Table 3.
X-ray spectral analysis results.
| J0723 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instruments | Model | NH | NH, gal(a) | Dist.(b) | kT | R(c) | Γ(d) | ϵ(e) | σ | EW(f) | χν2(ν) | Absorbed flux(g) |
| [1020 cm−2] | [1020 cm−2] | [kpc] | [eV] | [km] | [eV] | [eV] | [eV] | [10−13 erg s−1 cm−2] | ||||
| EPIC-pn | BB | ![]() |
64.7 | < 1.4 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.02(16) | ![]() |
||||
| EPIC-pn | PL | ![]() |
64.7 | < 2.1 | ![]() |
4.20(16) | ![]() |
|||||
| All | BB | ![]() |
64.7 | < 1.4 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.04(41) | ![]() |
||||
| J0819 | ||||||||||||
| Instruments | Model | NH | NH, gal(a) | Dist.(b) | kT | R(c) | Γ(d) | ϵ(e) | σ | EW(f) | χν2(ν) | Absorbed flux(g) |
| [1020 cm−2] | [1020 cm−2] | [kpc] | [eV] | [km] | [eV] | [eV] | [eV] | [10−13 erg s−1 cm−2] | ||||
| EPIC-pn | BB | ![]() |
6.7 | < 0.3 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.92(20) | ![]() |
||||
| EPIC-pn | PL | ![]() |
6.7 | ![]() |
1.10(20) | ![]() |
||||||
| All | BB | ![]() |
6.7 | < 0.3 | ![]() |
![]() |
0.97(45) | ![]() |
||||
| J0840 | ||||||||||||
| Instruments | Model | NH | NH, gal(a) | Dist.(b) | kT | R(c) | Γ(d) | ϵ(e) | σ | EW(f) | χν2(ν) | Absorbed flux(g) |
| [1020 cm−2] | [1020 cm−2] | [kpc] | [eV] | [km] | [eV] | [eV] | [eV] | [10−13 erg s−1 cm−2] | ||||
| EPIC-pn | BB | ![]() |
5.71 | < 1.3 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.32(22) | ![]() |
||||
| EPIC-pn | PL | ![]() |
5.71 | ![]() |
3.96(22) | ![]() |
||||||
| EPIC-pn | BBGABS | ![]() |
5.71 | < 1.3★ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.89(19) | ![]() |
|
| All | BBGABS | < 1.1 | 5.71 | < 1.2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1.15(49) | ![]() |
|
| J1347 | ||||||||||||
| Instruments | Model | NH | NH, gal(a) | Dist.(b) | kT | R(c) | Γ(d) | ϵ(e) | σ | EW(f) | χν2(ν) | Absorbed flux(g) |
| [1020 cm−2] | [1020 cm−2] | [kpc] | [eV] | [km] | [eV] | [eV] | [eV] | [10−13 erg s−1 cm−2] | ||||
| EPIC-pn | BB | ![]() |
4.32 | < 1.3★ | ![]() |
![]() |
1.21(18) | ![]() |
||||
| EPIC-pn | PL | ![]() |
4.32 | ![]() |
3.83(18) | ![]() |
||||||
| EPIC-pn | BBGABS | ![]() |
4.32 | < 1.7 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
0.89(15) | ![]() |
|
| All | BBGABS | ![]() |
4.32 | < 1.1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1.08(50) | ![]() |
|
| J1445 | ||||||||||||
| Instruments | Model | NH | NH, gal(a) | Dist.(b) | kT | R(c) | Γ(d) | ϵ(e) | σ | EW(f) | χν2(ν) | Absorbed flux(g) |
| [1020 cm−2] | [1020 cm−2] | [kpc] | [eV] | [km] | [eV] | [eV] | [eV] | [10−13 erg s−1 cm−2] | ||||
| EPIC-pn | BB | ![]() |
5.77 | < 1.1★ | ![]() |
![]() |
0.99(36) | ![]() |
||||
| EPIC-pn | PL | ![]() |
5.77 | ![]() |
1.75(36) | ![]() |
||||||
| All | BB | ![]() |
5.77 | < 1.2 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.26(94) | ![]() |
||||
Notes. 1σ confidence intervals are provided for the best-fit parameters.
Galactic column density in the direction of the sources as inferred from HI4PI Collaboration (2016).
Upper distance limit based on the lower confidence level limit of the NH, E(B − V) value in the direction of the source equal to the 99% confidence region upper limit of the best-fit NH value. Distance values were inferred from the online tool described in Doroshenko (2024). Values marked with a star (★) indicate cases where the upper limit on NH is always above the lower confidence limit on NH, E(B − V) regardless of distance, indicating a possible extragalactic nature. Here, we give the distance according to the absolute NH, E(B − V) value.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.










































































