Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 704, December 2025
Article Number A74
Number of page(s) 13
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556399
Published online 03 December 2025

© The Authors 2025

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

1 Introduction

In dense interstellar clouds, radiation drives physical and chemical processes in molecular ices on dust grains. Carbon monoxide (CO) is a key component of these ices, freezing out as a non-polar layer on top of water-rich ice layers in the denser parts of molecular clouds where grain temperatures reach as low as 10 K. Interactions with radiation and atomic species promote chemistry within the icy mantles through the formation of radicals, which can recombine to produce larger molecules, including interstellar complex organic molecules (COMs). For example, hydrogen addition reactions in the CO ice layer have experimentally been shown to lead to the formation of methanol (CH3OH) and species as large as simple sugars and sugar alcohols (Fuchs et al. 2009; Fedoseev et al. 2017). For more complex, mixed ices, both hydrogen addition and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation have been shown to result in a range of biologically relevant species such as amino acids, sugars, and fatty acids (Ioppolo et al. 2021; Öberg 2016; Muñoz Caro et al. 2002; Meinert et al. 2016; Nuevo et al. 2011). The observation of gas-phase COMs in low-temperature regions where grain temperatures are too low to lead to thermal desorption of such species indicates the need for additional non-thermal desorption mechanisms (Cernicharo et al. 2012; Guzmán et al. 2013; Vastel et al. 2014; Perotti et al. 2020; Evans et al. 2025). Non-thermal desorption has similarly been invoked to explain observations of rotationally cold gas-phase CO in low-temperature regions (e.g. Willacy & Langer 2000; Piétu et al. 2007; Öberg et al. 2015). Radiation-induced desorption processes are of great interest in this regard, providing a crucial link between the condensed phase molecular repository found in interstellar ices and the interstellar gas-phase.

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation has been shown to induce desorption of species such as CO, CH3OH, CH4, and CH3CN from the 10 K icy grain mantles (Öberg et al. 2009; Fayolle et al. 2011; Bertin et al. 2012, 2016; Dupuy et al. 2017; Basalgète et al. 2021). However, while UV radiation is abundant in many regions of the interstellar medium (ISM), the UV component of the interstellar radiation field (ISRF) is strongly attenuated within dense, interstellar clouds beyond AV ∼ 3 (Mathis et al. 1983). Instead, secondary UV photons from cosmic-ray induced excitation of H2 molecules are the only source of UV radiation, with an estimated flux on the order of 104 photons cm−2 s−1 integrated across the UV spectral range (Cecchi-Pestellini & Aiello 1992; Shen et al. 2004). The infrared (IR) component of the ISRF is less shielded and thus dominates inside dense clouds, with the photon flux estimated to typically be on the order of 109 photons cm−2 s−1 or higher for all wavelengths in the 1–10 µm range (Mathis et al. 1983; Porter & Strong 2005; Roueff et al. 2013). While UV irradiation of icy grain analogues has been investigated extensively, the effects of IR radiation on such ices have received less attention. Beyond its role in radiative transport, the influence of IR radiation on condensed-phase chemistry and physical effects such as ice restructuring and desorption remains poorly understood. The abundance of IR radiation, combined with the strong IR absorbance of common interstellar ice species such as H2O and CO, makes these processes highly relevant for astrochemistry studies.

IR irradiation has been shown to promote ice restructuring, leading to a more ordered structure, for instance, for amorphous solid water (ASW; Noble et al. 2014a,b, 2020a; Cuppen et al. 2022; Coussan et al. 2015, 2022) and CO2 (Ioppolo et al. 2022). IR-induced desorption has been found to occur for crystalline H2O ice (Noble et al. 2020a; Krasnopoler & George 19980000; Focsa et al. 2003) and CO from CO–H2O mixtures following excitation of H2O vibrational modes (Ingman et al. 2023). Recently, we used the FELIX IR Free Electron Laser (FEL) FEL-2 to investigate the IR-induced CO photodesorption from CO on ASW (Slumstrup et al. 2025), simulating the simple CO and H2O layered ices in interstellar clouds. By employing a combination of IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometric detection of desorbing molecules, we demonstrated that excitation of the stretching mode of CO leads only to inefficient CO desorption for both pure CO ice and CO on ASW. In contrast, excitation of vibrational modes of the underlying ASW resulted in efficient CO desorption and even some desorption of the H2O itself. These results suggest that indirect non-thermal desorption, where energy absorbed by one species triggers the desorption of another, may play a significant role in the release of volatile species such as CO.

Another important class of interstellar molecules that absorb strongly in the IR is the family of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Indeed, they are abundantly detected in the gas-phase through their strong mid-IR emission following UV excitation with characteristic features at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.2, 12.7, and 16.4 µm (Tielens 2008). PAHs can be considered as an extension of the size distribution of interstellar carbonaceous dust grains to the molecular scale and are estimated to account for 10–20% of the galactic carbon budget (Joblin & Tielens 2011). As such, they are suggested to play an important role in the physics and chemistry of the ISM. PAHs have been shown to act as catalysts, for example, in the formation of H2 (Rauls & Hornekær 2008; Thrower et al. 2012; Mennella et al. 2012; Cazaux et al. 2016; Jensen et al. 2019) in radiation-dominated regions of the ISM where dust grain formation routes are inefficient to explain the observed H2 abundances (Habart et al. 2003). The formation of H2 takes place through the addition to and abstraction of H atoms from the PAHs, leading to the formation of superhydrogenated PAHs (HPAHs) which are also detected in the ISM through, for instance, their 3.4 and 6.9 µm emission features (Sloan et al. 1997; Steglich et al. 2013; Sandford et al. 2013). The range of strong vibrational modes of PAHs and their derivatives makes them well-suited for studying their interaction with IR radiation. In interstellar clouds, PAHs are expected to freeze out onto the dust grains (Chiar et al. 2021), either becoming part of the grains themselves before ice formation or becoming embedded in the icy mantles. Based on observations, it is estimated that interstellar ices could contain PAH-related molecules at the 2–3% level relative to water (Bouwman et al. 2011b). Here, PAHs contribute to the solid-state chemical complexity through interactions with UV radiation and protons, leading to HPAHs and the addition of other functional groups (Bouwman et al. 2011b; Bernstein et al. 1999, Bernstein et al. 2003; Gudipati & Yang 2012; Noble et al. 2020b). In these studies, PAHs have mainly been considered as interacting with H2O. However, PAHs have limited collision rates with the icy grains because of their low concentration and mobility in the gas phase, thereby making it unlikely that they fully freeze out in the H2O rich ice layer, according to the model from Bouwman et al. (2011a). For that reason, PAHs can be expected to also freeze out later in the cloud lifetime, where the CO-rich ice layer forms on the grains. It is therefore relevant to consider whether IR absorption by PAH molecules in close proximity to CO molecules could be driving CO desorption.

In this work, we extend our study of IR-induced photodesorption of CO to mixed and layered ices containing CO and PAHs, using a superhydrogenated form of pyrene (C16H10). Pyrene is known to exist in the ISM as it has recently been detected in a dense cloud through its cyano-derivatives (Wenzel et al. 2024, 2025b). Pyrene is also found in Solar System bodies such as meteorites (Sephton 2002) and asteroids (Naraoka et al. 2023; Zeichner et al. 2023), which are considered remnants of the early Solar System. Pyrene is well-studied experimentally, for instance, in scenarios where it is embedded in H2O ices (Hardegree-Ullman et al. 2014; Chiar et al. 2021), where photo-processing was found to lead to superhydrogenated and ionised pyrenes, as well as oxygen-containing derivatives (Bouwman et al. 2011b; Cuylle et al. 2014; Cook et al. 2015). Fully superhy-drogenated pyrene, perhydropyrene (PHP, C16H26), was chosen as an analogue in this work because of its strong aliphatic C-H stretching vibrational modes at 3.42 µm, which allow for strong absorption at high photon energies. These vibrational modes also have the advantage that they do not overlap with any modes of H2O and, hence, related studies with H2O-containing ices are able to examine the excitation of PHP without exciting any H2O modes in the process. In particular, we have examined the excitation of both PHP and CO in two systems, CO:PHP mixed ice and CO on PHP layered ice. In the mixed system, PHP acts as an analogue for large cyclic hydrocarbon molecules such as (H)PAHs embedded in CO ice. In the layered ice system, PHP acts as an analogue for hydrogenated carbonaceous dust grains. We show that efficient CO photodesorption occurs following excitation of PHP in both systems and derive photodesorption cross-sections and yields. We discuss the astrophysical implications of these results, which indicate a potential role of IR radiation in determining the ice-gas balance of dense clouds and in governing the complex chemistry occurring within them.

2 Experimental details

The experiments described in this work were performed at the Laboratory Ice Surface Astrophysics (LISA) ultra-high vacuum (UHV) end-station at the HFML-FELIX facility in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, during a beamshift in June 2024. The setup is described in detail in the literature (Ioppolo et al. 2022; Schrauwen et al. 2024). In brief, the LISA end-station consists of a UHV chamber with a base pressure of approximately 5 × 10−10 mbar during cryostat operation with the sample at its base temperature. Ices were grown on a gold-plated copper substrate attached to the cryostat. The temperature of the substrate was 9 K throughout ice formation and during experiments, measured with a silicon diode attached to the base of the substrate. Hexadecahydropyrene (C16H26), commonly known as PHP (TCI Europe; purity >97%), was introduced to the chamber via a fine leak valve and home-built stainless steel dosing tube directed at the sample with a tube-to-sample distance of ∼ 5 cm. It is a low-vapour-pressure liquid at room temperature and was purified through pumping cycles with a dedicated high-vacuum pumping station to remove air and water. CO (Linde HiQ grade; purity 99.997%) was deposited through background deposition. The CO:PHP mixed ice was grown through co-deposition of CO and PHP for 2000 s to ensure effective mixing of the species, with a total chamber pressure of 6 × 10−8 mbar, where PHP and CO accounted for approximately 2×10−10 and 5 × 10−8 mbar, respectively. For the layered ice, the deposition parameters for the two species were chosen such that the amounts deposited were similar to the mixed ice. PHP was dosed for 1000 s at double the rate used for the mixed ice, as determined through its partial pressure in the chamber, monitored by a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS; Hiden Analytical Hiden HAL/3F RC PIC). Subsequently, CO was dosed on top of the PHP for 1400 s at a total chamber pressure of 7 × 10−8 mbar. These deposition procedures resulted in around 19 layers of CO and a CO-to-PHP ratio of ∼10 on the surface, as detailed in the following. Under these deposition conditions, CO was deposited as an amorphous ice (Kouchi et al. 2021) and we would expect the same for the PHP.

Reflection-Absorption IR Spectroscopy (RAIRS) was used to monitor ice growth and the effects of FEL irradiation. The RAIRS set-up consists of a Bruker Vertex 80v Fourier Transform IR (FTIR) spectrometer with the IR beam interfaced to the UHV chamber. The IR beam is incident at a grazing angle of 10 to the substrate surface. An aperture of 1 mm was used, resulting in a RAIRS spot size on the surface of 0.92 cm2 as detailed in Appendix A. RAIR spectra were recorded in the 5000–500 cm−1 range with a resolution of 0.5 cm−1, and averaged through the co-addition of 128 or 256 scans. All spectra were baselined with a global cubic spline prior to plotting and analysis, and local straight baselines are used for integration of peaks.

Following deposition, the ices were irradiated using the free electron laser FEL-2, which is tunable in the wavelength range of 2.7–45 µm. The FEL-2 beam is monochromatic with a spectral FWHM estimated to be ∼0.8% δλ/λ. For our experiments, the beam consisted of a series of 6 µs long macropulses at a frequency of 5 Hz. Each macropulse comprised a train of micropulses with a repetition rate of 1 GHz. The micropulses were therefore spaced 1 ns apart. The p-polarised component of the FEL beam was incident on the substrate at an angle of 45 to the surface. The irradiation energy, Eirr, (i.e. the total energy of each macropulse) varied between irradiations in the range of 35–61 mJ. Ices were irradiated with the FEL-2 tuned to 3.42 µm and 4.67 µm, exciting the PHP CH stretching mode and CO stretching modes, respectively. Additionally, an off-resonance reference irradiation was performed at 4.02 µm for the mixed ice. The substrate can be moved vertically such that a series of pristine sample spots are available on the surface for irradiation. Each individual irradiation measurement was performed on a previously un-irradiated spot for a duration of 1 min. Subsequent irradiation of previously irradiated spots confirmed that no further changes were observed in the RAIR spectra.

The fluence of incident photons in each macropulse of FEL-2 is determined as ϕ=EirrEphotonrmacroSFEL,$\phi = {{{E_{{\rm{irr}}}}} \over {{E_{{\rm{photon}}}}}}{{{r_{{\rm{macro}}}}} \over {{S_{{\rm{FEL}}}}}},$(1) where Ephoton = hc/λ is the photon energy at wavelength, λ. The first fraction then corresponds to the number of photons in each macropulse, while rmacro = 5 Hz is the macropulse frequency and SFEL is the area of the irradiated spot on the substrate. This area varies with the irradiation wavelength, ranging from 0.0077 to 0.0143 cm2 for the irradiation wavelengths used in this work. In all cases, the irradiation spots are significantly smaller than the RAIRS spot, meaning that only a fraction of the ice observed with RAIRS was exposed to the FEL irradiation. More details are provided in Appendix A.

In addition to recording RAIR spectra prior to and after FEL irradiation, the QMS was used to directly detect species desorbing from the surface during irradiation. The QMS effective time resolution was optimised to 10 ms by restricting the mass filter to detect only CO (m/z = 28). The QMS has a processing period on the order of a few tenths of a ms associated with each measurement point during which it is not acquiring data, resulting in an incomplete recording of the full desorption event.

3 Results

3.1 RAIR spectra and composition of the as-deposited ices

The fully aliphatic form of pyrene, PHP, C16H26, was used as an analogue for large cyclic hydrocarbon molecules such as PAHs as well as hydrogenated carbonaceous grains. Its molecular structure is shown in Fig. 1a. Figure 1b depicts the RAIR spectrum of a mixed CO:PHP ice, deposited at 9 K on an Au-plated copper substrate. The spectrum of the layered ice is omitted for clarity, as the PHP bands exhibit no significant differences compared to the mixed ice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental IR spectrum of PHP obtained in the condensed phase. The spectrum is dominated by the aliphatic CH stretching modes at 3.4 and 3.5 µm, with weaker bending modes at 6.9 µm. These aliphatic bands are shifted from the corresponding aromatic bands of, for instance, pyrene and its partially hydrogenated derivatives such as hexahydropyrene (HHP, C16H16) at 3.3 and 7.0 µm (Chiar et al. 2021). The wavelengths of the PHP bands are consistent with the aliphatic bands of HHP (Chiar et al. 2021) and the general characteristic aliphatic modes of superhydrogenated PAHs (Sloan et al. 1997; Steglich et al. 2013; Sandford et al. 2013). There is no overlap between any bands of the CO and PHP across the mid-IR range. Coloured arrows in Fig. 1 indicate the wavelengths used for FEL irradiations of the ices. These correspond to the strongest aliphatic CH stretch of PHP at 3.42 µm (2920 cm−1; blue arrow) and the CO stretching mode at 4.67 µm (2140 cm−1; red arrow). The mixed ice was also irradiated at an off-resonance reference wavelength of 4.02 µm (2490 cm−1). We use this colour scheme throughout the paper. The irradiation wavelengths are summarised in Table 1.

The amount of each ice component is determined through the column density, N, found from the integrated absorbance, ∫ Abs, of an IR band with respect to wavenumber, v˜${\tilde v}$, and the transmission band strength, Aband, using N=ln10Abs(v˜)dv˜Aband ×4.5.$N = \ln 10{{\mathop \smallint \nolimits^ Abs(\tilde v){\rm{d}}\tilde v} \over {{A_{{\rm{band}}}} \times 4.5}}.$(2)

The sensitivity enhancement from RAIRS relative to transmission IR is taken into account by the factor of 4.5, computed for CO and ASW ices at the LISA set-up. The details of this can be found in our previous work (Slumstrup et al. 2025). For the CO band at 4.67 µm, a transmission IR band strength of Aband = 1.12×10−17 cm/molecule for pure CO is used (Bouilloud et al. 2015). We estimated a band strength of Aband = 1.53 × 10−16 cm/molecule for the combined CH stretching bands of PHP based on comparison with RAIRS and QMS measurements of pyrene at the LISA set-up, as there are no published values for PHP. More details are given in Appendix B.

Table 1 reports the derived column densities for the two CO-PHP ice systems. The column densities of CO and PHP are similar for the two ices, with a CO-to-PHP ratio of ∼10. Assuming a typical molecular layer density for small molecules of 1015 cm−2, both ices contain around 19 layers of CO. For the larger PHP molecule, we approximated a layer density of 0.26 × 1015 cm−2 based on its molecular geometry as discussed in Appendix B. Accordingly, we determine that both ice systems contain around seven layers of PHP. For the layered system, this means that no CO molecules are expected to be in contact with the Au-plated copper substrate.

thumbnail Fig. 1

(a) Structure of perhydropyrene (PHP, C16H26), the fully superhydrogenated version of pyrene. (b) RAIR spectrum of the CO:PHP mixed ice. The main spectral features are marked, and coloured arrows indicate the irradiation wavelengths: the strongest CH stretch of PHP at 3.42 µm (blue) and the CO stretching mode at 4.67 µm (red).

Table 1

Overview of the experiments performed in this work with column densities, N, and irradiation wavelengths, λFEL, for each ice.

3.2 QMS detection of IR-induced CO desorption

Figure 2 shows the CO desorption detected with the QMS during FEL irradiation exciting the CO and PHP vibrational modes for the mixed and layered ices. Desorption traces have been base-lined to the average level of the CO signal prior to irradiation and offset from each other for clarity. Each individual desorption peak corresponds to a 5 Hz macropulse of the FEL. All irradiations were continued for 1 min, although most desorption occurred within the initial ∼10 s seconds, as evident from Fig. 2. All irradiations were performed on spots of the ices with similar CO-to-PHP ratios of ∼ 10. Irradiation energies, Eirr, are denoted above each trace with variations arising due to the varying performance of the FEL during the beamshift. To facilitate comparison of the desorption data for the two ices, the desorption trace for exciting the PHP mode for the layered ice in Fig. 2 has been scaled by a factor of two-thirds to account for the higher irradiation energy. This irradiation still shows the most significant CO desorption signal. The remaining figures and analysis of this irradiation use the non-scaled data.

As expected, the QMS signal shows no CO desorption from the ices before the start of irradiation. Similarly, the 4.02 µm off-resonance irradiation for the mixed ice resulted in no CO desorption, as shown in Appendix C. Irradiating at 4.67 µm, corresponding to the CO mode, (red traces in Fig. 2) results in a weak desorption signal from the mixed ice. No CO desorption was observed for excitation of the CO mode for the layered ice. This indicates that direct excitation of CO molecules is not efficient in driving CO desorption. Therefore, there must be alternative, non-desorptive pathways for the dissipation of energy absorbed directly by CO molecules. For both the mixed and layered ices, irradiation at 3.42 µm, corresponding to the PHP mode (blue traces in Fig. 2), leads to significant CO desorption, with the strongest desorption for the layered ice. This indicates that energy transfer occurs between the two species despite them having no spectral overlap of vibrational modes in the mid-IR range, as illustrated in Fig. 1. In the case of the mixed CO:PHP ice, a fraction of CO molecules is likely trapped beneath PHP molecules, reducing the desorption efficiency, consistent with the difference in CO desorption seen in Fig. 2. For the layered ice, most of the CO molecules are not in direct contact with a PHP molecule. The strong desorption signal therefore indicates that energy can transfer through the CO layers to the vacuum interface. The individual desorption peaks are shown in detail in Appendix C, along with a description of the integration process used in the following.

To determine the desorption rate for irradiation at 3.42 µm, resonant with the PHP mode, we integrated the CO desorption signal for each macropulse, for both the mixed and layered ices shown in Fig. 2. The integration process is described in Appendix C. The resulting integrated CO desorption signal is then plotted as a function of irradiation time in Fig. 3. In this case, no scaling has been applied to the desorption data for the layered ice. The desorption signals appear to decay exponentially with time, indicating a first-order desorption process with respect to NCO. This behaviour has previously been observed for IR-induced CO desorption from CO on H2O (Slumstrup et al. 2025) and CO-H2O mixtures (Ingman et al. 2023) following excitation of various H2O vibrational modes. First-order desorption kinetics are typically associated with desorption from a monolayer of adsorbate, where the desorption rate depends on the remaining coverage. The apparent first-order desorption kinetics for our thicker ice layers is therefore surprising. For the mixed ice, this might indicate that a limited population of the adsorbed CO ice can desorb. For the layered ice, the effective CO ice thickness will depend on the roughness of the deposited PHP layer. A rough surface would have a larger surface area and, therefore, the CO would be more thinly spread over the surface, potentially resulting in first-order desorption kinetics. Further measurements probing the dependence of the CO desorption efficiency on the thickness of both ice layers and mixing ratio are clearly necessary. Nevertheless, we can use first-order desorption kinetics to determine the desorption efficiency for the specific ices considered in this study. Ingman et al. (2023) found that two decay components were necessary to fit their experimental data, attributing the presence of fast and slow decay components to different desorption processes. We followed a similar approach in our analysis of the present data. The resulting decays are fitted with a bi-exponential decay function of the form, I(t)=I1exp(tτ1)+I2exp(tτ2)+I,$I(t) = {I_1}\exp \left( {{{ - t} \over {{\tau _1}}}} \right) + {I_2}\exp \left( {{{ - t} \over {{\tau _2}}}} \right) + {I_\infty },$(3)

where I(t) is the integrated desorption signal at time t, I1, I2 are the initial signals at t = 0 and τ1 and τ2 are the time constants for the fast and slow components, respectively. The residual baseline QMS signal intensity, I, is included to account for a slight nonzero background level at long times. The time constants for the fast and slow desorption processes are given by τi = 1/ (ϕσi) where σi is the desorption cross-section in cm2 and ϕ is the photon flux in cm−2 s−1. Per convention, the decay is expressed in terms of time rather than pulse count, but since the experimental photon fluxes also take the pulsed nature of the irradiation into account, this does not change the resulting cross-sections. The resulting fits are shown as solid lines in Fig. 3.

Table 2 shows the resulting time constants τi from the fits, along with the relevant photon fluxes ϕ. In addition, the corresponding photodesorption cross-sections for the slow process, σ2, for each irradiation, are given. For both ices, τ2 is significantly larger than τ1, with the fast process occurring on a subsecond timescale, while the slow process occurs over several seconds. For both processes, the desorption from the layered ice is considerably more efficient than from the mixed. Although the two-component exponential decay function in general fits the experimental data well, for the layered ice the fit is insensitive to the exact value of τ1. We attribute this to the actual time constant being of the same order as the time between successive macropulses and thus consider the value quoted an upper limit. Because of this, no reliable desorption cross-sections for the fast process can be reported. For both ices, it is clear that there is some residual desorption intensity, I, as some weak desorption peaks are seen throughout the irradiation period. This could be attributed to a combination of the continued slow desorption process or, for instance, from a small thermal desorption component. Continued CO desorption could also occur from a continuous re-filling of desorption sites either from diffusion into the irradiated area or a small amount of re-deposition from the gas phase. For both irradiations resonant with the PHP mode, we performed a second equivalent irradiation on the same spot to check for any long-term effects. In both cases, only a few desorption peaks at the level of I were observed. Our results indicate that significantly more CO desorbs, per photon, following the excitation of the PHP mode in the layered compared to the mixed ices, despite the similar initial amounts of CO. A comparison of the cross-sections for the slow process, specifically, shows that the probability for photodesorption of CO following a PHP excitation is around three times higher for the layered than for the mixed ice.

thumbnail Fig. 2

CO desorption signals detected by the QMS for m/z = 28 during irradiations of the mixed CO:PHP and layered CO/PHP ices, baselined and offset for clarity. Irradiation energies, Eirr, are denoted above each spectrum. For better visual comparison, the desorption trace for the PHP mode irradiation of the layered ice with higher irradiation energy has been scaled by a factor of two-thirds. Each individual desorption peak corresponds to a 5 Hz macropulse of the FEL. The zero-time for irradiation is defined as the onset of the first CO desorption peak.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Bi-exponential fits to the integrated CO desorption signals derived from the data presented in Fig. 2, for the 3.42 µm irradiation of the mixed (top panel) and layered (bottom panel) CO-PHP systems. The data for the layered ice has not been scaled.

Table 2

CO desorption time constants, τ, and photodesorption cross-sections for the slow desorption process, σ2.

3.3 Quantification of CO desorption through RAIRS

The total amount of CO desorbed during any given irradiation can be determined by considering the IR spectral changes. Figure 4 shows the RAIR spectra around the CO stretching band at 2140 cm−1 for (a) the CO:PHP mixed and (b) the CO/PHP layered ice together with the difference spectra corresponding to irradiation at (3.42 µm) and (4.67 µm), exciting the PHP and CO modes, respectively. In addition, difference spectra for the off-resonance irradiation (4.02 µm) of the mixed ice and an equivalent waiting period without irradiation for the layered ice are also shown. The shape of the CO band is dependent on the local environment of the CO molecules. For the layered ice, the band closely resembles that of pure CO (Slumstrup et al. 2025). This confirms that most of the CO molecules in the layer are not in direct contact with PHP, indicating that the PHP layer has a low porosity. In the case of the mixed ice, the band is broadened through interactions with PHP. The integrated CO band area is, nevertheless, the same for both ices, representing a CO column density of ∼19 × 10−15 cm−2 as detailed in Table 1.

The difference spectra represent the irradiations for which QMS data are shown in Figs. 2 and C.1. They are obtained by subtracting the IR spectra before irradiation (or wait) from those obtained after. The difference spectra have been baseline corrected by subtracting the mean value in the displayed range, excluding the shaded region around the CO band, and are offset for clarity. For the CO/PHP layered ice, the difference spectrum in Fig. 4b obtained after a wait time of 1 min without irradiation shows a positive feature indicating a continuous CO deposition during the measurements. This deposition resulted from a higher background level of CO in the chamber during the measurements for the layered ice. The difference spectrum for the wait was obtained immediately before that corresponding to irradiation of PHP, for the same time period, and we therefore assume a similar amount of deposition occurred during the irradiation, where the FEL is only active for 0.003% of the irradiation time and so should not significantly affect the deposition. The difference spectra for the irradiation of the layered ice therefore represent a combination of irradiation-induced changes and this continued deposition. This is evident in the difference spectrum for irradiation of the CO band for the layered ice which strongly resembles that associated with a wait time of 1 min without irradiation, despite being obtained 30 min later. This is consistent with the QMS data in Fig. 2 that shows this irradiation resulted in no CO desorption. From Fig. 4b, the deposition appears to be of a similar magnitude as the desorption for the PHP irradiation, which could affect the desorption by continuously supplying new weakly bound CO molecules in the irradiation spot. It should be noted, however, that only a fraction of the deposition observed here for the full RAIRS spot takes place within the much smaller FEL spot and so we do not expect the deposition to affect the desorption process. This is discussed further in the following.

For both ices, the excitation of the PHP mode (3.42 µm) results in CO desorption as revealed by the presence of negative CO stretching band features in the difference spectra in Fig. 4. This desorption signature is significantly stronger for the layered ice, consistent with the CO desorption signals measured by the QMS data for the same irradiations shown in Fig. 2. Although the QMS data showed a small CO desorption signal for excitation of the CO mode for the mixed ice, no clear desorption feature can be seen in the IR difference spectrum. This is consistent with an inefficient desorption process.

We note that the IR difference spectra showed small decreases in the intensity of PHP bands following irradiations that caused CO desorption. However, it is unclear if this indicates PHP desorption, as the spectral changes were too weak to be characterised and could feasibly also result from changes in environment following CO desorption. No PHP desorption was detected with the QMS when tuned to its corresponding mass-to-charge ratio (m/z = 218). The QMS has a lower sensitivity for heavy species, likely making the detection of a small amount of desorbing PHP challenging.

thumbnail Fig. 4

RAIR spectra (top) and difference spectra (bottom) for irradiation of the (a) CO:PHP mixed ice and (b) CO/PHP layered ice, focusing on the region around the CO stretching mode. The CO peak shape is different for the mixed and layered ices but represents the same total area and CO column density. The difference spectra represent the irradiations for which QMS data are shown in Figs. 2 and C.1, with the band irradiated denoted above each spectrum. The difference spectrum for a wait time of 1 min without irradiation for the layered ice (grey) indicates continuous CO deposition. Each difference spectrum has been baseline corrected by subtracting the mean value in the displayed range, excluding the shaded region around the CO band, and has been offset for clarity, represented by horizontal lines. The off-resonance irradiation energy was Eirr = 56 mJ.

3.4 CO desorption efficiency

In the following, we quantify the amount of CO desorbed during irradiation, utilising the data analysis procedures developed in our previous work for the CO-H2O layered ice system (Slumstrup et al. 2025). The RAIR difference spectra in Fig. 4 are integrated within the CO peak range represented by the shaded areas. This range is 2145 –2130 cm−1 for the mixed ice and 2147 – 2132 cm−1 for the layered ice to account for the differences in peak shape for the two systems. The change in column density, ∆N, can be found as ΔN=ln10ΔAbs(v˜)dv˜Aband ×4.5SRAIRSSFEL.$\Delta N = - \ln 10{{\mathop \smallint \nolimits^ \Delta Abs(\tilde v){\rm{d}}\tilde v} \over {{A_{{\rm{band}}}} \times 4.5}}{{{S_{{\rm{RAIRS}}}}} \over {{S_{{\rm{FEL}}}}}}.$(4)

This relation is equivalent to Eq. (2) with ∆Absv˜${\tilde v}$ corresponding to the IR band in the difference spectrum. The additional term, S RAIRS/S FEL, accounts for the RAIRS and FEL beams having different spot sizes on the substrate, resulting in only a few percent of the ice probed by RAIRS being exposed to the FEL beam. The IR difference spectrum therefore averages any changes as if they had occurred over the entire RAIRS spot. This can be corrected by scaling the amount of CO desorbed by the ratio of the RAIRS spot size to that of the FEL, which we refer to as the dilution factor. For the 3.42 µm PHP irradiations, the dilution factor is 120, while for 4.67 µm CO irradiations it is 64. The difference arises due to the wavelength-dependent size of the FEL beam. More details are given in Appendix A.

Based on this analysis, we estimate that ∆N = (5 ± 2)× 1015 molecules cm−2 and (16 ± 2)× 1015 molecules cm−2 ± CO desorbed following the PHP irradiations of the mixed and layered ice, respectively. For the layered ice, the value has been corrected for the increase in column density during the wait, assuming the deposition continues at a similar rate throughout the irradiations. Considering the dilution factor, the amount of CO deposited within the FEL spot corresponds to only 0.003% of the amount of CO desorbed; thus, we can assume that the continuous deposition does not affect the desorption process. The off-resonance irradiation of the mixed ice resulted in no CO desorption; however, integrating the associated RAIR difference spectrum yields a non-zero value of ∆N = 2 × 1015 molecules cm−2 most likely resulting from the poor signal-to-noise ratio. Thus, we can take this value as a measure of the noise variation and use it as the uncertainty for the observed CO desorption amounts. Small uncertainties in the RAIRS and FEL beam sizes can be accounted for by this conservative error estimate. For example, considering a variation in the RAIRS spot height of 0.5 mm would result in all of the experimental desorption amounts falling within twice the uncertainty. We are confident that this error estimate also accounts for other small sources of uncertainty; for instance, the FEL-2 irradiation energy varying ∼5% during irradiations and IR band strengths variations for pure CO versus CO in contact with PHP, both of which are difficult to quantify independently.

When this uncertainty is taken into account and, after correcting with expected CO deposition for the layered ice, only excitation of the PHP mode leads to a decrease in NCO. Interestingly, for the layered ice, the desorbed column density corresponds to 86% of the available CO, indicating that almost all the CO molecules within the irradiation spot desorbed during the irradiation. Conversely, for the mixed ice, only 24% of the CO desorbed, with much of the remaining CO molecules likely trapped within the matrix of PHP molecules. In this case, the continuous slow desorption observed in the QMS signal might result from CO molecules slowly diffusing out from within the PHP film.

The total amount of CO desorbed from the layered ice is three times larger than for the mixed ice. This is consistent with the integrated desorption signal for the QMS data. The QMS data also revealed that the desorption for the layered ice occurred over a significantly shorter time. The efficiency of the photodesorption process, taking the different photon fluences into account, can be described in terms of a yield, Ydes,inc, in CO molecules per incident photon, determined according to Ydes,inc=ΔNCOϕt,${Y_{{\rm{des}},{\rm{inc}}}} = {{\Delta {N_{{\rm{CO}}}}} \over {\phi t}},$(5) where ϕ is the photon flux and t is the effective irradiation time. As can be seen from Fig. 2, the desorption processes did not continue significantly for the full 1 min irradiation period. The time constants obtained from the bi-exponential fits in Fig. 3 indicate that the slow desorption process reaches 5% of its initial amplitude after 13 s for the mixed ice and 3 s for the layered ice. We took these to be the effective irradiation times from which to derive the incident fluence. Alternatively, the desorption yield can be considered with respect to the absorbed photon fluence, Ydes,abs, also referred to as the quantum yield, determined through Ydes,abs=Ydes,incχ,${Y_{{\rm{des}},{\rm{abs}}}} = {{{Y_{{\rm{des}},{\rm{inc}}}}} \over \chi },$(6) where χ = 1 − 10−Abs is the fraction of the incident photons that are absorbed by the ice. This can be determined from the experimental absorbance, Abs, at the relevant wavelength and spot on the sample using the Beer–Lambert law. We note that this should be considered an estimate given the difference between using the unpolarised RAIRS beam with an incidence angle of 80 and the p-polarised light FEL beam with an incidence angle of 45. We did not take the spectral width of the FEL beam into account because the full FEL beam width is always contained within the extent of the PHP CH stretching band. Table 3 summarises the resulting desorption amounts and yields for irradiation of the PHP band for both ices investigated, along with the effective irradiation time used to obtain the yields. The obtained yields indicate that it is an order of magnitude more efficient to desorb CO from the layered than the mixed ice through excitation of the PHP mode.

The quantum yields reported here can be compared to similar values derived from the desorption cross-sections in Table 2, although only for the slow process since reliable cross-sections could not be obtained for the fast process. These are determined using photon absorption cross-sections found from the experimental absorbance similar to χ. The resulting values are (0.3 ± 0.1) × 10−4 molecules per absorbed photon for the mixed ice and (1.04 ± 0.08) × 10−4 molecules per absorbed photon for the layered ice. For the mixed ice, the correspondence with the quantum yield obtained from the RAIRS data confirms that, in this case, the slow process governs the majority of the desorption process. For the layered ice, the obtained quantum yield is around a third of the RAIRS derived value, reflecting the dominance of the fast process for this system.

The desorption yields listed in Table 3 can be considered averages over the irradiation times. For the first-order desorption processes we observe in the studied ices, the desorption rate at any given time appears to depend on the amount of CO available on the surface. As CO desorbs, the desorption rate will therefore decrease. Further measurements are necessary to determine whether this also applies to other ice thicknesses. Under interstellar conditions, the timescale for the desorption process would be much longer, with continual replenishment of desorbed CO maintaining a higher desorption rate and resulting in a higher overall yield.

Table 3

Desorption amounts and yields for the PHP irradiations of the mixed and layered ices.

4 Discussion

4.1 Excitation of the CO mode

Our results clearly indicate that IR excitation of the strong CO stretching mode at 4.67 µm is not an efficient pathway by which CO can desorb from interstellar icy grains. No desorption at all was observed for the layered ice where CO was deposited as a thin film on top of PHP. This system can be considered analogous to pure CO on top of a hydrogenated carbonaceous grain. When the two species are mixed, a negligible amount of CO desorption is evident, indicating that the irradiation does excite the CO molecules. Similarly, we demonstrated in our previous work that excitation of CO for a pure CO ice and CO on top of ASW leads to no or inefficient desorption of CO (Slumstrup et al. 2025). In that work, we discussed how theoretical studies of CO support a low desorption efficiency (Hemert et al. 2015; Ferrari et al. 2024).

The inefficient desorption observed following excitation of the CO stretching mode indicates that there must be some other non-desorptive energy dissipation pathway. Some relaxation could occur through coupling to the underlying substrate, although it is unclear whether this could be efficient for layers far away from the interface, especially considering that this would need to occur through the PHP layer. Alternatively, we suggest that the absorbed energy could be re-emitted through IR emission, as we also discussed for the CO and CO on ASW systems (Slumstrup et al. 2025). While this could not be measured at the LISA set-up in its current configuration, Chen et al. (2019) demonstrated such a mechanism for a monolayer of CO adsorbed on a crystalline NaCl surface. They found that IR excitation of the CO led to vibrational energy pooling and subsequent IR emission from excited states. It is unclear to what extent such a relaxation mechanism would also occur for the CO in our mixed and layered ices with PHP, although subsequent studies by DeVine et al. (2022) revealed that energy pooling and IR emission also occur for thick (∼300 layers) CO ices on NaCl. Re-emission may serve as a mechanism for dissipating energy from the ice systems following CO mode excitation. DeVine et al. (2022) showed that impurities in the CO ice could disrupt this process. In our experiments, PHP could act as such an impurity, opening up a pathway to CO desorption. We note that the small amount of CO desorption we observe for this ice could feasibly also arise from multiphoton effects. While this is unlikely under our experimental conditions, they cannot be completely ruled out, as discussed in Appendix D. Further investigations are necessary to verify the nature of the energy dissipation mechanism for vibrationally excited CO molecules in ices such as those studied in this work.

4.2 Excitation of the PHP mode

Compared to excitation of the CO stretching mode, our results show that vibrational excitation of PHP molecules deposited beneath or embedded within the CO ice leads to significant CO desorption at wavelengths where CO itself is transparent. The desorption yields in Table 3 reveal that the resulting desorption is about an order of magnitude more efficient for the layered than for the mixed ice. For the layered ice, 86% of the available CO molecules desorb, while for the mixed ice only 24% des-orb, with much of the remaining CO likely trapped within the PHP film. The gradual diffusion of these trapped CO molecules out from the PHP could contribute to the slower desorption process observed for the mixed ice. Given the efficiency of the CO desorption for the layered ice with about 18 layers of CO, our results indicate that for a CO molecule to desorb, it does not need to be in direct contact with an excited PHP molecule. Rather, energy transfer must occur through the CO film to the vacuum interface, from where surface-bound CO molecules can desorb. It is noteworthy that this occurs despite the direct CO excitation not causing significant desorption. Collective effects due to PHP molecules being in contact with each other could also be responsible for the increased desorption efficiency in the case of the layered ice. As discussed in Appendix D, we estimate that up to a third of the PHP molecules could be excited in each FEL micropulse, making it more likely for neighbouring PHP molecules to be excited simultaneously. Such effects would be much less likely in the mixed ice, where PHP molecules are dispersed. It should be noted that the desorption yields reported in Table 3 are, in general, applicable only to the specific ice systems and thicknesses probed in these experiments. For example, a thicker PHP film would absorb more energy from the FEL, which could lead to a higher CO desorption rate, while a thicker CO film could either promote or hinder desorption, depending on the underlying desorption mechanism. Further investigations are required to probe the dependence of the desorption efficiency on parameters such as layer thickness, concentration, and irradiation energies. We note that under interstellar conditions, other processes such as UV excitation and the continuous replenishing of the ice from the gas phase will also occur simultaneously. Nevertheless, we consider that our reported desorption yields provide a reasonable order of magnitude estimate for desorption from CO-PHP systems.

The CO desorption efficiencies for the two CO-PHP systems studied can be compared to those we reported previously for the CO on ASW system (Slumstrup et al. 2025). For this layered ice, between 1.7 × 10−4 and 10.5 × 10−4 CO molecules desorbed per photon absorbed by the underlying ASW, with the yield increasing with photon energy. While the CO desorption efficiency for the mixed CO:PHP ice of 0.3 × 10−4 CO molecules per absorbed photon is an order of magnitude lower, the efficiency for the CO/PHP layered ice of 3.1 × 10−4 CO molecules per absorbed photon is within the range of that obtained with ASW. The similarity in CO desorption efficiency for the two layered systems suggests that similar underlying mechanisms might contribute to the energy transfer to the CO ice, leading to CO desorption, despite the very different underlying molecules. Further investigations are required to fully determine the nature of these mechanisms.

For the CO on ASW system in Slumstrup et al. (2025), a linear dependence between CO desorption and energy absorbed in the ASW indicates that the desorption is a single-photon process. As possible desorption mechanisms, we suggested excitation of the CO-H2O intermolecular vibrations, local heating, and restructuring of the porous ASW, leading to a loss of strong CO binding sites. The porous ASW in the layered ice was observed to restructure similarly to pure porous ASW upon IR excitation, attributed to local reorganisation towards a more ordered structure (Noble et al. 2020a; Cuppen et al. 2022). For the CO-PHP systems in the present study, restructuring is less likely to cause significant loss of binding sites, as the IR spectrum in Fig. 4b reveals the PHP layer to be non-porous. As discussed, there are also no significant spectral changes to the PHP bands indicating restructuring. During all irradiations, we observed a small temperature increase of ∼0.1 K, as measured by the Si-diode attached to the sample plate. We note that this does not directly reflect an actual temperature rise in the ice film under the laser spot; nevertheless, this indicates some heating of the ice. The temperature increase was approximately the same for all irradiation wavelengths, both on- and off-resonance, indicating that it likely represents energy input resulting from a small absorption by the Au substrate. This could not be responsible for the CO desorption in this work as it is seen only for on-resonance irradiations. For the CO-ASW system, temperature increases of up to 0.4 K were seen when exciting the strongest H2O bands so some localised heating could be occurring. In the case of the CO-ASW system, there are overlapping vibrational modes, representing a possible pathway for energy transfer between the two species. It is clear from the spectrum in Fig. 1 that there is no such overlap for the CO-PHP systems in the mid-IR region. However, we speculate that phonon modes at longer wavelengths could provide a means for similar energy transfer. Phonon-mediated long-range energy transfer could explain how CO desorption occurs for the 18 layers of CO, upon excitation of the underlying PHP. The QMS data suggest the presence of two desorption channels with different cross-sections, indicating that multiple mechanisms contribute to the observed CO desorption. Theoretical investigations of energy transfer in such systems will provide valuable insight into their underlying mechanisms.

This work, along with our previous study of the CO on ASW system (Slumstrup et al. 2025), shows that efficient energy transfer and indirect CO desorption can take place for several ice systems. IR-induced desorption has also been shown to occur for H2O (Noble et al. 2020a; Krasnopoler & George 1998; Focsa et al. 2003; Slumstrup et al. 2025), for CO from CO-ASW mixed ices upon excitation of H2O vibrational modes (Ingman et al. 2023), and for CO from CO-CH3OH (methanol) mixed ices upon excitation of CH3OH vibrational modes (Santos et al. 2023). These findings indicate that IR-induced non-thermal desorption processes could play a key role in determining the balance between the gas and condensed phases of the ISM.

5 Astrophysical implications

Our results confirm that direct vibrational excitation of the stretching mode of CO does not efficiently lead to CO desorption, indicating the presence of another energy dissipation pathway for excited CO molecules in ices. The possibility for dissipation to occur through IR emission warrants further investigation to determine its impact on energy dissipation in vibrationally excited astrophysical ices. Understanding the effect of impurities in the ice on these processes is also important when considering astrophysically relevant ices, particularly when their presence might open up additional photodesorption pathways, as indicated by this study.

Our measurements indicate that IR photon absorption by PHP drives efficient CO desorption. Given the structural similarities between PHP and the broader class of interstellar carbonaceous materials, including PAHs, HPAHs, and hydrogenated carbonaceous grains, we suggest that they could lead to similar desorption processes. These materials are abundant in interstellar clouds and possess a range of strong IR bands. Recent observations of a range of cyano-PAHs in similar abundance in the dense cloud TMC-1 (Wenzel et al. 2025a) suggest that IR excitation of PAHs and related species, regardless of size or structure, could contribute in a similar way to desorbing CO and potentially other small volatiles from icy grains. Carbonaceous species could, therefore, provide new energy input pathways to the ices where volatile species themselves are transparent or do not desorb due to non-desorptive relaxation processes, such as the IR emission observed in the case of CO. Such desorption processes provide a crucial link between condensed and gas-phase interstellar chemistry. In the mixed ice, PHP acts as an analogue of (H)PAHs embedded in CO ices with the relevance of such a system supported by the model for PAH freeze-out in dense clouds by Bouwman et al. (2011a). In the layered ice, the PHP acts, instead, as an analogue of hydrogenated carbonaceous grains, thought to be abundant in the ISM (Jones 2016; Sandford et al. 1991; Pendleton et al. 1994; Chiar et al. 2000, 2021). This system should be considered as a general example of grain-induced desorption of volatile species. H2O ice is expected to form first on the interstellar grains, but we note that the potential of bare grain surfaces being exposed to CO ice is supported by studies suggesting that H2O could be mobile and cluster on the grain surfaces in dense clouds (Rosu-finsen et al. 2016). In addition, it has been argued that interstellar grains could be very porous and would thus have low effective ice coverage (Potapov et al. 2020).

It is necessary to consider the different photon fluxes present within interstellar clouds to relate our experimental results to astrophysical environments. The IR photon flux at low extinctions (AV ∼ 3 mag), when CO has begun to form a nonpolar ice layer on the grains, has been estimated to be on the order of 1010 photons cm−2 s−1, across the 1 – 10 µm range (Boogert et al. 2015; Mathis et al. 1983). At higher extinctions, deeper within the clouds (AV ∼ 50 mag), where catastrophic freeze-out of CO has occurred and icy mantles are enriched with more complex molecules, the corresponding IR fluxes are on the order of 108 photons cm−2 s−1. Under our experimental conditions, typical photon fluences are on the order of 1022 photons cm−2, meaning that the derived photodesorption yields correspond to an interstellar desorption timescale of 104–106 years, depending on cloud density. This is within typical molecular cloud lifetimes, meaning that the experimental photon fluences are not unreasonable compared to those expected to impinge on an interstellar icy grain. This indicates that the non-thermal desorption mechanisms discussed could play a significant role in gas-grain interactions.

Another relevant comparison is between the relative importance of IR and UV radiation in driving desorption. Several experimental studies have shown that UV radiation can also drive photodesorption of CO. For pure CO ice, UV and VUV photodesorption yields were found using broadband sources (Öberg et al. 2009; Paardekooper et al. 2016) to be ∼1 × 10−3 CO molecules per incident photon or using monochromatic VUV synchrotron radiation to be up to 5 × 10−2 CO molecules per incident photon for wavelengths corresponding to electronic transitions to the A1Π state (Fayolle et al. 2011). These are three to four orders of magnitudes higher than those obtained in the present work for IR excitations of the PHP mode. The flux of IR photons inside dense clouds is, however, much higher than for UV. The integrated UV photon flux has been estimated to be on the order of 104 photons cm−2 s−1 inside interstellar clouds (Cecchi-Pestellini & Aiello 1992; Shen et al. 2004) for extinctions higher than AV ∼ 3 mag, namely, several orders of magnitude lower than the IR flux across the full wavelength range. Hence, under dense cloud conditions, where IR photons dominate, such IR-induced processes could play a significantly larger role in photodesorption inside dense clouds. We note that the quantitative extrapolations of our results to interstellar conditions are tentative, since we cannot fully rule out cumulative effects from excitations of neighbouring PHP molecules. This is an effect that is unlikely to occur with the significantly lower photon fluxes in the ISM.

6 Conclusions

This work demonstrates that (i) direct vibrational excitation of CO does not efficiently drive CO desorption, while (ii) vibrational excitation of C–H stretching modes in PHP leads to significant indirect photodesorption of CO. We therefore suggest that exposure of carbonaceous materials containing C–H bonds in dense clouds to IR radiation could play a significant role in the desorption of volatile species from the grains. Further studies are required to understand the energy transfer and desorption mechanisms, along with the question of which ice constituents, thicknesses, and volatile species it occurs for. With the abundance of (H)PAHs, hydrogenated grains, and IR irradiation in dense clouds and icy mantles, along with the need to understand the existence of observed volatile species in the gas phase, we stress the importance of investigating and including these desorption processes in astrochemical modelling.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Danish National Research Foundation through the Center of Excellence “InterCat” (Grant agreement no.: DNRF150). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 654148 – LASERLAB-EUROPE. The main components of the experimental apparatus LISA used in this work were purchased using funding obtained from the Royal Society through grants UF130409, RGF/EA/180306, and URF/R/191018. The authors thank the FELIX Laboratory team for their experimental assistance and support.

References

  1. Basalgète, R., Ocaña, A. J., Féraud, G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 213 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein, M. P., Sandford, S. A., Allamandola, L. J., et al. 1999, Science, 283, 1135 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein, M. P., Moore, M. H., Elsila, J. E., et al. 2003, ApJ, 582, L25 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertin, M., Fayolle, E. C., Romanzin, C., et al. 2012, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 14, 9929 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertin, M., Romanzin, C., Doronin, M., et al. 2016, ApJ, 817, L12 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2015, Annu. Rev. A&A, 53, 541 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouilloud, M., Fray, N., Cottin, H., Gazeau, M., & Jolly, A. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2145 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouwman, J., Cuppen, H. M., Steglich, M., Allamandola, L. J., & Linnartz, H. 2011a, A&A, 529, A46 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouwman, J., Mattioda, A. L., Linnartz, H., & Allamandola, L. J. 2011b, A&A, 525, A93 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cazaux, S., Boschman, L., Rougeau, N., et al. 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 19835 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cecchi-Pestellini, C., & Aiello, S. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cernicharo, J., Marcelino, N., Roueff, E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, L43 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, L., Lau, J. A., Schwarzer, D., Verma, V. B., & Wodtke, A. M. 2019, Science, 363, 158 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiar, J. E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Whittet, D. C. B., et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, 749 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiar, J. E., de Barros, A. L. F., Mattioda, A. L., & Ricca, A. 2021, ApJ, 908, 239 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cook, A. M., Ricca, A., Mattioda, A. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 14 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Coussan, S., Roubin, P., & Noble, J. A. 2015, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 9429 [Google Scholar]
  18. Coussan, S., Noble, J. A., Cuppen, H. M., Redlich, B., & Ioppolo, S. 2022, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 2262 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cuppen, H. M., Noble, J. A., Coussan, S., Redlich, B., & Ioppolo, S. 2022, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 8859 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cuylle, S. H., Allamandola, L. J., & Linnartz, H. 2014, A&A, 562, A22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. DeVine, J. A., Choudhury, A., Lau, J. A., Schwarzer, D., & Wodtke, A. M. 2022, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 2270 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dupuy, R., Bertin, M., Féraud, G., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A61 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Evans, L., Booth, A. S., Walsh, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 62 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fayolle, E. C., Bertin, M., Romanzin, C., Michaut, X., & Oberg, K. I. 2011, ApJ, 739, 1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fedoseev, G., Chuang, K. J., Ioppolo, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 52 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ferrari, B. C., Hemert, M. V., Meyer, J., & Lamberts, T. 2024, J. Phys. Chem. C, 128, 21060 [Google Scholar]
  27. Focsa, C., Chazallon, B., & Destombes, J. L. 2003, Surf. Sci., 528, 189 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fuchs, G. W., Cuppen, H. M., Ioppolo, S., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 629 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gudipati, M. S., & Yang, R. 2012, ApJ, 756, L24 [Google Scholar]
  30. Guzmán, V. V., Goicoechea, J. R., Pety, J., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A73 [Google Scholar]
  31. Habart, E., Boulanger, F., Verstraete, L., et al. 2003, A&A, 397, 623 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hardegree-Ullman, E. E., Gudipati, M. S., Boogert, A. C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 172 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hemert, M. C. V., Takahashi, J., & Dishoeck, E. F. V. 2015, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 6354 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ingman, E. R., Laurinavicius, D., Zhang, J., et al. 2023, Faraday Discuss., 245, 446 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ioppolo, S., Fedoseev, G., Chuang, K. J., et al. 2021, Nat. Astron., 5, 197 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ioppolo, S., Noble, J. A., Traspas Muiña, A., et al. 2022, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 385, 111601 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jensen, P. A., Leccese, M., Simonsen, F. D. S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 5492 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Joblin, C., & Tielens, A. 2011, EAS Publ. Ser., 46, eds. C. Joblin, & A. G. G. M. Tielens Jones, A. P. 2016, R. Soc. Open Sci., 3, 160224 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kouchi, A., Tsuge, M., Hama, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 1530 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Krasnopoler, A., & George, S. M. 1998, J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 788 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mathis, J. S., Mezger, P. G., & Panagia, N. 1983, A&A, 128, 212 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  42. Meinert, C., Myrgorodska, I., de Marcellus, P., et al. 2016, Science, 352, 208 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mennella, V., Hornekær, L., Thrower, J., & Accolla, M. 2012, ApJ, 745, L2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Muñoz Caro, G., Meierhenrich, U., Schutte, W., et al. 2002, Nature, 416, 403 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Naraoka, H., Takano, Y., Dworkin, J. P., et al. 2023, Science, 379, eabn9033 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Noble, J. A., Martin, C., Fraser, H. J., Roubin, P., & Coussan, S. 2014a, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 20488 [Google Scholar]
  47. Noble, J. A., Martin, C., Fraser, H. J., Roubin, P., & Coussan, S. 2014b, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5, 826 [Google Scholar]
  48. Noble, J. A., Cuppen, H. M., Coussan, S., Redlich, B., & Ioppolo, S. 2020a, J. Phys. Chem. C, 124, 20864 [Google Scholar]
  49. Noble, J. A., Michoulier, E., Aupetit, C., & Mascetti, J. 2020b, A&A, 644, A22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nuevo, M., Milam, S. N., Sandford, S. A., et al. 2011, Adv. Sp. Res., 48, 1126 [Google Scholar]
  51. Öberg, K. I. 2016, Chem. Rev., 116, 9631 [Google Scholar]
  52. Öberg, K. I., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Linnartz, H. 2009, A&A, 496, 281 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. Öberg, K. I., Furuya, K., Loomis, R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 112 [Google Scholar]
  54. Paardekooper, D. M., Fedoseev, G., Riedo, A., & Linnartz, H. 2016, A&A, 596, A72 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pedretti, A., Mazzolari, A., Gervasoni, S., Fumagalli, L., & Vistoli, G. 2021, Bioinformatics, 37, 1174 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pendleton, Y. J., Sandford, S. A., Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Sellgren, K. 1994, ApJ, 437, 683 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Perotti, G., Rocha, W. R., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2020, A&A, 643 [Google Scholar]
  58. Piétu, V., Dutrey, A., & Guilloteau, S. 2007, A&A, 467, 163 [Google Scholar]
  59. Porter, T. A., & Strong, A. W. 2005, in 29th Int. Cosm. Ray Conf. [Google Scholar]
  60. Potapov, A., Jäger, C., & Henning, T. 2020, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 221103 [Google Scholar]
  61. Rauls, E., & Hornekær, L. 2008, ApJ, 679, 531 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rosu-finsen, A., Marchione, D., Salter, T. L., et al. 2016, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 31930 [Google Scholar]
  63. Roueff, E., Ruaud, M., Le Petit, F., Godard, B., & Le Bourlot, J. 2013, Proc. Int. Astron. Union, 9, 311 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sandford, S. A., Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 1991, ApJ, 371, 607 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sandford, S. A., Bernstein, M. P., & Materese, C. K. 2013, ApJS, 205, 8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Santos, J. C., Chuang, K.-J., Schrauwen, J. G. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 112, 1 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schrauwen, J. G. M., Cuppen, H. M., Ioppolo, S., & Redlich, B. 2024, A&A, 691, A209 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  68. Sephton, M. A. 2002, Nat. Prod. Rep., 19, 292 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Shen, C. J., Greenberg, J. M., Schutte, W. A., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A&A, 415, 203 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sloan, G. C., Bregman, J. D., Geballe, T. R., et al. 1997, ApJ, 474, 735 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Slumstrup, L., Thrower, J. D., Schrauwen, J. G. M., et al. 2025, ACS Earth Sp. Chem., 9, 1607 [Google Scholar]
  72. Steglich, M., Huisken, F., Friedrich, M., & Plass, W. 2013, ApJS, 208, 26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Thrower, J. D., Jørgensen, B., Friis, E. E., et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tielens, A. 2008, Annu. Rev. A&A, 46, 289 [Google Scholar]
  75. Vastel, C., Ceccarelli, C., Lefloch, B., & Bachiller, R. 2014, ApJ, 795, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wenzel, G., Cooke, I. R., Changala, P. B., et al. 2024, Science, 386, 810 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wenzel, G., Gong, S., Xue, C., et al. 2025a, ApJ, 984, L36 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wenzel, G., Speak, T. H., Changala, P. B., et al. 2025b, Nat. Astron., 9, 262 [Google Scholar]
  79. Willacy, K., & Langer, W. D. 2000, ApJ, 544, 903 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zeichner, S. S., Aponte, J. C., Bhattacharjee, S., et al. 2023, Science, 382, 1411 [Google Scholar]

1

National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 75524, Perhydropyrene. Retrieved May 1, 2025 from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/ Perhydropyrene

Appendix A Spot size and overlap of RAIRS and FEL beams

The spot sizes of the RAIRS and FEL beams incident on the substrate are both important factors for the analysis in this work. The FEL spot size, SFEL, determines the incident photon flux and also enters into the calculation of the desorbed CO column density, ∆NCO. This calculation also requires the RAIRS spot size, SRAIRS, through the ratio S RAIRS/SFEL, which is referred to as the dilution factor. The details of the calculated spot sizes can be found in Slumstrup et al. (2025). For the RAIRS aperture of 1 mm used in this work, a spot height of dIR = 0.45 cm was determined, resulting in S RAIRS = 0.92 cm2. The FEL spot size is wavelength-dependent. For the irradiations in this work, FEL spot heights, areas, and dilution factors are reported in Table A.1.

Table A.1

FEL spot heights, areas, and dilution factors for the irradiations in this work.

Appendix B PHP column and layer density

To the best of our knowledge, there are no published IR band strengths for PHP. We therefore make an estimate by comparing IR and QMS measurements between PHP and pyrene for a series of temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) measurements at the LISA set-up, as band strengths for pyrene exist in the literature. We assume the QMS to have similar sensitivity to pyrene (m/z = 202) and PHP (m/z = 218), so to a first approximation, equivalent pyrene and PHP signals in the QMS correspond to the same number of molecules. However, as we are only measuring the parent mass in both cases, we need to take the different fragmentation patterns into account. We therefore measured the fragmentation pattern of both molecules in the LISA QMS by dosing each molecule directly into the QMS and measuring all masses in the range m/z = 100–220. We determined that for pyrene, 40.2% is detected as the parent m/z = 202, while for PHP, 17.5% is detected as the parent m/z = 218. By dividing the detected QMS signals for a parent mass by this detection efficiency, the QMS detection is corrected for the difference in detection for pyrene and PHP. For three TPDs of PHP-containing ices, the integrated QMS desorption signal for m/z = 218 was related to the signal for m/z = 202 in an equivalent TPD of a pyrene-containing ice, after correcting for the QMS detection difference for each. This factor then represents the difference in pyrene/PHP amounts between measurements. The absolute pyrene amounts were estimated with Eq. (2), as an average of the 714 cm−1 and 851 cm−1 pyrene bands. We used band strengths for pyrene in H2O (Hardegree-Ullman et al. 2014) with A714 = 14.073 × 10−18 cm/molecule and A851 = 19.125 × 10−18 cm/molecule, respectively. Using the factor from the QMS comparison, the absolute PHP amount for each measurement was then estimated. This absolute amount was related to the integrated absorbance of the combined aliphatic CH stretching modes for PHP at 3.42 µm to finally obtain an estimated band strength, through Eq. (2), of ACH = 1.53 × 10−16 cm/molecule.

The PHP molecule has a cross-sectional area of 3.79 × 10−15 cm2, based on an estimate made in the molecular mod elling suite VEGA ZZ (Pedretti et al. 2021) using the published molecular geometry for PHP1, resulting in a layer density for PHP molecules of 0.26 × 1015 cm−2. Dividing the column density of PHP by this layer density yields the approximate number of PHP layers in the ice.

Appendix C Individual CO desorption peaks

Figure C.1 shows the CO desorption signals in the QMS for all irradiations considered, focusing only on the desorption peaks corresponding to the first three FEL macropulses. Along with the CO desorption signals shown for PHP and CO irradiations in Fig. 2, the off-resonance irradiation of the mixed ice is also included, confirming that no CO desorption occurs. In this figure, the data for the PHP irradiation of the layered ice has not been scaled as it was in Fig. 2.

thumbnail Fig. C.1

CO (m/z = 28) desorption detected in the QMS for the first few FEL macropulses during all irradiations in this work. The connecting lines are shown as a guide to the eye. All traces have been baselined to the average CO signal before irradiation starts and offset for clarity. The zero-time is defined as the onset of the first peak for the irradiations showing desorption signal.

The temporal spacing of the desorption peaks reflects the 5 Hz macropulse repetition rate of the FEL while the acquisition bin size corresponds to the 10 ms QMS acquisition time. In addition, there is a short processing period on the order of a few 10ths of a ms associated with each measurement point during which the QMS is not acquiring, and hence we do not expect to detect the true shape and height of each peak. For the analysis and fits to the QMS signals in Fig. 3, each macropulse peak has been integrated to account for as much of the desorption as possible, in a range of 100 ms around the peak.

We note that the broadening of the desorption transient associated with each macropulse does not arise from the much shorter 6 µs width of the macropulse. Even a low kinetic temperature of Tk,CO = 25 K would result in a CO arrival time distribution at the QMS that would be contained within the 10 ms acquisition time. We attribute the broadening to the pump-down of CO in the UHV chamber following each desorption event.

Appendix D Estimate of absorbed photon density

The experimental photon fluxes in this work are orders of magnitudes higher than in the ISM. Therefore, before comparing the experiments to astrophysical conditions, it is important to consider if the experiments give rise to multiphoton processes which are unlikely to occur in the ISM.

We first consider the excitations of the PHP mode. Under the assumption of rapid intermolecular energy transfer, we can expect full relaxation of an excited PHP molecule between the individual few ps long micropulses that are spaced 1 ns apart. It is then necessary to consider the density of photons absorbed in each micropulse. The PHP irradiation for the layered system with irradiation energy of 61 mJ has the highest photon flux with 1.4 × 1020 photons cm−2 in each macropulse and thus 2.3 × 1016 photons cm−2 in each micropulse. With an estimated PHP column density of NPHP = 1.8 × 1015 molecules cm−2, there are ∼ 12.7 incident photons per PHP molecule. We estimate the fraction of incident photons absorbed by the ice as χ = 1 − 10−Abs, obtained from the experimental absorbance at the relevant wavelength. This should only be considered an estimate given the difference between the angle of incidence for the RAIRS experiments using unpolarised light (80) and the p-polarised FEL beam (45). We do not consider the width of the FEL beam in this estimate as the full beam width is covered by the PHP bands. Based on the experimental spectrum, a fraction of χ = 0.025 photons are absorbed in this case. Therefore, an estimated 0.32 photons are absorbed per PHP molecule in each micropulse in the PHP irradiation of the layered ice. For the mixed ice, an equivalent analysis gives 0.24 absorbed photons per PHP molecule. This estimate shows that up to one in every three PHP molecules could be excited in each micropulse. So for PHP irradiations, while multi-excitations of the same PHP molecule are unlikely, they cannot be ruled out, and multiphoton processes caused by interactions between neighbouring excited molecules can feasibly occur, especially for the layered case.

Next, we consider excitation of the CO mode. The CO irradiation for the mixed system with an irradiation energy of 38 mJ has the highest photon flux with 0.63 × 1020 photons cm−2 in each macropulse and thus 1.0 × 1016 photons cm−2 in each micropulse. With an estimated CO column density of NCO = 19.3 × 1015 molecules cm−2, there are ∼0.54 incident photons per CO molecule. As a result of the sharpness of the CO peak, the full width of the FEL beam does not lie within the CO band. We again determine the fraction of absorbed photons solely based on the absorbance at the irradiation wavelength, which is therefore an upper limit. Based on the experimental absorbance spectrum, χ = 0.13. Therefore, an upper limit of 0.07 photons are absorbed per CO molecule in each micropulse for this irradiation. For the layered ice, an equivalent analysis gives 0.10 absorbed photons per CO molecule. Ferrari et al. (2024) modelled vibrational excitations of CO and reported inefficient energy dissipation and long lifetimes for vibrationally excited CO, on the order of ∼1 ns. Based on this, it is feasible that an excited CO molecule could stay excited between micropulses, making multiphoton excitation events between subsequent micropulses possible. These considerations show that while multiphoton processes within a micropulse are less likely for CO with an upper limit of 10% CO molecules excited, we cannot rule out multiphoton effects between micropulses.

These simple estimates for photons per molecule assume an even distribution of energy across the irradiation area and use the total absorption for each ice to estimate average photon densities. We note that the photon density is higher in the centre of the irradiation spot, and that more of the photon absorption occurs in the upper layers of the ice. Nevertheless, the presented arguments support that multi-excitations of the same molecule within a micropulse are unlikely to play a significant role in the observed desorption for any of the irradiations in this work. However, we cannot rule out some multiphoton effects between neighbouring excited molecules or even between subsequent micropulses in the case of CO irradiations. Our results can therefore not be extrapolated directly to ISM conditions without further studies.

All Tables

Table 1

Overview of the experiments performed in this work with column densities, N, and irradiation wavelengths, λFEL, for each ice.

Table 2

CO desorption time constants, τ, and photodesorption cross-sections for the slow desorption process, σ2.

Table 3

Desorption amounts and yields for the PHP irradiations of the mixed and layered ices.

Table A.1

FEL spot heights, areas, and dilution factors for the irradiations in this work.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

(a) Structure of perhydropyrene (PHP, C16H26), the fully superhydrogenated version of pyrene. (b) RAIR spectrum of the CO:PHP mixed ice. The main spectral features are marked, and coloured arrows indicate the irradiation wavelengths: the strongest CH stretch of PHP at 3.42 µm (blue) and the CO stretching mode at 4.67 µm (red).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

CO desorption signals detected by the QMS for m/z = 28 during irradiations of the mixed CO:PHP and layered CO/PHP ices, baselined and offset for clarity. Irradiation energies, Eirr, are denoted above each spectrum. For better visual comparison, the desorption trace for the PHP mode irradiation of the layered ice with higher irradiation energy has been scaled by a factor of two-thirds. Each individual desorption peak corresponds to a 5 Hz macropulse of the FEL. The zero-time for irradiation is defined as the onset of the first CO desorption peak.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Bi-exponential fits to the integrated CO desorption signals derived from the data presented in Fig. 2, for the 3.42 µm irradiation of the mixed (top panel) and layered (bottom panel) CO-PHP systems. The data for the layered ice has not been scaled.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

RAIR spectra (top) and difference spectra (bottom) for irradiation of the (a) CO:PHP mixed ice and (b) CO/PHP layered ice, focusing on the region around the CO stretching mode. The CO peak shape is different for the mixed and layered ices but represents the same total area and CO column density. The difference spectra represent the irradiations for which QMS data are shown in Figs. 2 and C.1, with the band irradiated denoted above each spectrum. The difference spectrum for a wait time of 1 min without irradiation for the layered ice (grey) indicates continuous CO deposition. Each difference spectrum has been baseline corrected by subtracting the mean value in the displayed range, excluding the shaded region around the CO band, and has been offset for clarity, represented by horizontal lines. The off-resonance irradiation energy was Eirr = 56 mJ.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. C.1

CO (m/z = 28) desorption detected in the QMS for the first few FEL macropulses during all irradiations in this work. The connecting lines are shown as a guide to the eye. All traces have been baselined to the average CO signal before irradiation starts and offset for clarity. The zero-time is defined as the onset of the first peak for the irradiations showing desorption signal.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.