Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 703, November 2025
Article Number A84
Number of page(s) 9
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555508
Published online 07 November 2025

© The Authors 2025

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

1. Introduction

Galactic winds (GWs) have been associated with starburst events (Weedman et al. 1981; Chevalier & Clegg 1985). These powerful outflows are caused by the material ejected by the stars generated on set starburst; therefore, their mass flux rates and velocities are strongly correlated with the host galaxy’s SFR (Rubin et al. 2014). Furthermore, starburst galaxies are often called super wind galaxies due to the intensity of these outflows (Thompson & Heckman 2024) and these super winds significantly influence the galactic disk, halo, and intergalactic medium.

Within galaxies, starburst events are typically concentrated in collections of super stellar clusters (SSCs) with masses exceeding 10 M (Portegies Zwart et al. 2010), and compact at 2 − 3 pc (Ryon et al. 2017). These SSCs are predominantly located in the central regions of galaxies (Holtzman et al. 1992; Melo et al. 2005; Li et al. 2015), where they play a crucial role in driving galactic winds (Zhang 2018). SSCs have a large fraction of massive stars (M > 10 M), such as those observed in the M82 galaxy (Levy et al. 2024). These massive stars inject mass and energy into the interstellar medium (ISM) through stellar winds during their lives and through supernovae at the end of their lives. These flows coalesce into a single wind emanating from each SSC. The combined contribution of winds from multiple SSCs in the central region of the Galaxy ultimately drives the galactic wind (e.g. Veilleux et al. 2005). The formation and propagation of this wind also depend on the proprieties of the medium, such as the density and pressure profile of the host galaxy. These properties provide the appropriate structural conditions, such as a Laval nozzle, to channel and sustain the outflow (Rodríguez-González et al. 2008; Rubin et al. 2014).

The wind generated by SSCs plays a significant role in the loss of gas, metals, and energy from the galactic centre (Robles-Valdez et al. 2017) and in the enrichment of both the galactic medium (D’Ercole & Brighenti 1999; Mac Low & Ferrara 1999) and the intergalactic medium (Sanders et al. 2023). It has been shown in previous studies that galactic winds, driven by the SSCs winds, provide critical feedback on starburst activity within the galaxy via observations (e.g. Garnett 2002; Hirschauer et al. 2018; Zhang 2018; Krieger et al. 2021) and numerical simulations (Bertone et al. 2007; Rodríguez-González et al. 2008, 2009, 2011; Robles-Valdez et al. 2017). This feedback alters the chemical evolution of the galaxy and across longer timescales, it also affects star formation in the host galaxies (Bertone et al. 2007).

Observations show that SSCs are mainly distributed within the nuclear starburst region, which is the closest region of the galactic disk, as in the case of the archetypal starburst M82 (catalog built with HST observations (Mayya et al. 2008), and shown in other recent observations with JWST (Levy et al. 2024)). In some starburst galaxies and galaxies with active galactic nuclei (AGNs), a fraction of SSCs are observed in nuclear rings (Knapen 2005; Mazzuca et al. 2008). Examples include the galaxy NGC 253 (Levy et al. 2022) and the galaxy NGC 7552 (Brandl et al. 2012). NGC 253 is a starburst spiral galaxy located at a distance of 3.5 Mpc Rekola et al. (2005). It exhibits a distribution of SSCs within an elliptical (ring) starburst located in the galactic centre. The ellipse has a semi-major axis of ∼110 pc, a semi-minor axis of ∼60 pc, and the SSC inside the ellipse has an orbital period of period of ≈6 Myr (Levy et al. 2022) as well as an SFR of 2 M yr−1 (Leroy et al. 2015). The galactic wind in NGC253 is observed in Hα up to 2 kpc and in X-rays up to 9 kpc from the galactic plane (Strickland et al. 2002). The mass flux rate is estimated to be 2.8 M yr−1 for the northern outflow and 3.2 M yr−1 for the southern (Lopez et al. 2023), which corresponds to a 12.5% difference between the north-south flows.

Galactic winds exhibit complex dynamics with different velocities and fluxes at different galactic latitudes and altitudes. They also show an interstellar multi-phase structure, including very hot, hot, warm, cold, and relativistic (cosmic ray) phases, each characterised by different chemical states (Heckman & Thompson 2017; Thompson & Heckman 2024). Such properties have been observed in the starburst galaxy M82 (Zhang 2018; Krieger et al. 2021; Lopez et al. 2023). Recently, it was suggested that the transverse stratification of galactic winds, characterised by hot and cold components, could arise from the interaction of isotropic winds from central galactic superstar clusters with the galactic disk (Strickland & Stevens 2000; Strickland et al. 2002; Melo et al. 2005; Meliani et al. 2024). In this scenario, the wind gets shocked, and deflected by the galactic disk, then becomes denser, decreasing the temperature under the influence of radiative cooling. An alternative scenario proposes that the stratification results from the combined outflows of SSCs within a ring structure (Nguyen & Thompson 2022), where the winds are heated by terminal shocks formed when converging flows collide near the galactic axis; however, this study was performed on the basis of a uniform medium, which lacked any possible interaction of the wind with the galaxy disk.

This paper investigates how these two processes, the winds from SSCs within a ring structure and the interaction of the galactic wind with the galactic disk, contribute to the development of multi-phase and multi-dynamic galactic winds. In addition, we investigate the off-disk displacement of the ring and its asymmetry between the northern and southern regions. We aim to study how the wind can drag the disk material and how we can have a non-symmetric northern and southern flow such as the one observed in NGC 253 (Lopez et al. 2023).

NGC 253 galaxy was specifically chosen as a case study since it has a well-characterised ring-shaped starburst (RSS), as well as a multi-frequency observed wind; this is in part thanks to the galaxy inclination of 76° Sanders et al. (2003). Other galaxies also fulfil some of these characteristics, such as NGC 7552, which has a well-studied starburst ring (Brandl et al. 2012); however, the inclination of this galaxy prevents us from determining the presence of a wind. There is also the example of NGC 7771, whose starburst ring has been well characterised by Smith et al. (1999), although it does not show any evidence of an outflow in the galaxy.

This paper is structured as follows. Section 1 reviews previous studies of this type of event, focussing on the starburst galaxy NGC 253. In Section 2, we describe the factors we considered for our simulations, including the position and structure of the SSCs and the galaxy. Section 3 presents the results of our simulations and their analysis. Finally, in Section 4, we summarise the main results and conclusions of this work.

2. Numerical models

We performed axisymmetric hydrodynamical simulations in spherical coordinates, using axial boundary conditions; in particular, taking the axes perpendicular to the disk and passing through its centre. The wind (mass, momentum, and energy fluxes) are injected from a ring surrounding the galactic axis. The hydrodynamical simulations of galactic winds were performed using the MPI-AMRVAC code (Keppens et al. 2020), which solves the conservation equations considering an optically thin radiative cooling by including it as a source term in the energy equation (van Marle & Keppens 2011). The governing equations are given by

ρ t + · ( ρ v ) = 0 , $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \rho }{\partial t} + \boldsymbol{\nabla } \cdot (\rho \boldsymbol{v}) = 0 , \end{aligned} $$(1)

ρ v t + · ( ρ v · v ) + ( p ) = 0 , $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \rho \boldsymbol{v}}{\partial t} + \boldsymbol{\nabla } \cdot \left(\rho \boldsymbol{v} \cdot \boldsymbol{v} \right) + \nabla \left(p \right) = 0, \end{aligned} $$(2)

e t + · [ ( e + p ) v ] = ( ρ 1.4 m h ) 2 Λ ( T ) , $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial e}{\partial t} + \boldsymbol{\nabla } \cdot \left[\left(e + p \right) \boldsymbol{v} \right] = -\left(\frac{\rho }{1.4\,m_{h}}\right)^2 \Lambda (T), \end{aligned} $$(3)

where ρ is the mass density, v is the velocity, and p is the thermal pressure. The symbol mh denotes the mass of a hydrogen atom and Λ(T) is the cooling function from the study by Schure et al. (2009), calibrated for solar metallicity and dependent on the temperature t = 1.1mhp/(ρkB).

In our simulations, we imposed a temperature floor of 100 K to ensure numerical stability and to prevent excessively short cooling timescales that would otherwise require prohibitively small timesteps; this is particularly important since we are modelling large-scale flows up to kiloparsec (kpc) scales. This commonly adopted numerical strategy is fundamental in simulations where detailed molecular and dust cooling processes are not explicitly included. For the physical configurations, input parameters, and spatial resolution explored in this study, we find that the gas temperature in the wind–disc interaction region remains above approximately 400 K. Thus, the imposed temperature floor cannot be reached by any significant component of the flow and it does not affect the thermal structure or the emergence of a multi-phase configuration. We note that at lower temperatures (T ≲ 100 K), additional cooling mechanisms such as molecular and dust cooling may become relevant and could alter the dynamics of the interaction region (e.g. Chen & Oh 2024).

The total energy density, e, is given by

e = p / ( γ 1 ) + ρ v 2 / 2 , $$ \begin{aligned} e= p/(\gamma -1) + \rho v^2/2, \end{aligned} $$(4)

while γ = 5/3 is the constant polytropic index.

Naturally, there are some physical processes that have not been included in the current project. Gravitational forces are assumed to have a negligible influence on the overall wind dynamics, given the large spatial scales, the relatively short simulation timescales, and the high velocity of the injected wind. However, gravity could affect the evolution of slower, cold clouds that may form in the interaction region between the wind and the ambient medium. Cosmic rays, while known to contribute to the launching and amplification of galactic outflows (Sike et al. 2025), are not accounted for in this work. In the presence of a strong starburst, such as the one modelled here, current studies suggest that their impact remains subdominant (Romano et al. 2025). Magnetic fields have not been taken in to count either, although they have been shown to influence the expansion of the forward shock and enhance the resulting X-ray emission (Meliani et al. 2024); notably, this effect seems to be relevant for magnetic fields on the range of 102 − 104 G, which is two orders of magnitude higher than the one detected in NGC 253 (Beck et al. 1994). These additional processes could be relevant, however, they lie beyond the scope of this paper and will be considered in future work.

2.1. Interstellar medium structure

We constructed the galaxy medium structure, considering a turbulent warm disk and a hot halo, both in hydrodynamic equilibrium, following the approach used in Meliani et al. (2024) and the framework of Strickland & Stevens (2000). The galactic potential is represented by combining King’s distribution for the halo and the Miyamoto & Nagai (1975) model for the disk. In fact, the disk has a mass of 2 × 109 M, a mean density of n disk , 0 = 20 cm 3 $ n_{\mathrm{disk,0}} = 20\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3} $, and a temperature of Tdisk = 6.7 × 104 K. The halo is set with a mass of 6 × 109 M and a mean density of nhalo,0 = 0.2 cm−3, with a core radios of R = 350 pc and a mean temperature of Thalo = 6.9 × 106 K.

2.2. Starburst properties

The evolution of the wind from massive, spherical clusters and its interaction with the galactic medium has been studied from both analytical and semi-analytical perspectives (Chevalier & Clegg 1985; Cantó et al. 2000; Rodríguez-González et al. 2007). In our study, the galactic wind is assumed to be driven by a stellar population within a cluster that is eccentric to the galactic core. In this scenario, the galactic wind emerges from a ring surrounding the galactic axis (Fig. 2), with the wind direction perpendicular to the surface of the ring shape.

The stellar population synthesis within the cluster was modeled according to two scenarios of star formation: continuous and instantaneous. The wind mass flux (t) and mechanical luminosity Lw(t) generated by the stellar cluster were derived using Starburst99 (SB99), assuming a Salpeter initial mass function (Salpeter 1955) with a stellar population that has masses ranging from 1 to 100 M. The resulting mass flux and mechanical luminosity as functions of time for both star formation scenarios are shown in Fig. 1. The wind velocity is obtained as follows: v w 2 ( t ) = L w ( t ) 1 2 M ˙ ( t ) $ \mathit{v}_{\mathit{w}}^2(t) = \frac{L_{\mathit{w}}(t)}{\frac{1}{2} \dot{M}(t)} $. We also considered the total mass of the cluster such that the maximum mass flux is 1 M/yr, consistent with the SFR of the star-forming ring of NGC 253 (Leroy et al. 2015).

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Mass loss (left side) and mechanical luminosity (right side) for an instantaneous burst (blue) and a continuous one (orange) obtained with SB99.

2.3. Initial setup

To investigate the effect of star formation bursts with ring-like structures, we performed hydrodynamical simulations based on a nuclear starburst with a ring-shaped distribution. The ring has a cross-sectional diameter of Re = 200 pc and an inner radius of Ri = 32.4 pc. The nuclear starburst has a star formation rate of 2.5 M/yr, corresponding to a higher mechanical luminosity of 2.47 × 1041 erg/s.

Using the evolutionary mass flux and mechanical luminosity presented in Fig. 1, we carried out hydrodynamical simulations up to an evolutionary time of 10 Myr; however, we compared our models at 4 Myr since this is the maximum time at which none of them have abandoned the simulation box. Figure 2 shows the ring-like star formation region from a 2D axisymmetric simulation perspective.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Set up for a ring-like starburst on an axisymmetric simulation, with a radius of injection equal to the internal radius of the torus, Ri, and positioned at a distance from the symmetry axes equal to the external radius of the torus: Re minus Ri.

We have ran five numerical models, varying the vertical altitude of the starburst ring along the galactic axis. These models incorporate the evolution of mass flux and mechanical luminosity for both continuous and instantaneous star formation scenarios. Table 1 summarises the properties of the numerical models.

Table 1.

Specific proprieties for each model presented in the paper, indicating where the starburst position is measured on the positive vertical axis.

3. Results

We present the analysis of our models and the results, focussing on the impact of the starburst ring’s vertical position within the galactic disk. Our study examines the morphology, kinematics, and dynamics of the wind, its interaction with the galactic disk and halo, and the resulting emission. Additionally, we analysis of the mass flux at different altitudes in both the northern and southern hemispheres.

3.1. Starburst in equatorial plane

We first considered the case of a starburst ring with a continuous burst located in the equatorial plane (MCENc). Figure 3 (left) presents the density maps for the MCENc case, illustrating the main structures of the galactic bubble at t = 4 Myr. The forward shock at high altitude, referred to as the halo forward shock, exhibits an arc-shaped structure within a region extending in altitude over z = [4, 6] kpc, with a radial expansion of r ≈ 2.5 kpc. At lower altitudes (z = [0, 1.5] kpc), the disk material swept up by the wind escapes laterally, referred to as the disk forward shock, forming a dense shell that encloses the wind.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Simulation for a central and continuous starburst (MCENc) at t= 4 Myr; the left side shows density and the right side shows Hα (orange) and X-rays (blue) emissions.

We also computed the Hα and thermal soft X-ray emission maps, following the description in Appendix A. We note that we considered the total thermal soft X-ray emission and we did not pay special attention to the contribution of charge exchange emission, which has been pointed out as an important contribution to the X-ray emission (Zhang et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2020). To consider this kind of emission, we would have had to track different gas species on the wind (Smith et al. 2014), which would also allow us to generate synthetic lines of emission. This aspect will be addressed in future papers. However, according to Lopez et al. (2023), in the case of NGC 253, this would imply an increase in the magnitude of the X-ray emission of 42% in the central region of the galaxy and it decreases to 20% at 1 kpc away from it; therefore, at the scales of our simulation, the effect on the forward shock would be minimal.

Figure 3 (right) presents these maps, where the Hα emission is represented in purple-orange and the X-ray emission in blue bars. The X-ray emission originates from the hot, shocked, and deflected wind along the galactic axis within the conical structure. The case is similar in the central region of the simulation. We have two main gas sources of Hα emission: a) the first are the knot structures found in the centre of the wind, extending to 4 kpc in length and b) the second source can be found within a radius of 2 kpc, high-density clumps inside the secondary shock generate significant Hα emission. This emission arises from the fragmentation of the dense, shocked shell formed by the galactic disk surrounding the free wind region. These structures may correspond to the filaments observed in M 82 (Shopbell & Bland-Hawthorn 1998).

3.2. Off-equatorial plane starburst

To reproduce the north–south asymmetry observed in galactic bubbles such as in NGC 253 (Levy et al. 2022), we performed a series of simulations in which the starburst ring was placed at various altitudes relative to the galactic equatorial plane. Both continuous and instantaneous wind injection scenarios were considered. Figure 4 displays the gas mass density for model MOC100c at t = 2 Myr (top panel) and t = 4 Myr (bottom panel). In this model, the starburst ring is located 100 pc above the galactic equatorial plane, on the northern side.

thumbnail Fig. 4.

Gas density maps for the 0.1 kpc off-centre continuous model (MOC100c) going from a time of 2 Myr on the top to 4 Myr on the bottom.

This asymmetric configuration results in a differential evolution of the galactic bubble between the northern and southern hemispheres. On the northern side, the galactic wind expands more rapidly through the disk, being closer to the low-density surface of the galaxy-disk. Conversely, on the southern side, the wind must propagate through the dense midplane of the galactic disk, entraining a larger amount of galactic-disk material. Moreover, the interaction with this denser region generates stronger shocks, which enhance radiative cooling losses. These combined effects significantly decelerate the expansion of the southern bubble compared to its northern counterpart.

A comparison between model MCENc, where the starburst cluster is located in the galactic equatorial plane (Fig. 4), and model MOC100c, where the cluster is offset by 100 pc above the plane (Fig. 3), reveals morphological differences in the resulting galactic bubbles. On the northern side, the bubble in model MOC100c extends up to 1 kpc in height and is approximately 1 kpc wider than in model MCENc. Furthermore, the northern bubble in MOC100c exhibits a more laminar flow, with smoother structures and fewer dense filaments.

In contrast, on the southern side, the bubble in model MOC100c is significantly smaller, reaching only about 1 kpc in both height and width, and it remains confined within the galactic disk. In addition, it exhibits more prominent and denser filamentary structures, with a length greater than 1 kpc; this increment in length is due to the wind fracturing a larger part of the disk of the host galaxy. These substantial differences are induced by a vertical displacement of the starburst ring of only 100 pc.

The northern and southern flows have a multi-phase structure. In the centre, a hot, conical wind arises from the deflection of the galactic wind along the galactic axis. This central wind extends to the terminal shock, reaching 4 kpc on the northern side, but only 0.25 kpc on the southern side. It is surrounded by a cooler, free-flowing galactic wind, which terminates at 2 kpc in the north and again at 0.25 kpc in the south. This is surrounded by a conical, cold shell formed by the interaction of the shocked, deflected galactic wind with the dense galactic disk. This shell also extends to 2 kpc in the north and 0.25 kpc in the south. Filaments form mainly on the southern side, where the shocks are stronger. On the northern side, filaments develop at the lateral edges of the cold shell and persist due to the mass and momentum deposited by the galactic wind. These structures continue to emit in Hα (see Fig. 5). In addition, on the northern side, filaments also emerge in the outer cold, dense shell surrounding the free-wind region, as well as behind the terminal shock. In addition, high-density clumps appear near the centre at early times in this region, but quickly dissipate. These clumps are similar to the southern filaments, although they lack sufficient mass to grow to the same size as those seen in the MOC100c model.

thumbnail Fig. 5.

Hα and X-ray emission maps of the wind simulated for the off-centre continuous starburst model (MOC100c), shifted by 0.1 kpc, at t = 4 Myr.

The Hα and X-ray emission maps shown in the right panel of Fig. 5 show that the southern flow has consistent X-ray emission throughout the wind. In contrast, the X-ray emission in the northern flow is mainly due to the swept-up shocked gas by the forward shock, resulting from the interaction between the galactic wind with the galactic halo gas and the galactic wind deflected by the galactic disk.

It is important to note that the formation of filaments is driven by disk fragmentation, which would not occur without including radiative cooling in our simulations, as highlighted by Rodríguez-González et al. (2008). To demonstrate this effect, we performed an additional simulation of model MOC100c in which radiative cooling was switched off. The resulting radiative emission at t = 4 Myr for the simulations with and without cooling is shown in Fig. 6 (left and right panels, respectively). In the absence of cooling, the galactic bubble expands more uniformly and develops significantly fewer filamentary structures.

thumbnail Fig. 6.

Hα and X-ray emissions of the wind simulated for a 0.1 kpc off-centre continuous starburst (MOC100c) at t = 4 Myr. Left: Case with cooling. Right: Adiabatic evolution.

We also performed a third simulation with model MOC10c, in which the starburst ring is shifted slightly to the north, by only 10 pc above the galactic plane. In this case (see Fig. 7), the asymmetry between the northern and southern sides is less pronounced than in model MOC100c. The main difference lies in the forward shock propagating into the galactic halo: on the southern side, it appears slightly flatter and extends only to about 5 kpc, compared to 6 kpc on the northern side.

thumbnail Fig. 7.

Hα and X-ray emissions of the wind simulated for a 0.01 kpc off-centre continuous starburst (MOC10c) at t = 4 Myr.

Figure 8 shows the radial position of the halo forward shock on the northern and southern sides for models MOC10c and MOC100c, considering the distance from the centre of the galaxy to the highest point of the shock and measuring only from the moment that it breaks out of the disk. In model MOC10c, up to t = 0.6 Myr, both the northern and southern bubbles grow symmetrically within the galactic disk. They begin to break out around t = 1.4 Myr, with only a slight difference in timing. During this breakout phase, the amount of galactic gas swept up by the wind in the southern-side is slightly greater than on the northern side. Additionally, the bubble extends laterally by about 0.1 kpc in the south, which further increases the swept-up mass in that direction. This enhanced mass loading slows down the propagation of the forward shock on the southern side. This result demonstrates that even a small vertical displacement of the starburst region can produce a significative asymmetry in the resulting galactic wind. This asymmetry might not be immediately apparent when considering only its size at a single point in time, but it becomes evident along the time evolution.

thumbnail Fig. 8.

Radius of the halo forward shock generated by the flow in both the north and south sides of the wind in the MOC10C and MOC100c models against time, considering the distance from the centre of the galaxy to the highest point of the shock.

The multi-phase structure of the galactic wind bubble, both for the model with the starburst cluster in the equatorial plane and for the model with the starburst cluster shifted to the north, is illustrated in the temperature maps shown in Fig. 9. The free wind region, with a temperature of the order of 104 K, extends conically outwards from the starburst ring. It surrounds the inner shocked wind, which converges towards the galactic axis and is deflected into a warmer flow with temperatures around 107 K. This temperature gradually decreases with height as the thermal energy is converted into kinetic energy.

thumbnail Fig. 9.

Temperature map for the models MCENc (left side) and the MOC100c (right side), both at a time of 4 Myr.

At the outer edge of the free-wind region, the wind deflected by the galactic disk forms a dense, hot, thin shell with temperatures also around 107 K. This shell maintains its high temperature up to a height of ∼2 kpc. This is due to the lateral compression by the dense galactic disk and the internal pressure of the galactic wind. Despite strong radiative losses, the continuous injection of momentum from the galactic wind maintains the high temperature of the shell. This dense shell is responsible for significant X-ray emission and has filamentary structures. In the model with the displaced starburst ring, this shell extends further upwards on the northern side and appears more filamentary and fragmented on the southern side.

In all the models discussed above, we have considered continuous starburst injection. However, we also performed a simulation with an instantaneous starburst, offset by 0.1 kpc from the galactic centre (model MOC100i). As shown in Fig. 10, this model produces a galactic bubble that develops only on the northern-side of the galaxy, this behavior persists even at the maximum time of the simulation (10 Myr). Moreover, even in the northern side, the galactic bubble remains small, with high-density regions appearing only in the gas swept up by the main shock. This is because even though we are injecting more energy during the first 1.3 Myr of the simulation, this leads to an increase in the ram pressure, causing the bubble to evolve more slowly than in the continuous models.

thumbnail Fig. 10.

Hα and X-ray emissions of the wind simulated for a 0.1 kpc off-centre instantaneous starburst (MOC100i) at t = 4 Myr.

In Fig. 11, we present maps of the emission for the two most prominent lines present in the range of temperatures of the X-ray previously presented emission maps: Fe XVII 1.5 nm and Ne X 1.02 nm. These lines were obtained using the emission coefficients of Sanders & Fabian (2011) and the abundances for a solar metallicity of Grevesse & Anders (1989). We can appreciate a more prominent emission of Ne X in the free wind zone, while Fe XVII is mainly better at tracing the halo forward shocks.

thumbnail Fig. 11.

X-ray emissions for the Fe XVII line in the MCENc model (left side) and the Ne X line for the MOC100c model (right side), both at a time of 4 Myr.

3.3. Mass and metallicity loss

To compare the mass fluxes of our models with those reported in Lopez et al. (2023), we computed the mass flux in the northern and southern lobes of each model, using the same areas of analysis used in that paper (Fig. 12). For the northern hemisphere, we took an area of 1.72 kpc by 430 pc at a height of 340 pc from the centre of the galaxy’s disk. For the southern hemisphere, we took an area of 1.72 kpc by 950 pc at a height of -340 pc.

thumbnail Fig. 12.

Mass analysis grid used to measure mass flux, analogous to the one used in Lopez et al. (2023).

Figure 13 displays the time evolution of the mass flux, showing several local maxima and significant differences between the northern and southern components.

thumbnail Fig. 13.

Upper image: Mass flux against time for the northern (continuous line) and southern (dotted line) regions for the models with continuous starburst injection. Lower image: Zoom on the upper image, presenting the northern regions only.

Starting with the model where the starburst ring is located at the galactic plane, we observed a symmetrical behavior between the two lobes, differing primarily in magnitude. This is expected, as the wind flux is intrinsically similar, and the variation arises due to differences in the analysis area. The mass flux reaches a peak around 2 Myr, with values of approximately 60 M/yr in the southern lobe and 17 M/yr in the northern one. After this peak, the dragged mass decreases, with the northern flux stabilising around 2 M/yr. Multiple local maxima are evident, likely caused by the passage of dense structures formed within the wind.

In the off-plane models, the northern lobe behaves more like a free wind, reaching a maximum mass flux of about 13.5 M/yr. For example, in the 10 pc offset model, this peak occurs at approximately 2 Myr. Afterward, the mass flux declines toward a stable value. In contrast, the southern lobes show no mass flux at the beginning of the simulation. The flux begins around 1 Myr for the 10 pc model, 1.3 Myr for the 50 pc model, and 2.1 Myr for the 100 pc model. Following the onset, the southern mass flux increases rapidly, reaches a global maximum, and then declines, also tending toward a free-wind regime.

It is important to note that although the global maximal can reach values as high as 97 M/yr, these high mass-loss rates are short-lived, lasting on a timescale of the order of 0.5 Myr. This short time window is small relative to the overall lifetime of a starburst, which may limit the observational likelihood of detecting such extreme outflows, depending on the evolutionary phase.

These results have a difference of up to an order of magnitude with respect to the measured values of Lopez et al. (2023), 2.8 M yr−1 for the northern outflow and 3.2 M yr−1 for the southern one. This is due in part to the knots of the central density. However, the majority of the mass causing the disparity of the south flow comes from the filaments; also, it is important to note that given the way that we performed the integration (i.e. just as a rotation of the axisymmetric simulation), each of the filaments was considered as a continuous surface instead of the multiple thin filaments that we would generate with a 3D simulation, which could raise considerably the mass flux. However, we should also consider that the difference of an order of magnitude only lasts for a short period of time. We can get a better match with the observations if we consider that the wind on NGC 253 would be outside the maximum ejection peak; for instance, as an earlier south side ejection or a late type where the northern flow is already in a free wind state and the southern one has passed its maximum (but not yet reaching the status of a stable free-wind). For our models, we find that the best fit is the model MOC100c at 2.3 Myr, the mass flux values vary by 0.5 M/yr from those reported as the closest to the observations.

4. Conclusions

We carried out hydrodynamic simulations for winds generated by starburst, considering a RSS and a host galaxy conforming to a disk and a halo structure. Our numerical models considered the evolution of the starburst first as an instantaneous and then as a continuous one. We also took into account the altitude position of the starburst ring. We did not consider galaxy rotation, dust dynamics, the effect of gravity, or magnetic fields. Our results show that the galactic wind from a ring with continuous star formation presents a more complex structure than previously described models considering a spherical burst. This structure, particularly the well-defined cone of interjection on the wind, break through the disk, generating a north and south side, even when starting of-centre. The interaction of the winds and the disk of the galaxies produce filamentary and dense structures with Hα emission, with lengths exceeding one or two kpc, comparable to observed structures of around 2 kpc Shopbell & Bland-Hawthorn (1998).

The non-nuclear star formation burst off-centre creates a significant difference in length, morphology, and mass flow between the northern and southern outflows. The interaction of the galactic wind with the dense filamentary structures induces internal shocks within the wind region, resulting in thermal X-ray emissions distributed throughout the wind, rather than remaining confined to the shocks.

In the context of a ‘thick disk’ and a vertical displacement of less than 100 pc, our models indicate that the mass flow between the northern and southern outflows can reach a difference of an order of magnitude. When we consider the evolution of the mass flux over time, there are windows of time around these maximal points where the observed mass flux (Lopez et al. 2023) can be replicated; for our models, we found the best result when considering a 100 pc distance from the centre and an age of 2.3 Myr. However, further studies on the mass dragged in the central overdensity are needed.

We plan to perform complementary tridimensional simulations that will help us to clarify the behaviour of the filaments in the wind, as well as the presence of the central overdensity, enabling us to perform a more refined study of the mass flux.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support of the UNAM-PAPIIT grants IN110722 and AG101125. J.A.O.-C. acknowledges scholarship from SECIHTI-México. A.R.G. is grateful to DGAPA-UNAM for the grants during an academic stay in LUTH, Observatoire de Paris, and is also grateful to LUTH, Observatoire de Paris for their hospitality.

References

  1. Beck, R., Carilli, C. L., Holdaway, M. A., & Klein, U. 1994, A&A, 292, 409 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertone, S., De Lucia, G., & Thomas, P. A. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1143 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brandl, B. R., Martín-Hernández, N. L., Schaerer, D., Rosenberg, M., & van der Werf, P. P. 2012, A&A, 543, A61 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cantó, J., Raga, A. C., & Rodríguez, L. F. 2000, ApJ, 536, 896 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Castellanos-Ramírez, A., Rodríguez-González, A., Esquivel, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2799 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Z., & Oh, S. P. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 4032 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chevalier, R. A., & Clegg, A. W. 1985, Nature, 317, 44 [Google Scholar]
  8. D’Ercole, A., & Brighenti, F. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 941 [Google Scholar]
  9. Garnett, D. R. 2002, ApJ, 581, 1019 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grevesse, N., & Anders, E. 1989, Am. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., 183, 1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Heckman, T. M., & Thompson, T. A. 2017, in Handbook of Supernovae, eds. A. W. Alsabti, & P. Murdin, 2431 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hirschauer, A. S., Salzer, J. J., Janowiecki, S., & Wegner, G. A. 2018, AJ, 155, 82 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holtzman, J. A., Faber, S. M., Shaya, E. J., et al. 1992, AJ, 103, 691 [Google Scholar]
  14. Keppens, R., Teunissen, J., Xia, C., & Porth, O. 2020, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:2004.03275] [Google Scholar]
  15. Knapen, J. H. 2005, A&A, 429, 141 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krieger, N., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: J/ApJ/897/176. [Google Scholar]
  17. Leroy, A. K., Bolatto, A. D., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Mayya, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, L55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, S., de Grijs, R., Anders, P., & Li, C. 2015, ApJS, 216, 6 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lopez, S., Lopez, L. A., Nguyen, D. D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 108 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mac Low, M.-M., & Ferrara, A. 1999, ApJ, 513, 142 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mayya, Y. D., Romano, R., Rodríguez-Merino, L. H., et al. 2008, ApJ, 679, 404 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mazzuca, L. M., Knapen, J. H., Veilleux, S., & Regan, M. W. 2008, ApJS, 174, 337 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Meliani, Z., Cristofari, P., Rodríguez-González, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A178 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. Melo, V. P., Muñoz-Tuñón, C., Maíz-Apellániz, J., & Tenorio-Tagle, G. 2005, ApJ, 632, 684 [Google Scholar]
  27. Miyamoto, M., & Nagai, R. 1975, PASJ, 27, 533 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nguyen, D. D., & Thompson, T. A. 2022, ApJ, 935, L24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W., & Gieles, M. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 431 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rekola, R., Richer, M. G., McCall, M. L., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 330 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Robles-Valdez, F., Rodríguez-González, A., Hernández-Martínez, L., & Esquivel, A. 2017, ApJ, 835, 136 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodríguez-González, A., Cantó, J., Esquivel, A., Raga, A. C., & Velázquez, P. F. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 1198 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodríguez-González, A., Esquivel, A., Velázquez, P. F., Raga, A. C., & Melo, V. 2008, ApJ, 689, 153 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodríguez-González, A., Raga, A. C., & Cantó, J. 2009, A&A, 501, 411 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rodríguez-González, A., Esquivel, A., Raga, A. C., & Colín, P. 2011, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis., 47, 113 [Google Scholar]
  36. Romano, L. E. C., Owen, E. R., & Nagamine, K. 2025, A&A, 701, L5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rubin, K. H. R., Prochaska, J. X., Koo, D. C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 156 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ryon, J. E., Gallagher, J. S., Smith, L. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 841, 92 [Google Scholar]
  39. Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sanders, J. S., & Fabian, A. C. 2011, MNRAS, 412, L35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanders, D. B., Mazzarella, J. M., Kim, D. C., Surace, J. A., & Soifer, B. T. 2003, AJ, 126, 1607 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Jones, T., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schure, K. M., Kosenko, D., Kaastra, J. S., Keppens, R., & Vink, J. 2009, A&A, 508, 751 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shopbell, P. L., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 1998, ApJ, 493, 129 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sike, B., Thomas, T., Ruszkowski, M., Pfrommer, C., & Weber, M. 2025, ApJ, 987, 204 [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith, D. A., Herter, T., Haynes, M. P., & Neff, S. G. 1999, ApJ, 510, 669 [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith, R. K., Foster, A. R., Edgar, R. J., & Brickhouse, N. S. 2014, ApJ, 787, 77 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Strickland, D. K., & Stevens, I. R. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 511 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Weaver, K. A., Hoopes, C. G., & Dahlem, M. 2002, ApJ, 568, 689 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thompson, T. A., & Heckman, T. M. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 529 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. van Marle, A. J., & Keppens, R. 2011, Comput. Fluids, 42, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 769 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Weedman, D. W., Feldman, F. R., Balzano, V. A., et al. 1981, ApJ, 248, 105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu, K., Li, K. J., Owen, E. R., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5621 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, D. 2018, Galaxies, 6, 114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, S., Wang, Q. D., Ji, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 61 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Appendix A: Emission

A.1. Soft X-ray emission

To calculate the X-ray emission for our models, we used the coefficients of CHANTI and the integration obtained in Castellanos-Ramírez et al. (2015), in the range of 0.3 to 10 keV, considering a solar metallicity. We fit a polynomial function for the coefficients.

thumbnail Fig. A.1.

Fit function for the X-ray emission coefficient (0.3 to 10 keV) compared with the CHANTI data.

A.2. Hα emission

For the Hα, we took the temperature and density of each cell of the simulation and calculated the collision and recombination coefficients as in Raga et al. (2015),

ϵ r ( H α ) = a T 0.568 + b T 1.5 , $$ \begin{aligned} \epsilon _r(\mathrm {H}\alpha ) = \frac{a}{T^{0.568}+b\;T^{1.5}} , \end{aligned} $$(A.1)

and

ϵ c ( H α ) = c T 0.5 e d / T × ( 1 + f 1 + g / T ) , $$ \begin{aligned} \epsilon _c (\mathrm {H}\alpha ) = \frac{c}{T^{0.5}}e^{-d/T}\times \left( 1+ \frac{f}{1+g/T} \right), \end{aligned} $$(A.2)

where a = 4×10−23, b = 3.85×10−5, c = 3.57 × 10−17, d = 140360, f = 7.8 y g = 5 × 105, and T is the electron temperature.

Then, the Hα coefficient is given by

j H α = 1 4 π [ χ H I I 2 n H 2 ( χ H I I ϵ r ( H α ) + ( 1 χ H I I ) ϵ c ( H α c ) ) ] , $$ \begin{aligned} j_{H\alpha }=\frac{1}{4 \pi } \left[\chi _{ \mathrm HII}^2 n_H^2\left(\chi _{ \mathrm HII}\; \epsilon _r(\mathrm{H}\alpha )+(1-\chi _{ \mathrm HII}) \, \epsilon _c (\mathrm{H}\alpha _c)\right)\right], \end{aligned} $$(A.3)

where χHII is the ionisation fraction, considering a coronal equilibrium given by

χ H I I = 1 1 + α ( T ) / c ( T ) $$ \begin{aligned} \chi _{ \mathrm HII}=\frac{1}{1+\alpha (T)/c(T)} \end{aligned} $$(A.4)

With α(T) = 3.6 × 10−10T−0.79 and c(T) = 5.83 × 10−11T0.5e157800/T.

All Tables

Table 1.

Specific proprieties for each model presented in the paper, indicating where the starburst position is measured on the positive vertical axis.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Mass loss (left side) and mechanical luminosity (right side) for an instantaneous burst (blue) and a continuous one (orange) obtained with SB99.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Set up for a ring-like starburst on an axisymmetric simulation, with a radius of injection equal to the internal radius of the torus, Ri, and positioned at a distance from the symmetry axes equal to the external radius of the torus: Re minus Ri.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Simulation for a central and continuous starburst (MCENc) at t= 4 Myr; the left side shows density and the right side shows Hα (orange) and X-rays (blue) emissions.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

Gas density maps for the 0.1 kpc off-centre continuous model (MOC100c) going from a time of 2 Myr on the top to 4 Myr on the bottom.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5.

Hα and X-ray emission maps of the wind simulated for the off-centre continuous starburst model (MOC100c), shifted by 0.1 kpc, at t = 4 Myr.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6.

Hα and X-ray emissions of the wind simulated for a 0.1 kpc off-centre continuous starburst (MOC100c) at t = 4 Myr. Left: Case with cooling. Right: Adiabatic evolution.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7.

Hα and X-ray emissions of the wind simulated for a 0.01 kpc off-centre continuous starburst (MOC10c) at t = 4 Myr.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8.

Radius of the halo forward shock generated by the flow in both the north and south sides of the wind in the MOC10C and MOC100c models against time, considering the distance from the centre of the galaxy to the highest point of the shock.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9.

Temperature map for the models MCENc (left side) and the MOC100c (right side), both at a time of 4 Myr.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10.

Hα and X-ray emissions of the wind simulated for a 0.1 kpc off-centre instantaneous starburst (MOC100i) at t = 4 Myr.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11.

X-ray emissions for the Fe XVII line in the MCENc model (left side) and the Ne X line for the MOC100c model (right side), both at a time of 4 Myr.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 12.

Mass analysis grid used to measure mass flux, analogous to the one used in Lopez et al. (2023).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 13.

Upper image: Mass flux against time for the northern (continuous line) and southern (dotted line) regions for the models with continuous starburst injection. Lower image: Zoom on the upper image, presenting the northern regions only.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.1.

Fit function for the X-ray emission coefficient (0.3 to 10 keV) compared with the CHANTI data.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.