| Issue |
A&A
Volume 703, November 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A166 | |
| Number of page(s) | 21 | |
| Section | Catalogs and data | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554948 | |
| Published online | 13 November 2025 | |
A systematic search for orbital periods of polars with TESS
Methods, detection limits, and results
1
Institut für Astronomie und Astrophysik, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen,
Sand 1,
72076
Tübingen,
Germany
2
Leibniz Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP),
An der Sternwarte 16,
14482
Potsdam,
Germany
★ Corresponding author: hernandez@astro.uni-tuebingen.de
Received:
1
April
2025
Accepted:
21
September
2025
Context. Determining the orbital periods of cataclysmic variable stars (CVs) is essential for confirming candidates and for the understanding of their evolutionary state. The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) provides month-long photometric data across nearly the entire sky that can be used to search for periodic variability in such systems.
Aims. This study aims to identify and confirm the orbital periods for members of a recent compilation of magnetic CVs (known as polars) using TESS light curves. In addition to providing the periods, we set out to investigate their reliability, and hence the relevance of TESS for variability studies of CVs.
Methods. Four period-search methods were used, namely the Lomb-Scargle periodogram, the autocorrelation function (ACF), sine fitting, and Fourier power spectrum analysis, to detect periodic signals in TESS light curves. We investigated the correlation between noise level and TESS magnitude by ‘flattening’ the observed TESS light curves, effectively isolating the noise from the periodic modulation. To evaluate the reliability of the period detections, we developed a probabilistic framework for the detection success across signal-to-noise ratios in the power spectral density of observed light curves.
Results. Ninety-five of the 217 polars in our sample have pipeline-produced TESS two-minute cadence light curves available. The results from our period search are overall in good agreement with the previously reported values. Out of the 95 analysed systems, 85 exhibit periods consistent with the literature values. Among the remaining ten objects, four are asynchronous polars, where TESS light curves resolve the orbital period, the white dwarf’s spin period, and additional beat frequencies. For four systems, the periods detected from the TESS data differ from those previously reported. For two systems, a period detection was not possible due to the high noise levels in their light curves. Our analysis of the flattened TESS light curves reveals a positive correlation between noise levels – expressed as the standard deviation of the flattened light curve - and TESS magnitude. Our noise level estimates resemble the rmsCDPP, a measure of white noise provided with the TESS pipeline products. However, our values for the noise level are systematically higher than the rmsCDPP indicating red noise and high-frequency signals hidden in the flattened light curves. Additionally, we present a statistical methodology to assess the reliability of period detections in TESS light curves. We find that for TESS magnitudes ≳17, period detections become increasingly unreliable.
Conclusions. Our study shows that TESS data can be used to reliably and efficiently determine orbital periods in CVs. The developed methodology for period detection, noise characterisation, and reliability assessment can be systematically applied to other variable star studies, thus improving the robustness of period measurements in large photometric data sets.
Key words: methods: data analysis / methods: statistical / techniques: photometric / stars: magnetic field / novae, cataclysmic variables
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.