Table 1.
Summary of our population synthesis runs, best match shaded with colour.
| SFR | SF for | QHe II | L1550 | Source of C IV emission | QH I | I(4686) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M⊙ yr−1] | [Myr] | [ph. s−1] | [erg s−1] | [ph. s−1] | /I(Hβ) | ||
| fiducial | 0.1 | 3 | 1.80⋅1050 | 3.71⋅1037 | one/two WOs of > 90 M⊙ | 7.02⋅1052 | 0.004 |
![]() |
↪ NE: 0.69⋅1050 | ↪ NE: 6.21⋅1052 | |||||
| ↪ CHE: 1.11⋅1050 | ↪ CHE: 0.81⋅1052 | ||||||
| SF-10 | 0.03 | 10 | 1.96⋅1050 | 3.43⋅1037 | six WOs of 40 M⊙ | 3.15⋅1052 | 0.011 |
![]() |
↪ NE: 0.14⋅1050 | & one of 80 M⊙ | ↪ NE: 2.62⋅1052 | ||||
| ↪ CHE: 1.82⋅1050 | ↪ CHE: 0.53⋅1052 | ||||||
| SF-15 | 0.02 | 15 | 2.19⋅1050 | 2.83⋅1037 | ∼twenty WOs of 25 M⊙ | 2.23⋅1052 | 0.017 |
![]() |
↪ NE: 0.09⋅1050 | & two of 50 M⊙ | ↪ NE: 1.75⋅1052 | ||||
| ↪ CHE: 2.10⋅1050 | ↪ CHE: 0.48⋅1052 | ||||||
| SF-15-80 | 0.02 | 15 | 1.94⋅1050 | 2.15⋅1037 | seventeen WOs of 20 M⊙ | 1.96⋅1052 | 0.017 |
![]() |
↪ NE: 0.06⋅1050 | & ∼four of 40 M⊙ | ↪ NE: 1.53⋅1052 | ||||
| ↪ CHE: 1.88⋅1050 | ↪ CHE: 0.43⋅1052 | ||||||
| SF-15-40 | 0.02 | 15 | 1.31⋅1050 | 0.91⋅1037 | seventeen WOs of 20 M⊙ | 1.38⋅1052 | 0.016 |
![]() |
↪ NE: 0.01⋅1050 | & ∼three of 30 M⊙ | ↪ NE: 1.07⋅1052 | ||||
| ↪ CHE: 1.30⋅1050 | ↪ CHE: 0.31⋅1052 | ||||||
Notes. All runs assumed a Salpeter IMF with Mtop ≤ 150 M⊙ (see label) and 10% of stars rotating fast enough for chemically homogeneous evolution. The total size of the region formed is 3⋅105 M⊙ in all cases. For reference, the observed values are Q
= 1.33⋅1050 photons s−1 and L
= 2.2–5.5⋅1037 erg s−1. Our results from most runs are able to account for these, regardless of the various assumptions about the star-formation history and thus, the stellar content. The fiducial case mimics the scenario in Paper I (details are given in Sect. 2.3), while the others relax the SFR, lower the Mtop, and lengthen the age of the population, meaning later phases of lower-mass models are captured. This is why the source of the stellar C IV emission gets less and less extreme: after the third case, no very massive star (VMS) is needed at all. As for the observed hardness, i.e. the relative intensity of I(4686)/I(H[[INLINE286]]) = A⋅Q(He II)/Q(H I), it should be between 0.02−0.04 observationally, which renders our third population most consistent with measurements (including the C IV line luminosity, which becomes lower with smaller Mtop) and thus most favoured, as explained in Sect. 3.2 (also see Fig. 7).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.




