| Issue |
A&A
Volume 703, November 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A80 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Astrophysical processes | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555000 | |
| Published online | 06 November 2025 | |
Testing the effect of the progenitor metallicity on the 56Ni mass and constraining the progenitor scenarios in Type Ia supernovae
1
Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
2
Center for Galaxy Evolution Research, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
⋆ Corresponding author: ylkim83@yonsei.ac.kr
Received:
2
April
2025
Accepted:
6
September
2025
The analytical model found that the intrinsic variation in the initial metallicity of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor stars (Zprogenitor) translates into a 25% variation in the synthesized 56Ni mass, and therefore, into a difference of ∼0.2 mag in the observed peak luminosity of SNe Ia. Previous observational studies used the currently observed global gas-phase metallicity of host galaxies, instead of Zprogenitor that was used in the model, and the studies showed a higher scatter in the 56Ni mass measurements than the model prediction. We used Zprogenitor of 34 normal SNe Ia and employed recent SN Ia explosion models with various configurations to cover the observed 56Ni mass range. Unlike previous studies, which only used samples in the sub-solar range, our sample covers the Zprogenitor range (1/3 Z⊙ < Zprogenitor < 3 Z⊙), where most of the Zprogenitor effect occurs. Linear regression returns a slope of 0.02 ± 0.03, which trend is opposite to that of the analytical model, but at at low statistical significance level. A comparison of our sample with SN Ia explosion models on the Zprogenitor–56Ni mass diagram allowed us to constrain the progenitor scenarios. We also explored other chemical composition indicators, such as (Fe/H)progenitor and (α/Fe)progenitor. For (Fe/H)progenitor, our sample follows the trend predicted by the analytical models, but at a low significance level (0.4σ). Noticeably, (α/Fe)progenitor shows the opposite trend and a clear gap. When we split the sample at (α/Fe)progenitor = 0.35(α/Fe)⊙, we find a 3σ difference in the weighted means of the 56Ni mass. Lastly, the standardized luminosities of SNe Ia in different Zprogenitor groups differed by 0.14 ± 0.09 (1.6σ) mag. We highlight a holistic approach (from the progenitor star to the explosion with SN Ia and host galaxy observational data) to understanding the underlying physics of SNe Ia for a more accurate and precise cosmology.
Key words: methods: data analysis / stars: abundances / supernovae: general / galaxies: abundances / distance scale
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.