Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 706, February 2026
Article Number A116
Number of page(s) 9
Section The Sun and the Heliosphere
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557526
Published online 04 February 2026

© The Authors 2026

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.

1. Introduction

Among the many events that take place in the Solar System, solar flares are among the most powerful in terms of energy release. These events are described as sudden energy releases that take place within active regions (see, for instance, Švestka 1976; Stix 2002; Fletcher et al. 2011, as general references). In a very short time, typically within a few minutes, solar flares are able to emit vast amounts of radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, ranging from long radio wavelengths to high-energy gamma rays. The sudden surge of energy that is released after the flare event is sometimes carried along magnetic loops to the lower solar atmosphere by accelerated particles, thermal conduction, or magnetohydrodynamic waves (e.g. Hirayama 1974; Aschwanden 2005). Moreover, part of the plasma can rise again, resulting in a plasma that can be observed with downward and upward-moving velocities as time passes (Neupert 1968; Fisher et al. 1985; Graham & Cauzzi 2015).

The amount of radiation depends on the flare phase, which can be roughly divided into two main phases: the impulsive and the gradual phases (for example, Švestka 1976). The former phase is the most active part of a flare, where high-energy radiation in the form of hard X-rays, gamma rays, microwaves, or white light is produced. These types of radiation point towards the fact that electrons and ions are accelerated to high speeds, where they can reach velocities of tens of ∼104 km s−1 (see Hudson & Ryan 1995; Zharkova et al. 2011; Reames 2013, for more information).

During the impulsive phase, we believe the particles carry the high energy with them towards the lower layers of the solar atmosphere. There, these particles interact with the solar plasma, heating it and making it glow brightly at different wavelengths (Fletcher et al. 2011). The locations where the mentioned high-energy particles interact with the solar surface are commonly referred to as the footpoints or ribbons of the solar flare. These footpoints mark the ends of the coronal magnetic loops, where most of the energy of the solar flare is transformed into radiation at the chromosphere and photosphere (e.g. Hirayama 1974). The gradual phase, on the other hand, is a gentler phase involving a slower but long-lasting release of energy that can be present for much longer, from minutes to even hours, and it is primarily observed as less energetic soft X-rays and ultraviolet emission. Recent observations of flare acceleration sites have employed combined imaging and spectroscopic diagnostics. For example, Li et al. (2024) used ASO-S (Li et al. 2019) and CHASE (Li et al. 2022) observations to examine white-light flare evolution. Chen et al. (2024) identified magnetic-bottle structures at loop-top regions where energetic electrons are accelerated. Spectroscopic studies by Joshi et al. (2025) revealed turbulent flows and non-Gaussian line profiles associated with filament reconnection during two-ribbon flares.

From previous studies, it seems that in order to better understand the mechanisms of energy transfer between the different atmospheric layers during a solar flare, specifically during its impulsive phase, we need to study the lower part of the solar atmosphere in detail. In particular, we need to infer the spatial and vertical distribution of the magnetic field vector as well as the thermodynamics of the different atmospheric layers. This is a task that is only attainable through observations of spectral lines sensitive to different layers of the solar atmosphere. This requirement leads to the need for multi-channel spectropolarimetry; in other words, the simultaneous observation of several spectral lines either in the same sensor or, in the best case, with multiple wavelength regions recorded at the same time inside one or multiple instruments. This approach will provide invaluable datasets for diagnosing the thermal and magnetic properties of the solar atmosphere and, for this reason, the next generation of ground-based solar telescopes, Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DIKST, Rimmele et al. 2020) and the European Solar Telescope (EST, Quintero Noda et al. 2022), have been designed and optimised since their early phases to perform these multi-channel spectropolarimetric observations.

In our case, we aim to make use of the Gregor Infrared Spectrograph (GRIS, Collados et al. 2012) installed at the Gregor telescope (Schmidt et al. 2012; Kleint et al. 2020) to analyse several of the spectral lines that fall in the spectral range centred at 10830 Å. In many simple slab–model calculations (optically thin), the ratio of the blue component (He I 10829.081 Å) to the red (blended) components (He I 10830.250 Å + 10830.341 Å) is often taken to be around 1 : 8 (around ±0.12) (Fisher 1964; Akimov et al. 2014; Vicente Arévalo et al. 2023). This ratio, along with other diagnostic spectral lines, such as the Si I 10827 Å transition, can provide valuable information on the thermodynamics of the solar chromosphere when affected by the flare activity (e.g. Sasso et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2012; Kuckein et al. 2015, 2025). Previous observations discovered that the intensity profiles of the He I triplet were enhanced up to emission levels (above the local continuum) due to the flare event (Petrie & Sudol 2010; Li et al. 2007; Sasso et al. 2011; Kuckein et al. 2015). This enhanced emission seems to be associated with the bombardment of non-thermal electrons that reach the chromosphere after the flare process has started (Nagai & Emslie 1984; Tei et al. 2018; Anan et al. 2018). At the same time, previous observations also show that the Si I line, mostly sensitive to physical parameters of the lower and middle photosphere, usually experiences less dramatic changes in its intensity profile, in terms of both its shape and the depth of the spectral line (Anan et al. 2018). This is in contrast with some works describing radiative-hydrodynamic flare models that predict that the Si I line core intensity can increase appreciably when the heating of the lower atmosphere is included in the simulation scheme (Ricchiazzi & Canfield 1983; Ding et al. 2005; Allred et al. 2015; Reep et al. 2016).

This study presents full Stokes observations of dynamic changes that occurred in both the photosphere and chromosphere of an active region during and after eruptive events associated with two C-class flares. It represents the first step of a series of investigations with which we aim to understand the physical mechanisms that trigger flares and how the solar atmosphere responds to such extraordinary phenomena. In this regard, we focus on analysing the spectral features of the spectral lines observed with GRIS, with a particular emphasis on studying the response of the He I 10830 Å triplet to the flaring phenomena and the impact of such phenomena in the lower atmosphere.

2. Observations and data preparation

On 16 July 2023, a C4.7 flare (FL1) and a C3.5 flare (FL2) were observed near the active region NOAA 13363 with the instruments Gregor Infrared Spectrograph (GRIS, Collados et al. 2012) and the improved High-resolution Fast Imager (HiFI+, Denker et al. 2023, 2018a,b) installed at the 1.5-metre Gregor solar telescope (Schmidt et al. 2012; Kleint et al. 2020). The active region was located at heliocentric-Cartesian coordinates (+728″, −372″), corresponding to a heliocentric angle of 55° (μ = 0.57).

Real-time image correction was provided by the Gregor Adaptive Optics System (GAOS, Berkefeld et al. 2012, 2010), which was operated effectively throughout the observing period under favourable conditions. Figure 1 shows the Fried-parameter r0, measured only when the AO system is locked1, during a two-hour observing window. The 20-minute time interval of the HiFI+ and GRIS observations is indicated by the light grey rectangle, which is characterised by the good seeing conditions (r0 = (6.75 ± 1.66) cm and r0,  max = 12.7 cm) and a low air mass (< 2). The air mass was obtained by using the web interface to the JPL Horizons system2.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Temporal evolution of the Fried-parameter r0 (black dots) and air mass (solid line) during the 16 July 2023 observations with the 1.5-metre Gregor solar telescope. The light grey rectangle corresponds to the time interval of the HiFI+ observations. The black dots were taken from the Gregor status monitor and the colour-coded dots are recorded in the headers of the GRIS scans. The colour-coded dots refer to the Fried-parameter r0 for each step during the five GRIS scans. The air mass was obtained by using the web interface to the JPL Horizons On−Line Ephemeris System.

2.1. Gregor Infrared Spectrograph

The slit orientation was perpendicular to the nearby solar limb (the slit scan orientation is shown in Fig. 2). Eight accumulations of four independent modulation states were acquired at each spatial step, with an exposure time of 100 ms per individual image. A total of five scans of 35 steps each were recorded with a cadence of about three minutes per scan. The step size and pixel size along the slit were both 0.135″, resulting in a field of view (FOV) of 59.4″ × 4.7″. The spectral sampling was 18 mÅ pixel−1. The observed spectral region encompassed the photospheric Ca I 10839 Å (deeper photosphere) and Si I 10827 Å (upper photosphere) lines, which are Zeeman triplets characterised by a Landé factor of geff = 1.5 (Balthasar et al. 2016). In addition, the spectral region included the He I triplet that provides information on the upper chromosphere.

The first three scans covered two consecutive flares. The first GRIS scan was obtained from 08:41:50 UT to 08:44:49 UT, corresponding to the post-flare phase of the flare FL1. The second scan was taken from 08:44:49 UT to 08:47:49 UT during the quiescent phase, i.e. the relatively quiet period of lower activity between the more intense flare events. The third scan was obtained from 08:47:49 UT to 08:50:48 UT, corresponding to the initial phase of the flare FL2. In addition, two more scans of the same area were taken from 08:51:41 UT to 08:57:41 UT. However, this work focuses only on the first three scans, which contain the mixture of the decaying phase from the first C-class flare and the impulsive phase of the second C-class flare.

The performed data processing includes photometric corrections, dark current subtraction, flat fielding, polarimetric calibration, and cross-talk removal according to the standard GRIS data reduction software, as was described by Collados (1999, 2003). This process reduces instrumental polarisation to values below about 10−3Ic. The Stokes profiles were then normalised to the local average continuum intensity calculated from quiet-Sun regions within the same FOV, carefully avoiding strong magnetic concentrations. For wavelength calibration, we relied on the telluric lines present in our observed spectral range, which serve as stable absolute references. The calibration procedure followed the standard GRIS data reduction pipeline corresponding to a velocity uncertainty lower than ∼0.5 km s−1. Additionally, we adjusted the continuum shape by fitting a polynomial to the ratio of the observed disc-centre gradient and that of the IAG solar atlas spectrum (Reiners et al. 2016), ensuring consistency with high-resolution solar reference data. It is noteworthy that small residual shifts, such as a slight blueshift observed in the Si I line, are consistent with typical convective blueshifts in the upper photosphere and the limits of wavelength calibration accuracy. The Cassda GUI3 software was used to remove the spikes in the spectral dimension of the Stokes parameters, using the interpolation method. Finally, the observations can be downloaded from the GRIS data archive, as per the open data policy4.

2.2. Improved High-resolution Fast Imager

High-cadence (about 12 s) and high-spatial-resolution (plate scale of 0.025″ pixel−1 and 0.05″ pixel−1) observations were obtained with HiFI+ in the Ca II H and TiO channels at 3968 Å and at 7058 Å, respectively. In HiFI+, the Ca II H filter has a FWHM of 10.8 Å, and the TiO filter has a FWHM of 9.46 Å. The filter characteristics are given in Table 1 and Fig. 9 of Denker et al. (2023). The Ca II H filter integrates over both the line core and line wings, leading to a significant contribution from the upper photosphere and lower chromosphere. The line-wing intensity is about half the continuum intensity at the points where the transmission of the filter is 50%. This mixing reduces the spectral purity of this chromospheric signal. However, small-scale magnetic fields and flare emission still produce a significant contribution to the integrated Ca II H intensity. The TiO bandhead has a strong response to magnetic fields that is absent in the field-free quiet Sun. Thus, it is commonly used for proxy magnetometry in the photosphere, where it benefits from better seeing conditions at longer wavelengths as compared to the Fraunhofer G band.

In total, 80 datasets captured the leading main spot and the flare from 08:41:53 UT to 08:57:49 UT. Each dataset initially consisted of 500 short-exposure (9 ms) images, of which the best 100 were selected for image restoration using the Kiepenheuer Institute Speckle Imaging Package (KISIP, Wöger & von der Lühe 2008). Data calibration and interfaces to image restoration methods are implemented in the sTools data processing pipeline (Kuckein et al. 2017). The restored images have a size of 1936 × 1216 pixels and 1536 × 1208 pixels, corresponding to a FOV of 48.2″ × 30.8″ and 76.5″ × 60.5″, respectively. HiFI+ data is available5.

2.3. SDO/AIA+HMI instruments

We also used magnetogram data from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI, Scherrer et al. 2012) and imaging data from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA, Lemen et al. 2012) instrument on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO, Pesnell et al. 2012) to trace the impact of the two C-class flares in plasma of higher temperature (see Fig. 2 a complementary six-channel SDO movie illustrating the evolution of the flares is provided as Movie 1). We overplot on the SDO images the co-aligned Gregor/GRIS slit-scan (red rectangle) and HiFI+ Ca II H and TiO FOVs (white and green boxes, respectively).

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Collection of SDO observations taken at around 08:48 UT. Co-aligned Gregor/GRIS slit-scan and HiFI+ FOVs are shown as red and green (TiO) as well as white (Ca II H) rectangles, respectively. The locations of the first flare (FL1) and second flare (FL2) are labelled in each panel. The bottom left image displays an HMI continuum image of the solar disc at the time of the observation, highlighting with a black square the location of the active region of interest. The lower right panel shows the temporal evolution of the X-ray flux recorded by GOES in the 1.0–8.0 Å (red) and 0.5–4.0 Å (blue) channels for the period from 08:30 UT – 09:10 UT on 16 July 2023. Gregor’s observations are indicated by the shaded blue region. The X-ray maxima are indicated by a solid green line for FL1 and a dotted blue line for FL2, corresponding to the flare peaks. The temporal evolution of the flares is shown in Movie 1 (available online).

We also include the temporal evolution of the X-ray flux in the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) channels (1.0–8.0 Å and 0.5–4.0 Å) in Fig. 2 (see Movie 1). The observation period of Gregor is marked by the shaded blue area, and the maximum intensities of the first flare (FL1) and second flare (FL2) are indicated by vertical solid green and dotted blue lines, respectively. The first spatial scan (08:41:50–08:44:49 UT) covered the post-flare phase of FL1, while the second flare (FL2) commenced at 08:46:00 UT, peaked around 08:51:00 UT, and ended at 08:56:00 UT. The third scan (08:47:49–08:50:48 UT) coincided with the rise and maximum phase of FL2. The set of images reveals that the Gregor observations were concentrated near the loop footpoints, where dynamic processes associated with the solar flares are typically more prominent.

3. Data analysis

After examining the time series of speckle-restored TiO images, we found that they do not show any flare-related intensity variations. Thus, we selected the snapshot with the best image quality to study the spatial distribution of intensity signals in the lower photosphere and plotted it in Fig. 3 (see Movie 2). We can see that the active region dominates the left side of the FOV, while an area of bright points appears on the right side of the sunspot (around the middle of the FOV). There are also additional small-scale active pores; for instance, at around position (720″,   − 362″). However, the occurrence of the flare activity happens further to the right side of the FOV (see labels FL1 and FL2), so it is not straightforward to connect the magnetic activity on the left side with the occurrence of the flares far to the right side.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Speckle-restored TiO image taken at 08:45:18 UT at the start of the second flare FL2. The white rectangle indicates the size and location of the speckle-restored Ca II H image shown in Fig. 4. The solid red rectangle shows the area covered by the Gregor/GRIS slit-scan. The associated animation is provided as Movie 2.

In the case of the spatial distribution of Ca II H chromospheric intensity signals, we have significant variations with time (see Fig. 4 and Movie 3, which is available online). The sunspot appears as a dark feature in comparison with its surroundings, except in the penumbra, where bright filaments can be detected. Close to it, towards the right side of the FOV, we have significant chromospheric activity correlated with the bright points detected in the photosphere. Further to the right, we can see the gradual appearance of the second C-class flare and how the GRIS scan captured part of it (see red rectangle).

thumbnail Fig. 4.

Time series of speckle-restored Ca II H images showing the temporal evolution of the second flare FL2 at a cadence of about 12 s (time interval − 24 s). The small white rectangle in the lower left corner has a size of 5″ × 1″. Gregor/GRIS slit scans are indicated by the solid red rectangle. The black arrow and the label ‘FL2’ indicate the identified location of the second flare. Note that the FOV of these HiFI+ Ca II H observations does not cover the location of FL1, which lies outside these panels. The corresponding time evolution is available in Movie 3.

To identify the spatial location of significant changes in the solar chromosphere, background-subtracted solar activity maps (BaSAMs) were computed using HiFI+ Ca II H images, as is shown in Fig. 5. BaSAMs condense the temporal variations of an entire sequence into a two-dimensional map. As is explained in Denker & Verma (2019), an average two-dimensional map is calculated from the whole time series. This average is then subtracted from each individual map, and the modulus of the resulting difference maps is used to compute a second average two-dimensional map, i.e. the final BaSAM. The first application of BaSAM presented in Verma et al. (2012) and Kamlah et al. (2023) demonstrated its use on high-resolution images, while its application to spectral data is outlined in Denker et al. (2023). The variation caused by small-scale Ca II H brightenings can be seen near the sunspot penumbra (see the encircled area on Fig. 5). The flare emission leaves a hazy appearance in the BaSAM as a patch to the west of the sunspot penumbra in a region with few bright points. This region corresponds to a quieter patch in the photospheric images, showing mostly granulation.

thumbnail Fig. 5.

Logarithmic BaSAM of the Ca II H intensity. The horizontal colour bar indicates, from left to right, increased activity. The dashed black rectangle highlights the region of the Gregor/GRIS slit-scan, while the encircled area displays a region with small-scale Ca II H brightenings (see more details in the text).

Figure 6 presents the temporal evolution of the GRIS observations at the line core rest wavelength of five selected spectral lines, obtained from three consecutive GRIS scans. In the case of the He I spectral line, we selected as a reference wavelength that corresponds to the red component of the triplet. Each column corresponds to a different scan: Scan 1 (08:41:53–08:44:48 UT), Scan 2 (08:45:44–08:47:43 UT), and Scan 3 (08:47:49–08:50:48 UT), respectively. Rows display the spatial distribution of intensity signals for, from top to bottom, the Si I 10827.1 Å transition (mid-upper photosphere), the He I 10830.33 Å triplet (upper chromosphere), and the Ca I 10833.4 Å, Na I 10834.9 Å, and Ca I 10838.9 Å photospheric lines.

thumbnail Fig. 6.

Spatial distribution of the intensity at the line core rest wavelength of five selected spectral lines observed with the GRIS instrument during three consecutive scans of the target region. From left to right, columns correspond to Scan 1 (08:41:53–08:44:48 UT), Scan 2 (08:45:44–08:47:43 UT), and Scan 3 (08:47:49–08:50:48 UT), respectively. From top to bottom, we show the spatial distribution of the line core rest wavelength of Si I 10827 Å, the He I 10830 Å triplet, Ca I 10833 Å, Na I 10835 Å, and the Ca I 10839 Å line. Coloured asterisks mark the location of the reference profiles that we study in detail later. The spatial region used for intensity normalisation is marked by a black box in the bottom panels.

The greyscale maps reveal spatial variations in the intensity between successive scans, reflecting the evolving flare-related dynamics. The most pronounced changes occur in the He I triplet, consistent with its chromospheric origin, whereas more subtle intensity variations are seen in the photospheric lines. Interestingly, we can see an enhancement of the line core intensity for the silicon transition in some spatial locations. We plan to investigate more later on the possible reasons for this change, as it is somehow unexpected because the photosphere is usually mostly insensitive to flaring activity (e.g. Fletcher et al. 2011). Coloured asterisks mark specific locations within the FOV where we found complex Stokes profiles, which we aim to study in more detail.

Figure 7 shows the Stokes profiles highlighted in Fig. 6. We focus only on the Stokes I and V profiles as linear polarisation signals are below the noise level in these particular cases. We added in black in each panel the spatially averaged profile (see squared region in the bottom panels Fig. 6) for comparison purposes only, while colours correspond to their spatial location in Fig. 6.

thumbnail Fig. 7.

Normalised Stokes-I (top) and Stokes-V (bottom) profiles from the locations marked in Fig. 6. Vertical dashed lines indicate the rest wavelengths of Si I 10827.1 Å (purple), the He I triplet (green), Ca I 10833.4 Å (brown), Na I 10834.9 Å (violet), and Ca I 10838.9 Å (cyan). The quiet-Sun region reference spectrum is shown in black.

Starting from the leftmost top panel, we can see that the He I triplet intensity profile appears as a broad component (green) in comparison with the averaged profile (black) from a region with low solar activity. In the case of the next location (second from the left), the He I triplet appears again as a broad profile but this time it has an enhanced intensity profile above the continuum of the spectral region (orange). In this case, we can see also a reduction in the depth of the spectral lines, particularly for the silicon transition, with respect to the reference profile. In the third selected location (third from the left), the intensity profile has become even more complex. There is one absorption contribution at the spectral range close to the rest wavelength of the He I triplet, but there is a strong emission in the region close to the rest centre of the Si I line (see blue). In fact, on top of this broad emission profile we can detect a weak absorption contribution that seems to be the footprint of the silicon spectral line. Finally, the rightmost intensity profile (red), corresponds to an even more complex scenario where there are multiple broad contributions: one close to the silicon transition red wing, a second close to the rest wavelength of the He I triplet, and a third towards longer wavelengths, close to the telluric line at 10832 Å. In the case of the circular polarisation signals, we can see that the Si I line profiles are almost standard profiles in the first two cases where the broad contribution is far from it (see green and orange), while it becomes a bit more complex with some kind of extended wings in the other two cases (see blue and red), which could be the contribution of the multiple broad components detected in the intensity profiles.

4. Numerical modelling

In order to infer the information of the physical parameters from observations of the He I 10830 Å it is customary to use numerical codes such as the HAnle and ZEeman Light (HAZEL, Asensio Ramos et al. 2008) inversion code, which takes into account the impact of atomic-level polarisation, the Zeeman, Hanle, and Paschen-Back effects when solving the radiative transfer equation and computing the emergent Stokes vector. However, as the spectra obtained during these flaring processes are so complex, we decided to follow a multi-step approach. In this study, we focus on performing synthesis with various configurations for the number of atmospheric components as well as their main physical properties; for example, the sign or the amplitude of their line-of-sight (LOS) velocity. The goal is to produce synthetic profiles that resemble representative observed ones. This task, although manual and laborious, is fundamental to understanding what kind of phenomenon is taking place. In addition, although for simplicity we only focus on reproducing the intensity profiles, this study will also help to define the optimum baseline inversion strategy for fitting the full Stokes vector. At the same time, given the complexity of the profiles, which will require different configurations for a successful inversion, we prefer to leave the inversions to a future publication. We anticipate that a multi-step inversion process will be required whereby we shall first classify the profiles in families with similar properties, and then invert them with tailor-made inversion configurations optimised for each family based on what we learned from the synthesis studies. Although we defer this to a future publication, we show in the following that the simple analysis we do here allows us to understand in detail the possible origin of the very complex profiles studied in the previous section.

We aimed to start this trial-and-error study as simply as possible. Our initial hypothesis was that the distorted silicon spectra were due to the impact of a complex, broad, and extremely Doppler-shifted helium profile, a signature of the flare activity. Thus, we assumed that the photosphere could be represented by a reference semi-empirical 1D model that would produce standard Si I 10827.1 Å profiles. Therefore, the photosphere is described using the reference FALC atmosphere (we only added 300 K from log τ = [ − 1, −3] to the temperature stratification) from Fontenla et al. (1993), with a magnetic field vector of 500 G in strength, 45 degrees of inclination, and 45 degrees of azimuth constant with height for generating the Si I 10827.1 Å. After that, we added a chromosphere (a slab atmospheric model with physical parameters constant with height) that produces the He I 10830 Å triplet and started modifying this chromosphere until we got profiles similar to the observed ones. At this point, we did not believe the magnetic field vector played a crucial role in generating the complex intensity profiles, so we simply used a reference magnetic field with a field strength of 200 G, 45 degrees of inclination, and azimuth. Then, we modified the input values for the LOS velocity and the Doppler width to shift the location of the helium line centre and increased the width of the spectral line, respectively. Finally, we also tuned the enhancement factor β to shift the profile shape from absorption to emission (see more details in the HAZEL manual6), leaving the rest of atmospheric parameters with the default values.

We present in Fig. 8 the observed (colours) and synthetic (black) intensity profiles of a spectral region containing only the Si I 10827.1 Å line, the He I 10830 Å triplet, and the telluric line at 10832 Å. The first two profiles from the left are fitted with only one chromospheric component, while the third and fourth profiles from the left required two and three chromospheric components, respectively. Interestingly, all profiles share some properties. First, and most importantly, all He I triplet profiles exhibit a broad profile covering a wide range of wavelengths, making it impossible to distinguish the blue and the red components of the triplet. We reproduced this effect by increasing the Doppler width of the lines, with values in the range of 15–25 km s−1. Such high values indicate that the spectral line is being formed in atmospheric layers where either the plasma has a high temperature or strong turbulent velocities are present in the resolution element. Additionally, the single chromospheric component used in the first two profiles from the left is very different, requiring absorption in the leftmost profile and emission in the other case. The LOS velocities for the chromospheric components used to match each profile are −10 and 18 km s−1, respectively (where negative means blueshifts). Those values are not extreme for the case of the He I triplet in a flaring scenario (e.g. Fletcher et al. 2011; Kuckein et al. 2025).

thumbnail Fig. 8.

Comparison between the GRIS observed intensity profiles and those synthesised with the HAZEL code. Each panel corresponds to a reference profile that shows a distinct spectral shape, and whose location on the Sun is highlighted in Fig. 6. We used the same colour code as that figure for the observations, while synthetic profiles are plotted in black. The spectral range only contains the Si I 10827.1 Å, the He I 10830 Å triplet, and the telluric line at 10832 Å for visualisation purposes. In contrast, vertical dashed lines designate the rest wavelength of the mentioned spectral lines.

In the case of the third and fourth profiles from the left, their shape is more complex, requiring additional chromospheric components. For instance, in the case of the third panel, we have a strong emission near the Si I 10827.1 Å rest wavelength and then an absorption near the 10830 Å region. We decided to add two chromospheres, similar to the individual ones from the two previous locations, i.e. one in absorption (used in the first profile) and the second one in emission (used on the second profile from the left). The component producing the absorption is also wide, so we used a Doppler width of 25 km s−1. The centre of the triplet is blueshifted with a LOS velocity of −19 km s−1. The chromospheric component producing the emission spectral feature uses the same Doppler width but is blueshifted with a LOS velocity of −88 km s−1. Interestingly, a good fit of the Si I 10827.1 Å line is obtained without any significant modification of the FALC atmosphere except for the mentioned slight increase of 300 K between log τ500 = [ − 2, −3]. Thus, we can conclude that the main element producing the complex spectral features found between [10 824,10 828] Å is a strong and broad helium component that is superimposed on an almost standard silicon profile. Finally, the profile in the rightmost panel is just a continuation of building complexity from the previous cases. We can see three distinct broad peaks, two in emission and one in absorption, so we proceeded to use three chromospheric components similar to the previous ones, centred at −78, −28, and +25 km s−1 (where the negative sign indicates blueshifted motions).

5. Discussion

We have developed a strategy to accurately reproduce a selection of the most complex profiles observed. In the first two panels from the left in Fig. 8, we can infer that there is a main contribution of hot, rather turbulent, chromospheric plasma moving at a certain speed along the LOS. The main difference between the two panels from the left is possibly a different temperature, higher for the second profile from the left, which results in a He I profile with a higher intensity than that of the local continuum. In the case of the two rightmost panels, we have an additional ingredient of complexity because, besides having broad profiles, we also have multiple broad components, some of them close to rest velocities and others showing extreme Doppler shift values. The reason for that seems to be the juxtaposition of numerous flare phases. We believe we have the contribution of the decaying phase from the first flare, specifically the broad component close to the rest wavelength of helium, along with a high-speed component created by the impulsive phase of the second flaring process. A more detailed physical interpretation of the events is beyond the scope of this work. It would require the detailed inversion of the Stokes profiles and an analysis of the spatial and temporal characteristics of the inferred properties. Despite that, we can use the four cases studied here to understand some general properties of the flaring process. In general, we find large Doppler widths and some chromospheric components in emission. If the large Doppler widths (15–25 km s−1) are caused by thermal broadening, we can infer the temperature using

Δ v = 2 k B T m , $$ \begin{aligned} \Delta v = \sqrt{\frac{2 k_B T }{m}}, \end{aligned} $$(1)

where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T the thermal temperature, and m the mass of helium. The results indicate that we would need a temperature ranging from around 50 000 to 150 000 K. Those temperatures are too high for the region of formation of the He I spectral line triplet, so we conclude that non-thermal quasi-random motions are playing a significant role in the flaring region. The presence of such turbulent motions is concomitant with the presence of strong unidirectional flows, as is indicated by the LOS velocities inferred from the synthesis.

The presence of emission in the He I 10830 Å triplet is not standard in on-disc solar observations. It is modelled in HAZEL as an enhancement factor, β, which modifies the source function of the slab where the He I triplet is

I = e K τ I sun + K 1 ( 1 e K τ ) β S , $$ \begin{aligned} \mathbf I = e^{-\mathbf{K}\tau } \mathbf{I }_{\rm sun} + \mathbf K ^{-1} \left( 1-e^{-\mathbf K \tau } \right) \beta \mathbf S , \end{aligned} $$(2)

where Isun is the Stokes vector that illuminates the slab (see Asensio Ramos et al. 2008, for more information), τ is the optical depth on the red component of the triplet, K the propagation matrix, and S is the source function. Although it is not straightforward to provide an actual physical meaning to the parameter β, we can understand it as an overpopulation factor of the 3P upper level of the 10 830 Å triplet. This overpopulation is surely produced by overionisation produced by the flaring process, which, after the ladder of recombinations, leads to a trapping of population in the 3P level.

Also, as part of future work, we need to disentangle the meaning of the inferred LOS velocities. Since we are very close to the limb, blue- or redshifted motions with respect to the observer need to be projected back into the local reference frame so that we can get an accurate estimation of the real plasma velocities and orientation during the flaring activity.

Finally, we cannot forget that we observed the four Stokes parameters, and hence we should also try to infer and interpret the magnetic properties of these multiple chromospheric components. It is even more challenging than fitting Stokes I because their signals are weak. This is a consequence, partially, of the fact that Stokes I profiles are very broad. Additionally, the presence of several components complicates the shape of the polarimetric profiles, making it more challenging to interpret the signals.

6. Conclusion

We have presented full-Stokes spectropolarimetry and high-resolution imaging of observations of the dynamic evolution of the photosphere and chromosphere during and after two C-class flares (FL1 and FL2) in the active region NOAA 13363. We analysed slit-scan spectra in the infrared spectral region around the He I triplet, including the photospheric Na I, Ca I, and upper-photospheric Si I lines, using the GRIS infrared spectrograph. The photospheric lines did not show significant changes during the flare events, consistent with their photospheric formation. In contrast, the upper chromospheric He I triplet exhibited a clear increase in intensity starting with FL1, sometimes transitioning into emission. To quantify these changes, we computed BaSAMs from HiFI+ speckle-restored Ca II H images, which revealed two distinct flare components: a diffuse haze related to FL2 and narrow and bright filaments close to the active region. Time-lapse analysis indicates that the flare emission did not significantly affect the inverse granulation or nearby plage. The filament morphology suggests a link to magnetic field reconfiguration, while disturbed fine-scale emission hints at plasma turbulence.

The enhanced He I emission we observe is consistent with previous studies. For example, intensity ratios of He I to continuum of 1.36, 1.30, and 1.15 have been reported during M2.0, C9.7, and C2.0 flares, respectively (Li et al. 2007; Penn & Kuhn 1995; Sasso et al. 2011), while Kuckein et al. (2015) reported ratios of about 1.86 in an M3.2 flare. In our observations, the He I profiles exhibit strong red- and blueshifted Doppler shifts close to −90 km s−1. These velocities are supersonic, given the local sound speed of ∼10 km s−1 at the formation temperature of 8000–10 000 K, and are consistent with field-aligned evaporation and condensation flows commonly reported in flaring regions or associated with filament eruptions (Li et al. 2007; Kuckein et al. 2015; Sasso et al. 2011; Kuckein et al. 2020; Sowmya et al. 2022).

We also complemented the analysis of the spectral features by doing forward modelling with the HAZEL code. Our theoretical studies reveal that the different broad components, either in emission or absorption, redshifted or blueshifted, can be reproduced with a helium contribution with a large Doppler width. The larger the number of contributions, the larger the number of chromospheric components we needed to add to the synthesis configuration. Interestingly, we confirmed that the apparent enhancement in the Si I spectral range seen in some cases is simply due to the overlap with a strongly blueshifted He I emission component, rather than intrinsic photospheric heating (Judge et al. 2015).

Our observations confirm the chromospheric origin of the He I emission and show that the extreme red- and blueshifted profiles reflect a complex response of the flaring chromosphere. Radiative excitation from coronal EUV irradiation, energy deposition by flare-accelerated electrons, and dynamic field-aligned plasma flows likely act together to drive the observed supersonic downflows and upflows. In contrast, the photospheric lines (Ca I, Na I, and mostly Si I) show no measurable changes in their cores, demonstrating that the photosphere (at least the lower part) is not directly heated by flare energy deposition.

Multi-line diagnostics such as those presented here are therefore crucial to separate chromospheric and photospheric flare responses. However, we plan to delve more into the analysis of these data through inversions of the multiple observed maps. We aim to infer the spatial distribution and evolution of atmospheric parameters across the entire dataset. In doing so, we strive to constrain the role of different physical mechanisms, such as conduction, ionisation, and indirect coupling, in transporting energy from upper layers into the lower solar atmosphere.

Data availability

Movies associated with Figs. 2–4 are available at https://www.aanda.org

Acknowledgments

The 1.5-meter Gregor solar telescope was built by a German consortium under the leadership of the Institute for Solar Physics (KIS) in Freiburg with the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP), the Institute for Astrophysics Göttingen (IAG), and the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (MPS) in Göttingen as partners, and with contributions by the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias and the Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. The Gregor AO and instrument distribution optics were redesigned by KIS, whose technical staff is gratefully acknowledged. This research has received financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 824135 (SOLARNET). Work acknowledges grant RYC2022-037660 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ESF Investing in your future. This work was supported by the Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation (SRNSF) grant YS-22-407. This research was made possible by the Fellowship for Excellent Researchers R2-R4 (09I03-03-V04-00015). CQN acknowledges support from the Agencia Estatal de Investigación del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU/AEI) under grant “Polarimetric Inference of Magnetic Fields” and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) with reference PID2022-136563NB-I00/10.13039/501100011033. The publication is part of Project ICTS2022-007828, funded by MICIN and the European Union NextGenerationEU/RTRP. CQN also acknowledges support from Grants PID2024-156538NB-I00 and PID2024-156066OB-C55 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe”. MB, PG and JR acknowledge the support of the project VEGA 2/0043/24. MV acknowledges the support from IGSTC-WISER grant (IGSTC-05373). SL acknowledges the support of Štefan Schwarz Support Fund 2023/OV1/015. TVZ was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project PAT7550024.

References

  1. Akimov, L. A., Belkina, I. L., & Marchenko, G. P. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 193 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allred, J. C., Kowalski, A. F., & Carlsson, M. 2015, ApJ, 809, 104 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anan, T., Yoneya, T., Ichimoto, K., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 101 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aschwanden, M. J. 2005, in Physics of the Solar Corona, Springer Praxis Books (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), XXII, 908 [Google Scholar]
  5. Asensio Ramos, A., Trujillo, Bueno J., & Landi, Degl’ Innocenti E. 2008, ApJ, 683, 542 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Balthasar, H., Gömöry, P., González Manrique, S. J., et al. 2016, AN, 337, 1050 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berkefeld, T., Soltau, D., Schmidt, D., & von der Lühe, O. 2010, Appl. Opt., 49, G155 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berkefeld, T., Schmidt, D., Soltau, D., von der Lühe, O., & Heidecke, F. 2012, Astron. Nachr., 333, 863 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, B., Bastian, T. S., & Gary, D. E. 2024, ApJ, 971, 128 [Google Scholar]
  10. Collados, M. 1999, ASPC, 184, 3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Collados, M. V. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4843, 55 [Google Scholar]
  12. Collados, M., López, R., Páez, E., et al. 2012, AN, 333, 872 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  13. Denker, C., & Verma, M. 2019, SoPh, 294, 71 [Google Scholar]
  14. Denker, C., Dineva, E., Balthasar, H., et al. 2018a, SoPh, 293, 44 [Google Scholar]
  15. Denker, C., Kuckein, C., Verma, M., et al. 2018b, ApJSS, 236, 5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Denker, C., Verma, M., Wisniewska, A., et al. 2023, JATIS, 9, 015001 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ding, M. D., Li, H., & Fang, C. 2005, A&A, 432, 699 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fisher, R. R. 1964, ApJ, 140, 1326 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fisher, G. H., Canfield, R. C., & McClymont, A. N. 1985, ApJ, 289, 414 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fletcher, L., Dennis, B. R., Hudson, H. S., et al. 2011, Space Sci. Rev., 159, 19 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fontenla, J. M., Avrett, E. H., & Loeser, R. 1993, ApJ, 406, 319 [Google Scholar]
  22. Graham, D. R., & Cauzzi, G. 2015, ApJ, 807, L22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hirayama, T. 1974, Sol. Phys., 34, 323 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hudson, H. S., & Ryan, J. M. 1995, ARA&A, 33, 239 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Joshi, B., Srivastava, A. K., & Zaqarashvili, T. V. 2025, A&A, 698, A11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. Judge, P. G., Kleint, L., & Dalda, A. S. 2015, ApJ, 814, 100 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamlah, R., Verma, M., Denker, C., & Wang, H. 2023, A&A, 675, A182 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kleint, L., Berkefeld, T., Esteves, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A27 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuckein, C., Collados, M., & Sainz, R. M. 2015, ApJ, 799, L25 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuckein, C., Denker, C., Verma, M., et al. 2017, IAUS, 327, 20 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuckein, C., González Manrique, S. J., Kleint, L., & Asensio Ramos, A. 2020, A&A, 640, A71 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuckein, C., Collados, M., Asensio Ramos, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A121 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 17 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, H., You, J., Yu, X., & Du, Q. 2007, SoPh, 241, 301 [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, H., Chen, B., Feng, L., et al. 2019, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 19, 158 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, C., Fang, C., Li, Z., et al. 2022, Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, X., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., & Wang, H. 2024, SoPh, 299, 85 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nagai, F., & Emslie, A. G. 1984, ApJ, 279, 896 [Google Scholar]
  39. Neupert, W. M. 1968, ApJ, 153, L59 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Penn, M. J., & Kuhn, J. R. 1995, ApJ, 441, 51 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, SoPh, 275, 3 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  42. Petrie, G. J. D., & Sudol, J. J. 2010, ApJ, 724, 1218 [Google Scholar]
  43. Quintero Noda, C., Schlichenmaier, R., Bellot Rubio, L. R., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reames, D. V. 2013, Space Sci. Rev., 175, 53 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Reep, J. W., Warren, H. P., Crump, N. A., & Simões, P. J. A. 2016, ApJ, 827, 145 [Google Scholar]
  46. Reiners, A., Lemke, U., Bauer, F., Beeck, B., & Huke, P. 2016, A&A, 595, A26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ricchiazzi, P. J., & Canfield, R. C. 1983, ApJ, 272, 739 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rimmele, T. R., Warner, M., Keil, S. L., et al. 2020, SoPh, 295, 172 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sasso, C., Lagg, A., & Solanki, S. K. 2011, A&A, 526, A42 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  50. Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 207 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schmidt, W., von der Lühe, O., Volkmer, R., et al. 2012, AN, 333, 796 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sowmya, K., Lagg, A., Solanki, S. K., & Castellanos Durán, J. S. 2022, A&A, 661, A122 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stix, M. 2002, in The Sun: An introduction, 2nd edn. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer) [Google Scholar]
  54. Švestka, Z. F. 1976, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Solar Flares, 54 (Dordrecht: Springer) [Google Scholar]
  55. Tei, A., Sakaue, T., Okamoto, T. J., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 100 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Verma, M., Balthasar, H., Deng, N., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A109 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vicente Arévalo, A., Štepán, J., del Pino Alemán, T., & Martínez González, M. J. 2023, A&A, 675, A45 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wöger, F., & von der Lühe, O. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7019, 70191E [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xu, Z., Lagg, A., Solanki, S., & Liu, Y. 2012, ApJ, 749, 138 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zharkova, V. V., Arzner, K., Benz, A. O., et al. 2011, Space Sci. Rev., 159, 357 [Google Scholar]

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Temporal evolution of the Fried-parameter r0 (black dots) and air mass (solid line) during the 16 July 2023 observations with the 1.5-metre Gregor solar telescope. The light grey rectangle corresponds to the time interval of the HiFI+ observations. The black dots were taken from the Gregor status monitor and the colour-coded dots are recorded in the headers of the GRIS scans. The colour-coded dots refer to the Fried-parameter r0 for each step during the five GRIS scans. The air mass was obtained by using the web interface to the JPL Horizons On−Line Ephemeris System.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Collection of SDO observations taken at around 08:48 UT. Co-aligned Gregor/GRIS slit-scan and HiFI+ FOVs are shown as red and green (TiO) as well as white (Ca II H) rectangles, respectively. The locations of the first flare (FL1) and second flare (FL2) are labelled in each panel. The bottom left image displays an HMI continuum image of the solar disc at the time of the observation, highlighting with a black square the location of the active region of interest. The lower right panel shows the temporal evolution of the X-ray flux recorded by GOES in the 1.0–8.0 Å (red) and 0.5–4.0 Å (blue) channels for the period from 08:30 UT – 09:10 UT on 16 July 2023. Gregor’s observations are indicated by the shaded blue region. The X-ray maxima are indicated by a solid green line for FL1 and a dotted blue line for FL2, corresponding to the flare peaks. The temporal evolution of the flares is shown in Movie 1 (available online).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Speckle-restored TiO image taken at 08:45:18 UT at the start of the second flare FL2. The white rectangle indicates the size and location of the speckle-restored Ca II H image shown in Fig. 4. The solid red rectangle shows the area covered by the Gregor/GRIS slit-scan. The associated animation is provided as Movie 2.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

Time series of speckle-restored Ca II H images showing the temporal evolution of the second flare FL2 at a cadence of about 12 s (time interval − 24 s). The small white rectangle in the lower left corner has a size of 5″ × 1″. Gregor/GRIS slit scans are indicated by the solid red rectangle. The black arrow and the label ‘FL2’ indicate the identified location of the second flare. Note that the FOV of these HiFI+ Ca II H observations does not cover the location of FL1, which lies outside these panels. The corresponding time evolution is available in Movie 3.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5.

Logarithmic BaSAM of the Ca II H intensity. The horizontal colour bar indicates, from left to right, increased activity. The dashed black rectangle highlights the region of the Gregor/GRIS slit-scan, while the encircled area displays a region with small-scale Ca II H brightenings (see more details in the text).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6.

Spatial distribution of the intensity at the line core rest wavelength of five selected spectral lines observed with the GRIS instrument during three consecutive scans of the target region. From left to right, columns correspond to Scan 1 (08:41:53–08:44:48 UT), Scan 2 (08:45:44–08:47:43 UT), and Scan 3 (08:47:49–08:50:48 UT), respectively. From top to bottom, we show the spatial distribution of the line core rest wavelength of Si I 10827 Å, the He I 10830 Å triplet, Ca I 10833 Å, Na I 10835 Å, and the Ca I 10839 Å line. Coloured asterisks mark the location of the reference profiles that we study in detail later. The spatial region used for intensity normalisation is marked by a black box in the bottom panels.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7.

Normalised Stokes-I (top) and Stokes-V (bottom) profiles from the locations marked in Fig. 6. Vertical dashed lines indicate the rest wavelengths of Si I 10827.1 Å (purple), the He I triplet (green), Ca I 10833.4 Å (brown), Na I 10834.9 Å (violet), and Ca I 10838.9 Å (cyan). The quiet-Sun region reference spectrum is shown in black.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8.

Comparison between the GRIS observed intensity profiles and those synthesised with the HAZEL code. Each panel corresponds to a reference profile that shows a distinct spectral shape, and whose location on the Sun is highlighted in Fig. 6. We used the same colour code as that figure for the observations, while synthetic profiles are plotted in black. The spectral range only contains the Si I 10827.1 Å, the He I 10830 Å triplet, and the telluric line at 10832 Å for visualisation purposes. In contrast, vertical dashed lines designate the rest wavelength of the mentioned spectral lines.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.