al. 2018; Middei et al. 2019; Kamraj et al. 2022; Serafinelli et al. 2023). Moreover, some constraints on coronal size and location have been derived using time-lag techniques (e.g., Uttley et al. 2014; Fabian et al. 2017; Caballero-García et al. 2020). However, since spectroscopy alone does not distinguish between different geometric configurations (e.g., Tortosa et al. 2018; Middei et al. 2019), constraining its morphology remains an open issue. Since inverse-Compton scattering produces polarized radiation that depends on the geometry of the disk-corona system (Tamborra et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019; Ursini et al. 2022), X-ray polarimetry offers a promising tool.

Many geometric models reflecting different coronal origins have been proposed to date. Among them are the “spherical lamppost”, the “conical outflow”, and the “slab” above the disk. Their polarization signatures have been calculated using several radiative transfer codes (e.g., Schnittman & Krolik 2010; Tamborra et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2019) and compared with data collected by IXPE during its first years of operation (Marinucci et al. 2022; Gianolli et al. 2023; Tagliacozzo et al. 2023; Ingram et al. 2023; Gianolli et al. 2024). The spherical lamppost consists of a spherical source placed at a certain height on the spin axis of the BH. Due to its high degree of symmetry, this configuration is expected to produce very low polarization degrees (Π = 0 − 2%) and polarization angle (Ψ) perpendicular to the AD axis (Ursini et al. 2022). The conical outflow model is commonly associated with an aborted jet (Henri & Petrucci 1997; Ghisellini et al. 2004). According to this model, even in radio-quiet AGN, a jet can be launched, but it fails because its velocity is smaller than the escape velocity (Ghisellini et al. 2004). In this scenario, Π is expected to reach higher values than in the spherical lamppost model (up to 6%), while Ψ remains perpendicular to the disk axis (Ursini et al. 2022), which is a common feature of vertically extended models. Another widely used geometric model is the slab corona (Liang 1979; Haardt & Maraschi 1991). In this model, the hot medium is assumed to extend over the AD and can occur when magnetic loops extend well above the disk plane and release energy through reconnection (e.g., Beloborodov 2017). This configuration is expected to produce a relatively high Π (up to 14%), with a polarization angle parallel to the AD axis (Poutanen & Svensson 1996; Ursini et al. 2022). However, these models pose issues with respect to their ability to reproduce the spectra of radio-quiet AGNs and /or their physical origin and energy sustainability (Poutanen et al. 2018). For these reasons, other geometric models have been proposed. In this paper, we discuss the so-called “wedge corona model” and present results of detailed Monte Carlo simulations assuming different physical and geometric configurations.

The paper is structured as follows: in Sect. 2, we describe the Wedge model; in Sect. 3, we show the results of the Monte Carlo simulations, discussing the dependencies on the various parameters; in Sect. 4 we apply the results to the case of the Seyfert galaxy NGC 4151, which is the only radio-quiet, unobscured AGN for which IXPE has so far detected a clear polarization; finally, in Sect. 5, we summarize the results.

2. The wedge

2.1. Why the wedge corona?

As discussed in Sect. 1, many geometric models have been developed for the AGN X-ray corona. The goal in developing such models is to reproduce spectral, timing, and polarimetric data, along with providing a reliable and convincing physical motivation.

With regard to X-ray polarization, recent observations of radio-quiet unobscured AGNs performed by IXPE place constraints on the coronal geometric configuration. During its first years of operations, IXPE observed four radio-quiet unobscured AGNs: MCG-05-23-16 (twice, in May and November 2022; Marinucci et al. 2022; Tagliacozzo et al. 2023), IC 4329A (in January 2023; Ingram et al. 2023), NGC 4151 (twice, in December 2022 and in May 2024; Gianolli et al. 2023, 2024) and NCG 2110 (in October 2024).

In NGC 4151 a significant detection was obtained in both IXPE observations (Π = 4.5%±0.9% and Ψ = 81° ±6°, from a combined analysis). If most of the polarized light is attributed to the primary emission from the X-ray corona, as suggested by the spectral fitting, its polarization fraction reaches 7.1%±1.2% and the polarization angle is consistent with the radio jet, favoring radially extended coronal models. For IC 4329A, IXPE measured polarization at a 2.97σ confidence level, with Π = 3.3%±1.1% and Ψ = 78° ±10°, just slightly below the 3σ threshold typically required for detection. From the contour plot, the most probable value of the polarization angle is consistent with the jet position angle inferred from a September 2021 ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter Array) observation, again favoring radially extended coronal models. In the case of MCG-05-23-16, the combined May and November 2022 observations yielded only an upper limit Π < 3.2% (at 99% confidence level) to the polarization degree, and therefore the polarization angle, at this confidence level, is unconstrained. However, from the contour plot between the degree and angle of polarization, an alignment between Ψ and the position angle of the [OIII] emission (a proxy for the AD axis) has the highest probability, again hinting at a radially extended corona. Finally, NGC 2110 has been recently observed and its spectro-polarimetric analysis is still ongoing.

In summary, IXPE results show that due to the alignment between the polarization angle of the 2 − 8 keV coronal emission (i.e. primary continuum) and the AD symmetry axis, radially extended coronal models are favored over vertically extended ones, for which angles perpendicular to the disk axis are expected.

From a spectroscopic point of view, Stern et al. (1995) showed that, in AGNs, slab models sandwiching the disk generally produce spectra steeper than observed, owing to the substantial flux of reprocessed photons that cool the electrons in the corona. To overcome this and other problems, models have been proposed in which the standard AD is truncated at a radius larger than the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO), and the X-ray-emitting corona takes the form of an inner hot, possibly magnetized accretion flow (Petrucci et al. 2008; Poutanen et al. 2018).

2.2. The wedge corona model

In this context, we describe the wedge corona model (Esin et al. 1997, 1998; Schnittman & Krolik 2010; Poutanen et al. 2018; see Fig. 1). This model has the advantage of reducing the disk area subtended by the hot corona, thereby overcoming the problem of excessively steep spectra. Moreover, this model results in polarization angles that are parallel to the AD vertical axis (Gianolli et al. 2023; Tagliacozzo et al. 2023; see Sect. 3), consistent with findings by IXPE in radio-quiet, unobscured AGNs.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Wedge corona model geometry, characterized by an inner (Rin) and an outer (Rout) radius and an opening angle (α), measured from the AD plane. In the left configuration, the inner radius of the AD coincides with the outer radius of the corona, while in the right configuration it extends into the corona itself. The R and z axes represent the radial and the vertical coordinates, respectively.

The wedge geometry is defined by the following parameters: an inner radius (Rin), an outer radius (Rout), and a constant opening angle (α) measured from the AD plane. We assume that the inner radius coincides with the ISCO, which depends on the spin value of BH, being equal to 6 RG for a = 0 and ∼1.24 RG for a = 0.998, where RG is the gravitational radius. Unlike the slab configuration, the height (h) of the wedge increases with radius (r), maintaining a constant value of tanα = h/r. In this configuration, the AD is assumed to be truncated at a certain radius (Rdisk), while the corona represents a “hot accretion flow” extending down to the ISCO. A limitation of the present version of the MONK code is that the radial density and temperature profiles of the wedge corona are assumed to be uniform. This may hamper the comparison between different BH spins. In fact, for high black hole spin, energy dissipation is expected to peak at lower radii, where the general relativity effects are stronger. If emission primarily originates from these inner regions, it could lead to substantial deviations in the polarization angle (Ψ). Additionally, different temperatures and densities close to the event horizon may significantly influence the expected polarization degree (Π). These effects should be considered in future investigations, together with a self-consistent treatment of the disc-corona interaction. The Thomson optical depth (τ) is defined radially; it is computed along a straight line starting from the center of the system along the AD plane. The AD truncation radius can coincide with the external edge of the corona, be truncated at higher distances, or reach lower values down to the ISCO. Finally, the wedge can be either stationary (i.e., the angular velocity of the fluid is equal to that of a zero-angular momentum observer) or corotating with the Keplerian disk.

3. Monte Carlo simulations

To calculate the polarization properties of the X-ray primary continuum in the IXPE energy band (i.e., 2 − 8 keV) as a function of the physical and geometric parameters of the wedge corona, we performed detailed Monte Carlo simulations with the radiative transfer code for Comptonized spectra MONK (Zhang et al. 2019). The MONK code calculates the spectrum and polarization of Comptonized radiation from a corona illuminated by a standard AD. The seed optical and UV photons are generated according to the Novikov-Thorne disk emissivity, with a polarization parallel to the disk surface in the local frame, ranging from zero (face-on) to 11.7% (edge-on) as expected for a semi-infinite, plane-parallel, scattering-dominated atmosphere (Chandrasekhar 1960). After the photons leave the disk, they follow geodesics paths in Kerr spacetime around the black hole, either reaching the distant observer, being deflected back to the disk, or being lost by crossing the event horizon. Photons that enter the corona may undergo Compton up-scattering, producing a Comptonized spectrum and modifying their polarization. The scatterings that occur in the corona significantly impact the radiation emitted by the disk in two key ways. Firstly, they modify the original spectrum through inverse Compton scattering, which increases the photon energy to higher values (mostly from optical and UV to X-ray), resulting in a harder spectrum. Secondly, they can alter both the intensity and alignment of the overall polarization signature at higher energies. The Stokes parameters of the scattered photons are calculated in the electron rest frame before being transformed to the observer’s frame (Boyer-Lindquist). By counting the photons that reach the observer, a flux and polarization spectra are created. Since scattering produces linearly polarized photons, the code calculates the Stokes parameters Q and U, while V is assigned a value of zero.

Among the radio-quiet, unobscured AGNs observed by IXPE, NGC 4151 presents the most robust detection so far. Thus, this Seyfert galaxy was selected as the prototype source for the Monte Carlo simulations. NGC 4151 has been classified as a changing-look AGN (Penston & Perez 1984; Puccetti et al. 2007; Shapovalova et al. 2008), going from F0.5 − 10 keV ∼ 8.7 × 10−11 erg s−1 cm−2 in a low-flux state to F0.5 − 10 keV ∼ 2.8 × 10−10 erg s−1 cm−2 in a high-flux state (Antonucci & Cohen 1983; Shapovalova et al. 2012; Beuchert et al. 2017). This source has been widely observed in X-rays and exhibits spectral variability and complex absorption structures (Beuchert et al. 2017). A near-maximal BH spin has been inferred from relativistic reflection off the AD (Cackett et al. 2014; Keck et al. 2015; Beuchert et al. 2017). With a BH mass of MBH = 4.57 × 107M, measured via optical and UV reverberation (Bentz et al. 2006), this source has an Eddington ratio of 1% (Keck et al. 2015). From the joint observations of NGC 4151, performed with XMM-Newton, NuSTAR, and IXPE in December 2022, Gianolli et al. (2023) found, using NTHCOMP to model the Comptonized primary continuum, a spectral index Γ = 1.85 ± 0.01 and an electron temperature k T e = 60 6 + 7 $ kT_{\mathrm{e}}=60^{+7}_{-6} $ keV. As explained in Sect. 2.1, spectro-polarimetric analysis yielded a significant detection in both IXPE observations (from a combined analysis: Π = 4.5%±0.9% and Ψ = 81° ±6°, aligned with the AD axis; Gianolli et al. 2024). Finally, reverberation studies of the broad-line region, suggest a disk inclination of 58 . 1 9.6 ° + 8.4 $ 58.1^{\circ+8.4}_{-9.6} $ for NGC 4151 (Bentz et al. 2022).

We began constructing a baseline wedge corona model by adopting the BH mass and Eddington ratio of NGC 4151. The coronal internal radius was set to the ISCO (6 RG for a = 0) and the external radius to 25 RG. Initially, we set the AD inner radius to 25 RG, coinciding with the coronal external radius; the disk outer radius to 100 RG; and the wedge opening angle to the intermediate value of 30°. Additionally, we set the electron temperature to 60 keV and determined the coronal optical depth such that it reproduced a primary continuum spectral index of 1.85 (τ = 1.9), consistent with observations of NGC 4151. Both the disk and the corona rotate with Keplerian velocity around the central BH.

3.1. Opening angle

Starting from the baseline configuration, we modified the wedge opening angle, testing four different cases: 5°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°. We also tested different values of the BH spin (a = 0 and a = 0.998), modifying the coronal internal radius accordingly (6 RG for a = 0 and 1.24 RG for a = 0.998). For both spin cases, we find that the Comptonized spectrum hardens with increasing opening angle. This hardening occurs because increasing the opening angle increases the effective optical depths experienced by the soft photons, increasing the number of scatterings a photon undergoes before leaving the corona, and thus resulting in a hardening of the spectrum. Figure 2 shows the primary continuum spectral shape as a function of the energy in the 2 − 8 keV energy band for different values of the wedge opening angle.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Primary continuum normalized flux as a function of photons energy (2 − 8 keV) for different wedge opening angles (α) in the baseline configuration. The parameters are: Rcorona = 6RG, Rdisk = 25RG, kTe = 60 keV, and τ = 1.9. As the opening angle increases, the spectral index (Γ) of the nuclear emission drops, leading to harder spectra.

Regarding the polarization properties, we found that, consistent with Tagliacozzo et al. (2023), Ψ is generally parallel to the AD axis (i.e., Ψ = 0). Figure 3 shows Ψ, summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination angle (measured from the disk axis) for different wedge opening angles. We observe a slight deviation for α = 60°, where, at high source inclinations, Ψ assumes values that increasingly differ from zero. This is because, locally, photons emerging from the corona have mean polarization vectors preferentially directed either perpendicular or parallel to the coronal surface. For high opening angles, this direction differs significantly from that of the disk axis. In the absence of rotation, summing all these photons results in a net polarization angle equal to zero for symmetry reasons, as we verified by imposing zero rotation of the corona. However, when rotation is included, Doppler boosting implies that approaching matter appears brighter than receding matter, effectively breaking the axial symmetry.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Polarization angle (Ψ), summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination of the source (cos θdisk = 1 corresponds to the face-on view), assuming different wedge opening angles (α) in the same configuration as in Fig. 2. The polarization angle, Ψ, is generally parallel to the AD axis, except for α = 60° (dotted purple line).

Regarding the polarization degree, Π decreases with increasing opening angle owing to the rise in spherical symmetry, moving from a “slab-like” (α = 5°) to a “sphere-like” (α = 60°) configuration. Figure 4 shows Π, summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination angle for different wedge opening angles, for both a = 0 (left panel) and a = 0.998 (right panel). The dependence on the BH spin is discussed in Sect. 3.3.

thumbnail Fig. 4.

Polarization fraction (Π), summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination of the source, assuming different wedge opening angles. In both panels, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and Rdisk = 25RG. The left panel corresponds to the a = 0 and Rcorona = 6RG scenario, while the right panel corresponds to a = 0.998 and Rcorona = 1.24RG scenario. As the opening angle increases, Π decreases due to the increasing degree of symmetry of the system.

3.2. Disk inner radius

Next, we tested different values of the inner radius of the AD (Rdisk). While in the baseline model Rdisk only reaches the outer radius of the corona (25 RG), here we added two additional scenarios: in one, we set Rdisk to approximately half of the wedge radius (12 RG), while in the other, we set it close to the ISCO (6 RG for a = 0 and 1.24 RG for a = 0.998). We observed a softening of the primary continuum spectrum as Rdisk goes deeper into the corona. This is due to the peculiar shape of the wedge, which causes the effective optical depth lessens when seed photons are emitted at low radii. For the same reason, Π increases when Rdisk decreases (see Fig. 5). This is illustrated in Fig. 6, where the normalized flux, summed over the 2 − 8 keV band, is plotted as a function of the number of scatterings undergone by photons inside the corona before escaping the system and reaching the observer. We note that, when the disk sinks into the corona, the dominant scattering number decreases. This is due both to the reduced effective optical depth mentioned above and to the hotter inner regions, which require fewer scatterings to shift the photon energy into the 2 − 8 keV band.

thumbnail Fig. 5.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for the AD internal radius (Rdisk) in the baseline configuration. In both panels, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and the wedge opening angle to α = 30°. The left panel shows the a = 0 and Rcorona = 6RG scenario. The difference between Rdisk = 12RG and Rdisk = 6RG is small. The right panel shows the a = 0.998 and Rcorona = 1.24RG scenario. Here, the difference between Rdisk = 12RG and Rdisk = 1.24RG is much higher.

thumbnail Fig. 6.

Normalized flux as a function of photon scattering number, summed over the 2 − 8 keV energy band. The coronal parameters are the same as in Fig. 5 (left panel). As shown, the dominant scattering level decreases for lower values of Rdisk.

3.3. Black hole spin

We also tested different values of the BH spin, exploring both a = 0 and a = 0.998. The inner radius of the corona was modified accordingly (6 RG for a = 0 and = 1.24 RG for a = 0.998). The same modification was applied to the internal radius of the disk when it extends down to the ISCO. We observe a softening of the primary continuum spectrum and an increase in the polarization fraction for the high-spin cases. This is because, as shown by Shakura & Sunyaev (1973) and Novikov et al. (1973), the disk temperature is higher at a given radius when the spin is higher. Consequently, fewer scatterings are needed for the seed photons to be shifted into the X-ray band (see also 3.2). Furthermore, the disk Keplerian velocity (Ω) depends on the value of the BH spin according to Ω ∼ (r3/2 + a)−1 (Zhang et al. 2019). This determines an increasing loss of symmetry and a corresponding increase in the net polarization. The difference between a = 0 and a = 0.998 cases is particularly pronounced when the disk inner radius approaches values close to the ISCO for the same reason. Figure 7 shows Π as a function of the source inclination. The left panel compares the two BH spin scenarios in the baseline configuration (for α = 30° and 45°), while the right panel compares the two BH spins for different values of the disk inner radius.

thumbnail Fig. 7.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for BH spin. In both panels, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and the inner radius of the corona is set to the ISCO value of the corresponding spin configuration. The left panel compares BH spins with Rdisk = 25RG for different wedge opening angles (α). The right panel compares BH spins for different values of the inner radius of the AD (Rdisk). The Π increases with increasing spin.

3.4. Coronal temperature

In addition to the baseline case (kTe = 60 keV), we tested six more cases of coronal electron temperature: kTe = 25, 75, 100, 200, 300, and 400 keV. For all of these temperatures, we tested both the a = 0 and the a = 0.998 scenarios. We find that the spectrum was harder for higher values of the electron temperature (Middei et al. 2019), qualitatively following the well-known relation between Γ and kTe for a fixed τ (Shapiro et al. 1976; Sunyaev & Titarchuk 1980; Lightman & Zdziarski 1987):

Γ = [ 9 4 + m e c 2 k T e τ ( 1 + τ / 3 ) ] 1 / 2 1 / 2 . $$ \begin{aligned} \Gamma = [\frac{9}{4}+\frac{m_ec^2}{kT_e\tau (1+\tau /3)}]^{1/2}-1/2 . \end{aligned} $$(1)

Regarding polarization, we observe a decrease in Π moving from kTe = 25 keV to kTe = 400 keV. This is due to the well-known decrease in polarization with increasing electron energy in the Compton cross section (Poutanen 1994; Matt et al. 1996). Figure 8, presents Π as a function of the source inclination, comparing different coronal temperatures (a = 0 in the left panel and a = 0.998 in the right).

thumbnail Fig. 8.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for the coronal temperature. In both panels, the wedge opening angle is set to α = 30°, the inner radius of the corona is set to the ISCO value of the corresponding spin configuration, and the inner radius of the AD is fixed at Rdisk = 25RG. The left panel shows the a = 0 and Rcorona = 6RG scenario. The right panel shows the: a = 0.998 and Rcorona = 1.24RG scenario. When the temperature increases, Π decreases due to electrons motion randomization.

3.5. Optical depth

As a final test, we modified the baseline configuration by varying different coronal optical depth (τ) values. We assumed τ = 0.5, 1, 1.9 (corresponding to the value reproducing the spectral index found for NGC 4151 in the baseline model), 2.5, 5, and 10. As shown in Fig. 9, when τ decreases, Π increases. As previously mentioned, this results from the fact that a high number of scatterings more effectively randomize the photon distribution.

thumbnail Fig. 9.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for coronal optical depth (τ). In both panels, the wedge opening angle is set to α = 30°, the spin of the BH is set to a = 0, the inner radius of the corona is set to Rcorona = 6RG, and the inner radius of the AD to Rdisk = 25RG. When τ decreases, Π increases.

4. The case of NGC 4151

Next, we performed simulations using τ values that reproduce a primary continuum spectral index of Γ = 1.85 ± 0.01 for each different geometric and physical configuration, consistent with the best-fit value found for NGC 4151 (Gianolli et al. 2023). Initially, we fixed the electron temperature at 60 keV, as appropriate for this source, but we also explored a range of temperatures. We observed the same qualitative trends as in the previous cases, in which we left τ constant. For different opening angles (see Fig. 10), cases with higher τ than the baseline configuration result in lower Π, while cases in which τ is lower result in higher Π. Similar behavior is found when varying the inner disk radius (Fig. 11) and BH spin (Fig. 12). In contrast, a different behavior is obtained in the case of different coronal temperatures (Fig. 13): we observed an increase in Π from kTe = 25 to kTe = 75 keV, followed by a decrease for higher temperatures. This is due to two opposing effects: for a given Γ, a higher temperature corresponds to a lower τ (Middei et al. 2019), but for higher temperature the depolarizing effect in the Compton cross-section becomes dominant.

thumbnail Fig. 10.

As in Fig. 4, but for a fixed spectral image value of Γ = 1.85. The trend is similar to that found previously, although the differences are now dampened. The light green area represents the constraint from IXPE observations of NGC 4151, while the dark green area indicates the constraint resulting from the combination of IXPE observations and BLR reverberation. Both the constraints are given at the 68% confidence level.

thumbnail Fig. 11.

As in Fig. 5, but for a fixed spectral image value of Γ = 1.85. The trend is similar, although the differences are now dampened.

thumbnail Fig. 12.

As in Fig. 7, but for a fixed spectral index value of Γ = 1.85. The trend is similar, although the differences are now dampened.

Given the constraints on the polarization properties from the combined IXPE analysis (Gianolli et al. 2024) and the disk inclination from broad-line region reverberation studies (Bentz et al. 2022) of NGC 4151, we were able to differentiate between models that reproduce the observed characteristics and those that do not. Moreover, all tested configurations result in Ψ parallel to the disk axis, consistent with IXPE data. We then restricted the allowed polarization fraction values to those indicated by Gianolli et al. (2023) (i.e., primary continuum polarization fraction 7.1%±1.2%), and the allowed source inclination to 47° < θdisk < 66°, as indicated by Bentz et al. (2022). Both constraints are given at the 68% confidence level and define the green regions shown in Fig. 10, 11, 12 and 13.

thumbnail Fig. 13.

As in Fig. 8, but for a fixed spectral image value of Γ = 1.85. Here, Π increases up to kTe ∼ 75 keV due to a lower τ needed to reproduce Γ = 1.85, and then decreases because of the depolarizing effect of the Compton cross-section.

Comparing these constraints with the simulation results, we find that only a few configurations are able to reproduce the allowed Π values. Generally, we find that low opening angles, high spins, and discs partially entering the corona better reproduce the observed polarization properties. Figure 14 shows Ψ as a function of source inclination for those models that are able to reproduce the constraints on Π. Conversely, we can rule out a wedge corona model in the following scenarios:

  • null spin combined with a high inner disk radius and opening angles greater than 5° (left panel of Fig. 10);

  • null spin with 30° opening angles for all tested electron temperatures (left panel of Fig. 13);

  • maximal spin with high disk inner radii and opening angles exceeding 15° (right panel of Fig. 10);

  • maximal spin with high disk inner radii and α = 30° for every coronal temperature (right panel of Fig. 13);

  • maximal spin with inner disk radius reaching the ISCO and α = 30° (right panel of Fig. 11).

Among the tested configurations, the one that best reproduces the allowed polarimetric values is characterized by kTe = 60 keV, a = 0.998, Rdisk = 12 RG, and α = 30° (see the right panels of Figs. 11 and 12). This particular configuration is compatible with the polarimetric constraints over a wider range of inclinations than any of the other scenarios considered.

thumbnail Fig. 14.

Polarization angle (Ψ), summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination of the source, for models consistent with the constraints from IXPE analyses and BLR reverberation studies. For all models shown, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and the coronal inner radius is set to the ISCO radius corresponding to the BH spin (Rcorona = 6RG when a = 0 and Rcorona = 1.24RG when a = 0.998).

It is worth noting that the best-fit configuration for NGC 4151, derived from IXPE, NuSTAR, and XMM-Newton data and producing a maximally spinning BH with kTe ∼ 60 keV (Gianolli et al. 2024), is also, within this work, one of the most compatible with the polarimetric and inclination constraints established for this source. We emphasize that this does not imply that the ultimate model has been found; rather, we have identified the most appropriate configuration from those evaluated here. Due to the extensive range of parameters, there may still be alternative physical and geometric configurations that can reproduce the observed data. Additionally, the constraints related to polarization and inclination are influenced by significant uncertainties. If we were to consider these at the 90% and 99% confidence levels instead of the 68% currently considered, there would be more configurations capable of fitting the data and a broader range of allowed parameter space.

5. Summary

Using the Monte Carlo ray-tracing code MONK, we investigated how the spectro-polarimetric properties of the AGN primary continuum in the 2 − 8 keV energy band depend on the physical and geometric parameters of the wedge corona model. We find that both the primary continuum spectral index and the polarization degree vary with the coronal opening angle, temperature, optical depth, BH spin, and the AD inner radius. In contrast, in all tested cases, the polarization angle was parallel to the AD axis, as is generally found for radially extended coronal models.

In particular, we explored:

  • different values of the wedge opening angle (5°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°), observing a hardening of the 2 − 8 keV spectrum and a decreasing polarization degree when moving to higher openings;

  • different disk inner radii (equal to the coronal external radius, going down to half the coronal depth and close to the ISCO). In this case, we found a softening of the spectrum and an increasing polarization degree for lower values of Rdisk;

  • different BH spin values (null and maximum), observing a softening of the spectrum and an increasing polarization fraction for highly rotating BHs;

  • a range of coronal electrons temperatures (25, 60, 75, 100, 200, 300, and 400 keV). We report a hardening of the spectrum and a decrease of the polarization degree at higher temperatures;

  • various coronal optical depths (0.5, 1, 1.9, 2.5, 5, and 10). We also observed a hardening of the spectrum and a decrease of the polarization degree with increasing values of τ.

Finally, we fine-tuned the coronal optical depth in order to reproduce the spectral index of NGC 4151, the only radio-quiet unobscured AGN with robust X-ray polarization detection by IXPE to date. Comparing the simulations with the IXPE results allowed us to exclude many configurations of the wedge model. We found that configurations with high spins and disks partially entering the corona better reproduce the observed polarization properties. The configuration that meets the polarimetric constraints across the widest range of inclinations is characterized by kTe = 60 keV, a = 0.998, Rdisk = 12 RG, and α = 30°. This configuration aligns with the best-fit model found for NGC 4151 established through prior spectroscopic analysis. To help readers navigate the extensive parameter space and allow facile comparison between the presented figures, we summarize the full set of model parameters in Table A.1.

Acknowledgments

The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) is a joint US and Italian mission. The US contribution is supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and led and managed by its Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), with industry partner Ball Aerospace (contract NNM15AA18C). DT, AG, SB, GM, and FU acknowledge financial support by the Italian Space Agency (Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, ASI) through the contract ASI-INAF-2022-19-HH.0. VEG acknowledges funding under NASA contract 80NSSC24K1403. WZ acknowledges NSFC grants 12333004, and support by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant no. XDB0550200.

References

  1. Antonucci, R. R. J., & Cohen, R. D. 1983, ApJ, 271, 564 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beloborodov, A. M. 2017, ApJ, 850, 141 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bentz, M. C., Denney, K. D., Cackett, E. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 651, 775 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bentz, M. C., Williams, P. R., & Treu, T. 2022, ApJ, 934, 168 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beuchert, T., Markowitz, A. G., Dauser, T., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A50 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caballero-García, M. D., Papadakis, I. E., Dovčiak, M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 3184 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cackett, E. M., Zoghbi, A., Reynolds, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 2980 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chandrasekhar, S. 1960, Radiative Transfer (New York: Dover) [Google Scholar]
  9. Dadina, M. 2007, A&A, 461, 1209 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Rosa, A., Panessa, F., Bassani, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2087 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Esin, A. A., McClintock, J. E., & Narayan, R. 1997, ApJ, 489, 865 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Esin, A. A., Narayan, R., Cui, W., Grove, J. E., & Zhang, S.-N. 1998, ApJ, 505, 854 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fabian, A. C., Alston, W. N., Cackett, E. M., et al. 2017, Astron. Nachr., 338, 269 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghisellini, G., Haardt, F., & Matt, G. 2004, A&A, 413, 535 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gianolli, V. E., Kim, D. E., Bianchi, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 4468 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gianolli, V. E., Bianchi, S., Kammoun, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haardt, F., & Maraschi, L. 1991, ApJ, 380, L51 [Google Scholar]
  18. Haardt, F., & Maraschi, L. 1993, ApJ, 413, 507 [Google Scholar]
  19. Henri, G., & Petrucci, P. O. 1997, A&A, 326, 87 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ingram, A., Ewing, M., Marinucci, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 5437 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamraj, N., Brightman, M., Harrison, F. A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 42 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keck, M. L., Brenneman, L. W., Ballantyne, D. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 149 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liang, E. P. T. 1979, ApJ, 231, L111 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lightman, A. P., & Zdziarski, A. A. 1987, ApJ, 319, 643 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Malizia, A., Molina, M., Bassani, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 782, L25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marinucci, A., Tamborra, F., Bianchi, S., et al. 2018, Galaxies, 6, 44 [Google Scholar]
  27. Marinucci, A., Muleri, F., Dovciak, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 5907 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Matt, G., Feroci, M., Rapisarda, M., & Costa, E. 1996, Rad. Phys. Chem., 48, 403 [Google Scholar]
  29. Middei, R., Bianchi, S., Marinucci, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A131 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Novikov, I. D., & Thorne, K. S. 1973, in Black Holes, eds. C. Dewitt, & B. S. Dewitt, 343 [Google Scholar]
  31. Penston, M. V., & Perez, E. 1984, MNRAS, 211, 33P [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Petrucci, P.-O., Ferreira, J., Henri, G., & Pelletier, G. 2008, MNRAS, 385, L88 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Poutanen, J. 1994, ApJS, 92, 607 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Poutanen, J., & Svensson, R. 1996, ApJ, 470, 249 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Poutanen, J., Veledina, A., & Zdziarski, A. A. 2018, A&A, 614, A79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  36. Puccetti, S., Fiore, F., Risaliti, G., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 607 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schnittman, J. D., & Krolik, J. H. 2010, ApJ, 712, 908 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Serafinelli, R., Marinucci, A., De Rosa, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3540 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shapiro, S. L., Lightman, A. P., & Eardley, D. M. 1976, ApJ, 204, 187 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shapovalova, A. I., Popović, L. Č., Collin, S., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 99 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shapovalova, A. I., Popovic, L. C., Collin, S., et al. 2012, AAT, 27, 429 [Google Scholar]
  43. Stern, B. E., Poutanen, J., Svensson, R., Sikora, M., & Begelman, M. C. 1995, ApJ, 449, L13 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sunyaev, R. A., & Titarchuk, L. G. 1980, A&A, 86, 121 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tagliacozzo, D., Marinucci, A., Ursini, F., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 4735 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tamborra, F., Matt, G., Bianchi, S., & Dovčiak, M. 2018, A&A, 619, A105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tortosa, B. S., Marinucci, A., Matt, G., & Petrucci, P. O. 2018, A&A, 614, A37 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ursini, F., Matt, G., Bianchi, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3674 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Uttley, P., Cackett, E. M., Fabian, A. C., Kara, E., & Wilkins, D. R. 2014, A&ARv, 22, 72 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Weisskopf, M. C., Soffitta, P., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, J. Astron. Telescopes Instrum. Syst., 8, 026002 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, W., Dovčiak, M., & Bursa, M. 2019, ApJ, 875, 148 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Appendix A: Simulations parameters summary

Table A.1.

Summary table listing the full set of model parameters for each figure.

All Tables

Table A.1.

Summary table listing the full set of model parameters for each figure.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Wedge corona model geometry, characterized by an inner (Rin) and an outer (Rout) radius and an opening angle (α), measured from the AD plane. In the left configuration, the inner radius of the AD coincides with the outer radius of the corona, while in the right configuration it extends into the corona itself. The R and z axes represent the radial and the vertical coordinates, respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Primary continuum normalized flux as a function of photons energy (2 − 8 keV) for different wedge opening angles (α) in the baseline configuration. The parameters are: Rcorona = 6RG, Rdisk = 25RG, kTe = 60 keV, and τ = 1.9. As the opening angle increases, the spectral index (Γ) of the nuclear emission drops, leading to harder spectra.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Polarization angle (Ψ), summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination of the source (cos θdisk = 1 corresponds to the face-on view), assuming different wedge opening angles (α) in the same configuration as in Fig. 2. The polarization angle, Ψ, is generally parallel to the AD axis, except for α = 60° (dotted purple line).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

Polarization fraction (Π), summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination of the source, assuming different wedge opening angles. In both panels, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and Rdisk = 25RG. The left panel corresponds to the a = 0 and Rcorona = 6RG scenario, while the right panel corresponds to a = 0.998 and Rcorona = 1.24RG scenario. As the opening angle increases, Π decreases due to the increasing degree of symmetry of the system.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for the AD internal radius (Rdisk) in the baseline configuration. In both panels, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and the wedge opening angle to α = 30°. The left panel shows the a = 0 and Rcorona = 6RG scenario. The difference between Rdisk = 12RG and Rdisk = 6RG is small. The right panel shows the a = 0.998 and Rcorona = 1.24RG scenario. Here, the difference between Rdisk = 12RG and Rdisk = 1.24RG is much higher.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6.

Normalized flux as a function of photon scattering number, summed over the 2 − 8 keV energy band. The coronal parameters are the same as in Fig. 5 (left panel). As shown, the dominant scattering level decreases for lower values of Rdisk.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for BH spin. In both panels, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and the inner radius of the corona is set to the ISCO value of the corresponding spin configuration. The left panel compares BH spins with Rdisk = 25RG for different wedge opening angles (α). The right panel compares BH spins for different values of the inner radius of the AD (Rdisk). The Π increases with increasing spin.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for the coronal temperature. In both panels, the wedge opening angle is set to α = 30°, the inner radius of the corona is set to the ISCO value of the corresponding spin configuration, and the inner radius of the AD is fixed at Rdisk = 25RG. The left panel shows the a = 0 and Rcorona = 6RG scenario. The right panel shows the: a = 0.998 and Rcorona = 1.24RG scenario. When the temperature increases, Π decreases due to electrons motion randomization.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9.

As in Fig. 4, but assuming different values for coronal optical depth (τ). In both panels, the wedge opening angle is set to α = 30°, the spin of the BH is set to a = 0, the inner radius of the corona is set to Rcorona = 6RG, and the inner radius of the AD to Rdisk = 25RG. When τ decreases, Π increases.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10.

As in Fig. 4, but for a fixed spectral image value of Γ = 1.85. The trend is similar to that found previously, although the differences are now dampened. The light green area represents the constraint from IXPE observations of NGC 4151, while the dark green area indicates the constraint resulting from the combination of IXPE observations and BLR reverberation. Both the constraints are given at the 68% confidence level.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11.

As in Fig. 5, but for a fixed spectral image value of Γ = 1.85. The trend is similar, although the differences are now dampened.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 12.

As in Fig. 7, but for a fixed spectral index value of Γ = 1.85. The trend is similar, although the differences are now dampened.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 13.

As in Fig. 8, but for a fixed spectral image value of Γ = 1.85. Here, Π increases up to kTe ∼ 75 keV due to a lower τ needed to reproduce Γ = 1.85, and then decreases because of the depolarizing effect of the Compton cross-section.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 14.

Polarization angle (Ψ), summed between 2 and 8 keV, as a function of the inclination of the source, for models consistent with the constraints from IXPE analyses and BLR reverberation studies. For all models shown, the coronal temperature is set to kTe = 60 keV and the coronal inner radius is set to the ISCO radius corresponding to the BH spin (Rcorona = 6RG when a = 0 and Rcorona = 1.24RG when a = 0.998).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.