EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 703 (November 2025) A&A, 703 (2025) A105 References
Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 703, November 2025
Article Number A105
Number of page(s) 14
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555325
Published online 07 November 2025
  1. Abbey, T., Carpenter, J., Read, A., et al. 2003, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/332006/1157523/175772_afa_micrometeoroids.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. Aschenbach, B. 2002, in X-Ray Optics for Astronomy: Telescopes, Multilayers, Spectrometers, and Missions, 4496, SPIE, 8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhulla, Y., Misra, R., Yadav, J., & Jaaffrey, S. 2019, RAA, 19, 114 [Google Scholar]
  4. Conconi, P., & Campana, S. 2001, A&A, 372, 1088 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. de Chambure, D., Lainé, R., vanKatwijk, K., vanCasteren, J., & Glaude, P. 1997, ESA Bull., 89, 68 [Google Scholar]
  6. de Chambure, D., Lainé, R., Van Katwijk, K., & Kletzkine, P. 1999a, ESA Bull., 100, 30 [Google Scholar]
  7. de Chambure, D., Laine, R., van Katwijk, K., et al. 1999b, in Design and Engineering of Optical Systems II, 3737, SPIE, 396 [Google Scholar]
  8. ESA 2011, Spatial coordinate systems, https://xmm-tools.cosmos.esa.int/external/xmm_calibration/calib/documentation/CALHB/node7.html [Google Scholar]
  9. ESA. 2023, epicbscalgen, https://xmm-tools.cosmos.esa.int/external/sas/current/doc/epicbscalgen.pdf [Google Scholar]
  10. ESA. 2025, https://xmm-tools.cosmos.esa.int/external/sas/current/doc/ecoordconv.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. Freyberg, M. 2006, XMM-Newton XRT+EPIC straylight: overview, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/332006/1301262/mjf.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. Friedrich, P., & Freyberg, M. 2024, Investigations of the XMM-Newton X-ray baffle alignment, https://axro.cz/wp-content/uploads/conference_uploads/2024/contributions/posters/peter_friedrich_investigations_of_the_xmm-newt_2024.pdf [Google Scholar]
  13. Glatzel, H., Schmidt, M., Egle, W. J., et al. 1994, in Space Optics 1994: Space Instrumentation and Spacecraft Optics, 2210, SPIE, 360 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirsch, M. 2004, Improved Vignetting Corretion by refining the XMM optial axis., https://xmmweb.esac.esa.int/docs/documents/CAL-SRN-0156-1-3.pdf [Google Scholar]
  16. Marioni, F., Radaelli, P. G., Raggio, M. E., de Chambure, D., & Laine, R. 1999, in Optical Fabrication and Testing, 3739, SPIE, 232 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Koyama, K., et al. 1985, PASJ, 36, 741 [Google Scholar]
  18. Mori, H., & Friedrich, P. 2022, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (Springer), 1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Muñoz-Darias, T., Fender, R., Motta, S., & Belloni, T. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 3270 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pantaleoni, M., Kirsch, M., Martin, J., McDonald, A., & Tuttlebee, M. 2012, in SpaceOps 2010 Conference Delivering on the Dream Hosted by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and Organized by AIAA, 1980 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ponti, G., Morris, M., Terrier, R., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 172 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ponti, G., Hofmann, F., Churazov, E., et al. 2019, Nature, 567, 347 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schartel, N., González-Riestra, R., Kretschmar, P., et al. 2024, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (Springer), 1501 [Google Scholar]
  24. Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. 2015, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1409.1556] [Google Scholar]
  25. SOC, E. X.-N. 2024, “XMM-Newton Users Handbook”, issue 2.22 [Google Scholar]
  26. Spiga, D. 2011, A&A, 529, A18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Spiga, D. 2015, in Optics for EUV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Astronomy VII, 9603, SPIE, 107 [Google Scholar]
  28. Spiga, D. 2016, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 9905, SPIE, 1951 [Google Scholar]
  29. Spiga, D., Cotroneo, V., Basso, S., & Conconi, P. 2009, A&A, 505, 373 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stockman, Y., Barzin, P., Hansen, H., et al. 1999, in X-Ray Optics, Instruments, and Missions II, 3766, SPIE, 51 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stockman, Y., Barzin, P.,Domken, I., et al. 2001, in Fourth International Symposium Environmental Testing for Space Programmes, 467, 11 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stramaccioni, D., Faust, T., & Hinger, J. 2000, SAE Trans., 499 [Google Scholar]
  33. Strüder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tanaka, Y. 1997, in Accretion Disks—New Aspects: Proceedings of the EARA Workshop Held in Garching, Germany, 21–23 October 1996 (Springer), 1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Burovski, E., et al. 2021, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4406806 [Google Scholar]
  36. Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nat. Methods, 17, 261 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. 2016, The American Statistician, 70, 129 [Google Scholar]
  38. Watanabe, S. 2023, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:2304.11127] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wolter, H. 1952, Ann. Phys., 445, 94 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.