Open Access
Table 2.
Best-fit parameters and uncertainties for the ΣSFR-ΣCII relation derived from the different fitting methods described in Sect. 3.2.
| Fitting Method | log(C0)a | β | σi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood Model + L-BFGS-B integration | |||
| Original Fit | 0.30 | 0.87 | 0.19 |
| Source Bootstrapping |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Noise Sampling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Hybrid Resampling |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Likelihood Model + MCMC | |||
| Original Likelihood | 0.30 | 0.87 | 0.19 |
| Normalised Likelihood |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Linmix | |||
| All Pixels | 0.37 | 0.92 | 0.18 |
| Region Averages (B23) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Notes. Parameter uncertainties, when given, were computed using the 16th, 50th, and 84th percentiles of the associated distributions.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.














